Redistricting Out Descriptive Representation: The Harmful Effect of Splitting ZIP Codes on the Constituent–Representative Link

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics Pub Date : 2022-06-27 DOI:10.1017/rep.2021.33
T. Steelman, John A. Curiel
{"title":"Redistricting Out Descriptive Representation: The Harmful Effect of Splitting ZIP Codes on the Constituent–Representative Link","authors":"T. Steelman, John A. Curiel","doi":"10.1017/rep.2021.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Redistricting poses a potential harm to American voters in limiting choice and accountability at the polls. Although voters still retain their right to contact their representatives, research shows that the confusion created when redistricting divides ZIP codes confounds the constituent–representative link. We build on existing research that shows splitting ZIP codes across multiple congressional districts leads to harms in representation. Specifically, we examine the role of splitting ZIP codes on the recognition of the racial group membership of one’s Congressional representative, a foundational component of the descriptive representation of racial minority voters via minority–majority districts in the United States. We find that citizens living in split ZIP codes are significantly less likely to know the race of their member of Congress. This occurs even when controlling for a host of factors including the race and partisanship of the constituent, the tenure of the member, and the amount of time a constituent has lived in their congressional district. Our work provides further evidence of the democratic harms experienced by American citizens living in ZIP codes that are split between multiple congressional districts. This work also points to the representational harms produced by poor district design on the representation of American voters.","PeriodicalId":37190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics","volume":"132 1","pages":"1 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2021.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Redistricting poses a potential harm to American voters in limiting choice and accountability at the polls. Although voters still retain their right to contact their representatives, research shows that the confusion created when redistricting divides ZIP codes confounds the constituent–representative link. We build on existing research that shows splitting ZIP codes across multiple congressional districts leads to harms in representation. Specifically, we examine the role of splitting ZIP codes on the recognition of the racial group membership of one’s Congressional representative, a foundational component of the descriptive representation of racial minority voters via minority–majority districts in the United States. We find that citizens living in split ZIP codes are significantly less likely to know the race of their member of Congress. This occurs even when controlling for a host of factors including the race and partisanship of the constituent, the tenure of the member, and the amount of time a constituent has lived in their congressional district. Our work provides further evidence of the democratic harms experienced by American citizens living in ZIP codes that are split between multiple congressional districts. This work also points to the representational harms produced by poor district design on the representation of American voters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新划分描述性代表:分裂邮政编码对选民-代表联系的有害影响
选区重划限制了选民的选择和问责制,对美国选民造成了潜在的伤害。尽管选民仍然保留与他们的代表联系的权利,但研究表明,重新划分邮政编码时产生的混乱混淆了选民与代表的联系。我们基于现有的研究表明,在多个国会选区划分邮政编码会导致代表权受损。具体来说,我们研究了邮政编码分裂对国会代表种族群体成员身份的认可的作用,这是美国少数民族多数地区少数民族选民描述性代表性的基本组成部分。我们发现,居住在不同邮政编码地区的公民知道其国会议员种族的可能性明显较低。即使在控制了选民的种族和党派、议员任期以及选民在其国会选区居住的时间等一系列因素后,这种情况也会发生。我们的工作进一步证明了生活在多个国会选区的邮政编码地区的美国公民所经历的民主危害。这项工作还指出了由糟糕的地区设计对美国选民代表性产生的代表性危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics
Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Responsiveness to Coethnics and Cominorities: Evidence from an Audit Experiment of State Legislators Introduction to the Final 2023 Issue The Advantage of Disadvantage: Costly Protest and Legislative Responsiveness By LaGina Gause, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022 Counting the State: State Resistance and Federal Enumeration of Latinos 1930–1970 Anger, Fear, and the Racialization of News Media Coverage of Protest Activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1