Towards a Labour-Process History of Newsworkers

IF 1.7 3区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Javnost-The Public Pub Date : 1997-01-01 DOI:10.1080/13183222.1997.11008639
Yung-Ho Im
{"title":"Towards a Labour-Process History of Newsworkers","authors":"Yung-Ho Im","doi":"10.1080/13183222.1997.11008639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores writing a history of newsworkers from a labour-process theory perspective and attempts to demonstrate how journalism history may be rewritten as a history of the class experience of newsworkers. Towards this end, the essay examines theories of the labour process by Harry Braverman (1974) and Michael Burawoy (1979; 1985) with the goal of suggesting their implications for labour historians in the field of journalism. Although subjects of newswork and labour have remained objects of descriptive studies in journalism history, they are typically part of a chronicle of celebrated events or famous individuals. Instead, a history of newswork needs to pay more attention to inconspicuous changes in the structural environment and the everyday experiences of anonymous newsworkers. Such a task is possible only through a theoretically informed inquiry into labour history; in fact, theories of the labour process may potentially become major contributors to an understanding of newsworkers and their histories. The theoretical perspective of this essay has been informed by critical Marxist theories and incorporates the notion of class into key elements of a labour history of newswork. It rejects an economist notion of class, however, and chooses to address the subjective and culturalideological dimensions of class experiences among newsworkers. Although the notion of class experience is not a clearly defined concept, it emphasises a culturalist approach and suggests the significance of a linkage, without a necessary correspondence, between the structural location and the subjective, cultural aspect of newswork. YUNG-HO IM","PeriodicalId":46298,"journal":{"name":"Javnost-The Public","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Javnost-The Public","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.1997.11008639","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

This essay explores writing a history of newsworkers from a labour-process theory perspective and attempts to demonstrate how journalism history may be rewritten as a history of the class experience of newsworkers. Towards this end, the essay examines theories of the labour process by Harry Braverman (1974) and Michael Burawoy (1979; 1985) with the goal of suggesting their implications for labour historians in the field of journalism. Although subjects of newswork and labour have remained objects of descriptive studies in journalism history, they are typically part of a chronicle of celebrated events or famous individuals. Instead, a history of newswork needs to pay more attention to inconspicuous changes in the structural environment and the everyday experiences of anonymous newsworkers. Such a task is possible only through a theoretically informed inquiry into labour history; in fact, theories of the labour process may potentially become major contributors to an understanding of newsworkers and their histories. The theoretical perspective of this essay has been informed by critical Marxist theories and incorporates the notion of class into key elements of a labour history of newswork. It rejects an economist notion of class, however, and chooses to address the subjective and culturalideological dimensions of class experiences among newsworkers. Although the notion of class experience is not a clearly defined concept, it emphasises a culturalist approach and suggests the significance of a linkage, without a necessary correspondence, between the structural location and the subjective, cultural aspect of newswork. YUNG-HO IM
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新闻工作者的劳动过程史研究
本文从劳动过程理论的角度探讨了新闻工作者的历史写作,并试图证明新闻史如何被改写为新闻工作者阶级经验的历史。为此,本文考察了Harry Braverman(1974)和Michael Burawoy(1979)的劳动过程理论;1985),目的是为新闻领域的劳工历史学家提供启示。虽然新闻工作和劳动的主题一直是新闻史上描述性研究的对象,但它们通常是著名事件或著名人物编年史的一部分。相反,新闻工作的历史需要更多地关注结构环境中不明显的变化和匿名新闻工作者的日常经历。这样的任务只有通过对劳工历史的理论调查才有可能完成;事实上,工党过程的理论可能会成为理解新闻工作者及其历史的主要贡献者。这篇文章的理论观点已经被马克思主义的批判理论所告知,并将阶级的概念纳入新闻工作的劳动史的关键要素。然而,它拒绝了经济学家的阶级概念,并选择解决新闻工作者阶级经验的主观和文化意识形态维度。虽然阶级经验的概念不是一个明确定义的概念,但它强调了一种文化主义的方法,并提出了新闻工作的结构位置与主观文化方面之间没有必要对应的联系的重要性。yung ho IM
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Javnost-The Public
Javnost-The Public COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Javnost - The Public, an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed social and cultural science journal published by the European Institute for Communication and Culture in association with the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, addresses problems of the public sphere on international and interdisciplinary levels. It encourages the development of theory and research, and helps understand differences between cultures. Contributors confront problems of the public, public communication, public opinion, public discourse, publicness, publicity, and public life from a variety of disciplinary and theoretical perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Not Forgetting Black Lives Matter: Memory, Protest and Counterpublics Public Service Media in Northern Ireland: Prominence and Vulnerability in a Small Media System Counterpublics and Structural Change in Media and Politics: A Theoretical Framework on Transformations within a Long-Term Historical Perspective Anti-Systemic Counterpublics: Rethinking the Counterpublic Sphere Far Right > Digital Rights: The Precarity of Free Expression, Internet Access, Net Neutrality and Data Privacy in Bolsonaro’s Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1