Residents’ perception of renewable energy sources - a case study: Temska village, Stara Planina Mountain (Eastern Serbia)

D. Blagojević, M. Radulović, M. Gavrilov, Aco Lukić, D. Santo, S. Marković
{"title":"Residents’ perception of renewable energy sources - a case study: Temska village, Stara Planina Mountain (Eastern Serbia)","authors":"D. Blagojević, M. Radulović, M. Gavrilov, Aco Lukić, D. Santo, S. Marković","doi":"10.2298/ijgi1903271b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Renewable energy sources (RES) have the possibility to regenerate in a shorter time interval than the non-renewable energy sources and that is why they have always been the subject of interest, especially in the last decades. The Republic of Serbia has RES in the form of solar, wind, the power of water flow, geothermal heat, and biomass. The scientific research conducted in July 2016 in Temska village (City of Pirot) aimed to assess inhabitants’ attitudes and awareness of using RES. By interviewing 167 respondents, it is concluded that inhabitants do not have sufficient knowledge of quality and information on RES. Mostly, they are familiar with all terms: hydropower, solar, wind and geothermal energy (over 80%), and the term of biomass energy as well (70.7%). There is an extremely high level of misinformation about the RES subventions that are provided by the Government of the Republic of Serbia (up to 85.6% of respondents are not informed). These subventions are published in the Regulation on incentive measures for the production of electricity from RES and are based on the Feed-in Tariff system that is defined as non-refundable financial assistance from the state. A small number of respondents use RES, but a considerable number (21.6% ‘yes’ and 47.3% ‘maybe’) that does not use RES is interested, or already planning to use it in the future.","PeriodicalId":54076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Geographical Institute Jovan Cvijic SASA","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Geographical Institute Jovan Cvijic SASA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/ijgi1903271b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Renewable energy sources (RES) have the possibility to regenerate in a shorter time interval than the non-renewable energy sources and that is why they have always been the subject of interest, especially in the last decades. The Republic of Serbia has RES in the form of solar, wind, the power of water flow, geothermal heat, and biomass. The scientific research conducted in July 2016 in Temska village (City of Pirot) aimed to assess inhabitants’ attitudes and awareness of using RES. By interviewing 167 respondents, it is concluded that inhabitants do not have sufficient knowledge of quality and information on RES. Mostly, they are familiar with all terms: hydropower, solar, wind and geothermal energy (over 80%), and the term of biomass energy as well (70.7%). There is an extremely high level of misinformation about the RES subventions that are provided by the Government of the Republic of Serbia (up to 85.6% of respondents are not informed). These subventions are published in the Regulation on incentive measures for the production of electricity from RES and are based on the Feed-in Tariff system that is defined as non-refundable financial assistance from the state. A small number of respondents use RES, but a considerable number (21.6% ‘yes’ and 47.3% ‘maybe’) that does not use RES is interested, or already planning to use it in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
居民对可再生能源的看法——以塞尔维亚东部斯塔拉普莱尼纳山Temska村为例
可再生能源(RES)具有比不可再生能源在更短的时间间隔内再生的可能性,这就是为什么它们一直是人们感兴趣的主题,特别是在过去的几十年中。塞尔维亚共和国拥有太阳能、风能、水力、地热和生物质能等形式的可再生能源。2016年7月在Temska村(Pirot市)进行的科学研究旨在评估居民使用可再生能源的态度和意识。通过对167名受访者的采访,得出结论,居民对可再生能源的质量和信息缺乏足够的了解。大多数情况下,他们熟悉所有术语:水电,太阳能,风能和地热能(超过80%),以及生物质能(70.7%)。关于塞尔维亚共和国政府提供的RES补贴存在极高程度的错误信息(多达85.6%的受访者不知情)。这些补贴在《可再生能源发电激励措施条例》中公布,并以上网电价制度为基础,该制度被定义为国家提供的不可退还的财政援助。一小部分受访者使用RES,但也有相当一部分(21.6%的人说“是”,47.3%的人说“可能”)不使用RES的人对此感兴趣,或者已经计划在未来使用RES。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Aspects of tourism sustainability on organic farms in Slovenia Family as a social factor determining demographic trends Determination of winter tourism potential areas in Türkiye using a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis The estimation of flood area based on a few selected and weighted parameters: Case study of the Nangka river basin, Balikpapan (Indonesia) European Capital of Culture Plovdiv 2019: Effects through the lens of the local community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1