Deltoid Ligament Reconstruction in Lateral Malleolus Fractures with Deltoid Rupture

IF 0.2 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Trauma monthly Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.30491/TM.2021.246367.1169
K. Asadi, M. Mardani-Kivi, Orod Gharibi
{"title":"Deltoid Ligament Reconstruction in Lateral Malleolus Fractures with Deltoid Rupture","authors":"K. Asadi, M. Mardani-Kivi, Orod Gharibi","doi":"10.30491/TM.2021.246367.1169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Treatment of lateral malleolus fractures is a controversial issue, especially when is associated with deltoid ligament (DL) rupture Objectives: In the present study, the effect of DL repair in patients with lateral malleolar fractures with deltoid rupture was investigated on medial clear space (MCS), ankle-hindfoot score (AHS), and malreduction rates. Methods: 65 patients who referred with lateral malleolus fracture plus DL rupture during 2017-2018 and underwent surgery were studied. The diagnosis was conducted by a single renowned orthopedic surgeon according to physical examination, clinical, and paraclinical findings such as radiography. A questionnaire was used to record  demographic information, pain severity, duration of follow-up, AO classification, pre- and postoperative MCS, AHS, and malreduction and data of the patients with and without DL reconstruction were compared using SPSS software (version 21). Results: About half of the patients (51%) were men. DL was reconstructed in 50.8% of the patients. AO category of the most (53.8%) of the patients was class-B. There was no difference between the patients with and without DL reconstruction in the frequency of fibular malreduction, mean pain severity, and AHS (P>0.05). Mean MCS was neither different between the groups before (P=0.946), nor after surgery (P=0.794). Mean change in MCS score was -2.03±0.95 and -1.94±0.95 in the groups with and without DL reconstruction, respectively (P=0.606). Conclusion: This study showed that DL reconstruction did not affect the medial clearance space. Further studies are required on stability and biomechanics to determine which injuries need surgery and which ones need conservative treatment.","PeriodicalId":23249,"journal":{"name":"Trauma monthly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma monthly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2021.246367.1169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Treatment of lateral malleolus fractures is a controversial issue, especially when is associated with deltoid ligament (DL) rupture Objectives: In the present study, the effect of DL repair in patients with lateral malleolar fractures with deltoid rupture was investigated on medial clear space (MCS), ankle-hindfoot score (AHS), and malreduction rates. Methods: 65 patients who referred with lateral malleolus fracture plus DL rupture during 2017-2018 and underwent surgery were studied. The diagnosis was conducted by a single renowned orthopedic surgeon according to physical examination, clinical, and paraclinical findings such as radiography. A questionnaire was used to record  demographic information, pain severity, duration of follow-up, AO classification, pre- and postoperative MCS, AHS, and malreduction and data of the patients with and without DL reconstruction were compared using SPSS software (version 21). Results: About half of the patients (51%) were men. DL was reconstructed in 50.8% of the patients. AO category of the most (53.8%) of the patients was class-B. There was no difference between the patients with and without DL reconstruction in the frequency of fibular malreduction, mean pain severity, and AHS (P>0.05). Mean MCS was neither different between the groups before (P=0.946), nor after surgery (P=0.794). Mean change in MCS score was -2.03±0.95 and -1.94±0.95 in the groups with and without DL reconstruction, respectively (P=0.606). Conclusion: This study showed that DL reconstruction did not affect the medial clearance space. Further studies are required on stability and biomechanics to determine which injuries need surgery and which ones need conservative treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三角韧带重建治疗外踝骨折伴三角肌破裂
背景:外踝骨折的治疗是一个有争议的问题,特别是当与三角韧带(DL)破裂相关时。目的:本研究通过内侧间隙(MCS)、踝-后足评分(AHS)和复位不良率,探讨DL修复对外踝骨折合并三角韧带破裂患者的影响。方法:对2017-2018年间65例外踝骨折合并DL破裂行手术治疗的患者进行分析。诊断是由一位著名的骨科医生根据体格检查,临床和临床旁的发现,如x线摄影进行的。采用调查问卷记录人口统计学信息、疼痛严重程度、随访时间、AO分类、术前术后MCS、AHS、复位不良情况,并采用SPSS软件(version 21)对两组患者数据进行比较。结果:约半数(51%)患者为男性。50.8%的患者重建DL。AO分型最多(53.8%)的患者为b类。在腓骨复位不良发生率、平均疼痛严重程度和AHS方面,行和未行DL重建的患者无差异(P < 0.05)。两组患者术前(P=0.946)、术后(P=0.794)平均MCS无显著差异。重建DL组和未重建DL组的MCS评分平均变化分别为-2.03±0.95和-1.94±0.95 (P=0.606)。结论:深裂重建对内侧间隙无影响。需要对稳定性和生物力学进行进一步研究,以确定哪些损伤需要手术治疗,哪些需要保守治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trauma monthly
Trauma monthly EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Dimensions of the Anterior Column of the Acetabulum with Imaging Criteria in Patients with Surgical Acetabular Fractures Mortality Prediction in Multiple Trauma Patients Using GAP, RTS and NTS Models The effect of Pregabalin on morphine consumption, sleep, mood and ability to change position after colorectal cancer surgery Titanium Elastic Nailing System, An Effective Way Of Pediatric Forearm Fracture Management Diagnostic Salivary Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1