Trust and the sharing economy

Louise Pelgander , Christina Öberg , Louise Barkenäs
{"title":"Trust and the sharing economy","authors":"Louise Pelgander ,&nbsp;Christina Öberg ,&nbsp;Louise Barkenäs","doi":"10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Trust is intimately connected with <em>relational</em> interactions, but does it also have a role to play in <em>transactional</em> exchanges? How would it differ? While trust has been discussed extensively in sharing economy research, the focus has been on trust cues created in exchanges between strangers, thereby approaching trust empirically rather than theoretically. Focusing on user trust, this paper investigates how trust constructs from relational interactions manifest in the sharing economy. This paper bridges sharing economy research with trust as a theoretical construct to investigate the well-established variables of ability, benevolence and integrity as components of trust in the sharing economy. The paper is based on a questionnaire survey of 175 users of Uber's co-driving service UberPop. Descriptive and regression analyses were conducted focusing on user trust in the platform and providers. The findings indicate how trust in transactional exchanges is shaped differently compared with trust in relational interactions. User trust in providers, which diminishes over time, is based on emotional traits, while user trust in the platform is based on functional components. The platform and providers thereby complement each other in terms of the trust created. This paper contributes to research on trust by focusing on trust in transactional exchanges, and to research on the sharing economy by investigating trust based on theoretical constructs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100376,"journal":{"name":"Digital Business","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100048"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266695442200028X/pdfft?md5=19115c4ea8c8900169f32c06cfb54db6&pid=1-s2.0-S266695442200028X-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266695442200028X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Trust is intimately connected with relational interactions, but does it also have a role to play in transactional exchanges? How would it differ? While trust has been discussed extensively in sharing economy research, the focus has been on trust cues created in exchanges between strangers, thereby approaching trust empirically rather than theoretically. Focusing on user trust, this paper investigates how trust constructs from relational interactions manifest in the sharing economy. This paper bridges sharing economy research with trust as a theoretical construct to investigate the well-established variables of ability, benevolence and integrity as components of trust in the sharing economy. The paper is based on a questionnaire survey of 175 users of Uber's co-driving service UberPop. Descriptive and regression analyses were conducted focusing on user trust in the platform and providers. The findings indicate how trust in transactional exchanges is shaped differently compared with trust in relational interactions. User trust in providers, which diminishes over time, is based on emotional traits, while user trust in the platform is based on functional components. The platform and providers thereby complement each other in terms of the trust created. This paper contributes to research on trust by focusing on trust in transactional exchanges, and to research on the sharing economy by investigating trust based on theoretical constructs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信任和共享经济
信任与关系互动密切相关,但它在交易交换中也发挥作用吗?有什么不同?虽然信任在共享经济研究中得到了广泛的讨论,但重点一直放在陌生人之间的交流中产生的信任线索上,因此从经验上而不是理论上接近信任。本文以用户信任为研究对象,探讨了共享经济中关系交互构建的信任是如何体现的。本文将共享经济研究与信任作为理论建构的桥梁,探讨共享经济中作为信任组成部分的能力、仁爱和诚信这三个已确立的变量。这篇论文是基于对175名Uber共享驾驶服务UberPop用户的问卷调查。对用户对平台和供应商的信任进行了描述性和回归分析。研究结果表明,与关系互动中的信任相比,事务性交流中的信任是如何形成不同的。用户对供应商的信任随着时间的推移而减少,这是基于情感特征的,而用户对平台的信任是基于功能组件的。因此,平台和提供者在创建信任方面相互补充。本文通过对交易交易中的信任进行研究,有助于对信任的研究;通过对基于理论构建的信任进行研究,有助于对共享经济的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Building digital platform ecosystems: A synthetization of fundamental design topics from a literature review Realising value from big data analytics: The process of affordance actualisation Sequential film marketing in China: The study of social platforms and their impacts Understanding determinants of digital transformation and digitizing management functions in incumbent SMEs Reinvestment intentions in cryptocurrency: Examining the dynamics of risks and investor risk tolerance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1