By devaluing the serological test we throw the baby out with the dirty water

F. Passariello
{"title":"By devaluing the serological test we throw the baby out with the dirty water","authors":"F. Passariello","doi":"10.24019/jtavr.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to a quite diffuse opinion, also amplified by the media, the serologic test has a limited diagnostic value and is of no use as an indication to the booster dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. In addition, this point of view was strengthened by a hasting criticism, which appeared in television, social networks and newspapers and was based on a personal interpretation of a paper published in NEJM Oct 2021. The current article shows how the NEJM paper asserts just the opposite thesis, supporting the serologic test instead. Details are here provided, especially about the effective antibody/infectivity correlation and the possible threshold value between diseased and healthy people. The conclusion is that the NEJM paper strongly supports the serologic test, while the quick criticism derived from a biased lecture, in search of the confirmation of a preconception.","PeriodicalId":17406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical and Applied Vascular Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical and Applied Vascular Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24019/jtavr.124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to a quite diffuse opinion, also amplified by the media, the serologic test has a limited diagnostic value and is of no use as an indication to the booster dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. In addition, this point of view was strengthened by a hasting criticism, which appeared in television, social networks and newspapers and was based on a personal interpretation of a paper published in NEJM Oct 2021. The current article shows how the NEJM paper asserts just the opposite thesis, supporting the serologic test instead. Details are here provided, especially about the effective antibody/infectivity correlation and the possible threshold value between diseased and healthy people. The conclusion is that the NEJM paper strongly supports the serologic test, while the quick criticism derived from a biased lecture, in search of the confirmation of a preconception.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过贬低血清学测试,我们把孩子和脏水一起扔出去了
根据一种相当分散的观点(也被媒体放大),血清学检测的诊断价值有限,不能作为COVID-19疫苗加强剂量的指示。此外,这一观点因出现在电视、社交网络和报纸上的仓促批评而得到加强,这些批评是基于对2021年10月发表在NEJM上的一篇论文的个人解读。目前的文章显示了NEJM论文是如何主张相反的论点,而不是支持血清学测试的。这里提供了详细信息,特别是关于有效抗体/传染性的相关性和患病和健康人群之间可能的阈值。结论是,NEJM的论文强烈支持血清学测试,而快速的批评来自于一个有偏见的讲座,以寻求对先入之见的确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CHIVA Course in Croatia Notes on the virtual Phlebectomy: Conservative REflux Elimination Device (CREED) Sumner’s Hemodynamic Guide to Venous Diagnosis and Intervention Dr Michel Perrin’s obituary An Overview on Venous Valvuloplasty and Saphenous Sparing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1