Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome: An opportunity for palliative care

S. Baumrucker
{"title":"Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome: An opportunity for palliative care","authors":"S. Baumrucker","doi":"10.1177/104990910201900203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"is a specialty in search of a niche. Referring providers often do not know what palliative care services do, or how they can help them to care for their patients; misconceptions that palliative care is just for patients at end of life or that it is synonymous with anesthesiology pain services abound. It will take years of providing services that improve the quality of life of thousands before palliative care becomes a household word. Identifying syndromes that are easily ameliorated, affect thousands every year, and commonly go untreated or unrecognized would not only be an opportunity to serve patients, but would provide a chance for palliative care to increase its profile. Due to an apparent statistical fluke over the last couple of weeks, our palliative care service has noted an increase in patients presenting with persistent pain after surgical thoracotomy. The patients, who generally have had moderate, persistent pain over the surgical site, following the intercostal space, report burning, tingling, and occasionally sharp pains that are constant and unremitting. These persons often reported that their surgeon told them that post-surgical pain was to be expected and to “live with it.” Until the creation of palliative care services around the country, patients with similar stories often had no other option. New data have emerged, however, that may improve outcomes and decrease patient suffering over the long term. Chronic post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) is defined as “chronic dysesthetic burning and aching in the general area of the incision that persists at least two months after thoracotomy,”1 and is generally considered to be a post-surgical neuropathic syndrome of one or more intercostal nerves. Up to 60 percent of patients report persistent pain a month after surgery,2 and 35 to 50 percent report pain at one to two years.3 Most patients experience mild to moderate pain; the incidence of severe pain is 3 to 5 percent.4 Given the sheer numbers of thoracotomies performed in this modern age, the data indicate that the number of people suffering chronic sequelae is also large. Women and those with significant pain on post-op day one seem to be at highest risk for PTPS.2 In 1996, Katz followed patients 18 months after lateral thoracotomy and found that early post-operative pain was the only factor that significantly predicted longterm pain.3 The study showed a significant relationship between higher pain scores at 24 and 48 hours and longterm pain. However, cumulative morphine use was similar in both groups. Given that patients with decreased pain in the immediate post-op period had a decreased incidence of long-term pain, it would seem logical that improving post-operative pain control might proactively prevent chronic complications. However, in 2000, Hu published a study that seemed to argue against this concept. Hu’s project, a retrospective review of 159 patients","PeriodicalId":7716,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®","volume":"94 1","pages":"83 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/104990910201900203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

is a specialty in search of a niche. Referring providers often do not know what palliative care services do, or how they can help them to care for their patients; misconceptions that palliative care is just for patients at end of life or that it is synonymous with anesthesiology pain services abound. It will take years of providing services that improve the quality of life of thousands before palliative care becomes a household word. Identifying syndromes that are easily ameliorated, affect thousands every year, and commonly go untreated or unrecognized would not only be an opportunity to serve patients, but would provide a chance for palliative care to increase its profile. Due to an apparent statistical fluke over the last couple of weeks, our palliative care service has noted an increase in patients presenting with persistent pain after surgical thoracotomy. The patients, who generally have had moderate, persistent pain over the surgical site, following the intercostal space, report burning, tingling, and occasionally sharp pains that are constant and unremitting. These persons often reported that their surgeon told them that post-surgical pain was to be expected and to “live with it.” Until the creation of palliative care services around the country, patients with similar stories often had no other option. New data have emerged, however, that may improve outcomes and decrease patient suffering over the long term. Chronic post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) is defined as “chronic dysesthetic burning and aching in the general area of the incision that persists at least two months after thoracotomy,”1 and is generally considered to be a post-surgical neuropathic syndrome of one or more intercostal nerves. Up to 60 percent of patients report persistent pain a month after surgery,2 and 35 to 50 percent report pain at one to two years.3 Most patients experience mild to moderate pain; the incidence of severe pain is 3 to 5 percent.4 Given the sheer numbers of thoracotomies performed in this modern age, the data indicate that the number of people suffering chronic sequelae is also large. Women and those with significant pain on post-op day one seem to be at highest risk for PTPS.2 In 1996, Katz followed patients 18 months after lateral thoracotomy and found that early post-operative pain was the only factor that significantly predicted longterm pain.3 The study showed a significant relationship between higher pain scores at 24 and 48 hours and longterm pain. However, cumulative morphine use was similar in both groups. Given that patients with decreased pain in the immediate post-op period had a decreased incidence of long-term pain, it would seem logical that improving post-operative pain control might proactively prevent chronic complications. However, in 2000, Hu published a study that seemed to argue against this concept. Hu’s project, a retrospective review of 159 patients
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开胸术后疼痛综合征:姑息治疗的机会
是一个寻找利基的专业。转诊提供者往往不知道姑息治疗服务是做什么的,也不知道如何帮助姑息治疗服务照顾病人;姑息治疗只适用于临终病人,或等同于麻醉疼痛服务的误解比比皆是。在姑息治疗成为家喻户晓的词汇之前,还需要多年的时间来提供改善成千上万人生活质量的服务。识别容易改善、每年影响数千人、通常未经治疗或未被发现的综合征,不仅是为患者服务的机会,而且将为姑息治疗提供机会,以提高其知名度。由于过去几周明显的统计巧合,我们的姑息治疗服务注意到在开胸手术后出现持续疼痛的患者有所增加。这些患者通常在手术部位有中等、持续的疼痛,在肋间隙之后,报告烧灼感、刺痛,偶尔有持续和持续的尖锐疼痛。这些人经常报告说,他们的外科医生告诉他们,术后疼痛是意料之中的,要“忍受它”。在全国范围内建立姑息治疗服务之前,有类似经历的患者往往没有其他选择。然而,新数据的出现可能会改善结果并减少患者的长期痛苦。慢性开胸后疼痛综合征(PTPS)被定义为“开胸后切口一般区域持续至少两个月的慢性感觉不良灼烧和疼痛”1,通常被认为是一个或多个肋间神经的术后神经性综合征。高达60%的患者在手术后一个月报告持续疼痛,35%到50%的患者在一到两年内报告疼痛大多数患者经历轻度至中度疼痛;剧烈疼痛的发生率为3%至5%考虑到现代开胸手术的绝对数量,数据表明,患有慢性后遗症的人数也很多。女性和术后第一天就有明显疼痛的患者似乎是ptps的高危人群。1996年,Katz对患者进行了18个月的随访,发现术后早期疼痛是唯一能显著预测长期疼痛的因素研究表明,24小时和48小时疼痛评分较高与长期疼痛之间存在显著关系。然而,两组的累积吗啡使用情况相似。考虑到术后疼痛减轻的患者长期疼痛发生率降低,改善术后疼痛控制可能主动预防慢性并发症似乎是合乎逻辑的。然而,在2000年,胡发表了一项研究,似乎反对这一概念。胡的项目,对159名患者进行了回顾性研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association Between Oral Health Status and Survival Time in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients Hospice news 2005 Cumulative subject index Hospice news Call for manuscripts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1