DIGITALIZATION OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AS A WAY TO ENSURE ACCESS TO JUSTICE

N. A. Razveykina, E. G. Shikhanova, A. Dmitriev
{"title":"DIGITALIZATION OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AS A WAY TO ENSURE ACCESS TO JUSTICE","authors":"N. A. Razveykina, E. G. Shikhanova, A. Dmitriev","doi":"10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-621-627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: rapid spread of the coronavirus infection caused restrictions that have affected all areas of social relations. Russian legal proceedings have also changed significantly. The new context revealed problems in ensuring the work of the courts and administration of justice. The purpose of the article is to analyze the problems of the justice system during the pandemic, in particular, the inability to exercise the right to protection, lack of access to justice, violation of procedural deadlines, technical unpreparedness of courts for the implementation and use of information technologies in justice. Methods: general scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, comparison and classification, abstraction and axiomatic method); statistical methods; special legal methods such as content analysis of legal acts and interpretation of laws. Results: we have analyzed legislation and compared Russian experience with the level of digitalization of judicial systems in foreign countries. The study indicates a low level of digital transformation of Russian legal proceedings and poor quality of the changes that have taken place. The realization of the right to judicial protection appears to be the most urgent problem. Conclusions: the pandemic showed unreadiness of the Russian judicial system for the rapid implementation of information technologies. However, it seems likely that in the short term, due to the information technology development, it will become possible in some cases to abandon the practice of face-to-face hearings on a wide range of cases.","PeriodicalId":42087,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-621-627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: rapid spread of the coronavirus infection caused restrictions that have affected all areas of social relations. Russian legal proceedings have also changed significantly. The new context revealed problems in ensuring the work of the courts and administration of justice. The purpose of the article is to analyze the problems of the justice system during the pandemic, in particular, the inability to exercise the right to protection, lack of access to justice, violation of procedural deadlines, technical unpreparedness of courts for the implementation and use of information technologies in justice. Methods: general scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, comparison and classification, abstraction and axiomatic method); statistical methods; special legal methods such as content analysis of legal acts and interpretation of laws. Results: we have analyzed legislation and compared Russian experience with the level of digitalization of judicial systems in foreign countries. The study indicates a low level of digital transformation of Russian legal proceedings and poor quality of the changes that have taken place. The realization of the right to judicial protection appears to be the most urgent problem. Conclusions: the pandemic showed unreadiness of the Russian judicial system for the rapid implementation of information technologies. However, it seems likely that in the short term, due to the information technology development, it will become possible in some cases to abandon the practice of face-to-face hearings on a wide range of cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律程序数字化是确保诉诸司法的一种方式
导读:新型冠状病毒感染的快速传播造成了限制,影响了社会关系的各个领域。俄罗斯的法律程序也发生了重大变化。新的情况显示出在确保法院工作和司法方面存在的问题。该条的目的是分析大流行病期间司法系统的问题,特别是无法行使受保护权、缺乏诉诸司法的机会、违反程序最后期限、法院在司法中实施和使用信息技术方面缺乏技术准备。方法:一般科学方法(分析与综合、归纳与演绎、比较与分类、抽象与公理法);统计方法;法律行为的内容分析、法律解释等特殊的法律方法。结果:我们分析了立法,并将俄罗斯的经验与国外司法系统的数字化水平进行了比较。该研究表明,俄罗斯法律程序的数字化转型水平较低,已经发生的变化质量较差。司法保护权的实现似乎是最紧迫的问题。结论:大流行病表明,俄罗斯司法系统没有做好迅速实施信息技术的准备。然而,在短期内,由于信息技术的发展,有可能在某些情况下放弃对广泛案件进行面对面听证的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
THE AMALFI CODE (TABULA AMALFITANA): PUBLIC LAW PROVISIONS OF PRIVATE LAW ORIGIN BEHAVIORAL STANDARDS IN THE SYSTEM OF PRIVATE LAW RELATIONS RUSSIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM. A RETURN TO SACREDNESS THE AMALFI CODE (TABULA AMALFITANA): PUBLIC LAW PROVISIONS OF PRIVATE LAW ORIGIN DIVISION OF SUBJECTS OF JURISDICTION AND POWERS BETWEEN THE CENTER, REGIONS AND MUNICIPALITIES IN CONSTITUTIONS OF FEDERAL AND DECENTRALIZED COUNTRIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1