Settled Memories on Stolen Land: Settler Mythology at Canada’s National Holocaust Monument

Jason Chalmers
{"title":"Settled Memories on Stolen Land: Settler Mythology at Canada’s National Holocaust Monument","authors":"Jason Chalmers","doi":"10.5250/amerindiquar.43.4.0379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Local and national contexts shape the way people commemorate the Jewish Holocaust. In settler-colonial contexts, Holocaust memory has a tendency to marginalize Indigenous peoples and obscure histories of colonial violence. In 2017 Canada unveiled its first national site dedicated exclusively to the Holocaust—the National Holocaust Monument (NHM)—several blocks away from the federal Parliament buildings in downtown Ottawa. I contend that while the monument ostensibly commemorates the genocide of European Jewry, it also reflects Canada’s ongoing history as a settler state founded on the dispossession of Indigenous peoples from their lands. Proponents of the NHM—monument designers, spokespersons, and political supporters—engage with themes that are central to Canada’s national myth. They frame civilizational progress as the overarching narrative of both human and national history and identify contemporary Canada as the culmination of this history. This narrative marginalizes Indigenous peoples in mutually reinforcing ways: it erases Indigenous peoples from the landscape while at the same time constructing settler society as newly “indigenized” inhabitants. In this way, the Canadian state uses the NHM to legitimize the theft of land while also suppressing Indigenous claims to land.","PeriodicalId":22216,"journal":{"name":"The American Indian Quarterly","volume":"52 1","pages":"379 - 407"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Indian Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5250/amerindiquar.43.4.0379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract:Local and national contexts shape the way people commemorate the Jewish Holocaust. In settler-colonial contexts, Holocaust memory has a tendency to marginalize Indigenous peoples and obscure histories of colonial violence. In 2017 Canada unveiled its first national site dedicated exclusively to the Holocaust—the National Holocaust Monument (NHM)—several blocks away from the federal Parliament buildings in downtown Ottawa. I contend that while the monument ostensibly commemorates the genocide of European Jewry, it also reflects Canada’s ongoing history as a settler state founded on the dispossession of Indigenous peoples from their lands. Proponents of the NHM—monument designers, spokespersons, and political supporters—engage with themes that are central to Canada’s national myth. They frame civilizational progress as the overarching narrative of both human and national history and identify contemporary Canada as the culmination of this history. This narrative marginalizes Indigenous peoples in mutually reinforcing ways: it erases Indigenous peoples from the landscape while at the same time constructing settler society as newly “indigenized” inhabitants. In this way, the Canadian state uses the NHM to legitimize the theft of land while also suppressing Indigenous claims to land.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在被盗土地上定居的记忆:加拿大国家大屠杀纪念碑的定居者神话
摘要:地方和国家背景塑造了人们纪念犹太人大屠杀的方式。在定居者-殖民背景下,大屠杀记忆往往使土著人民边缘化,使殖民暴力的历史模糊不清。2017年,加拿大揭幕了第一个专门纪念大屠杀的国家遗址——国家大屠杀纪念碑(NHM),距离渥太华市中心的联邦议会大楼几个街区。我认为,虽然这座纪念碑表面上是为了纪念对欧洲犹太人的种族灭绝,但它也反映了加拿大作为一个建立在剥夺土著人民土地上的移民国家的持续历史。nhm的支持者——纪念碑的设计师、发言人和政治支持者——参与了加拿大国家神话的核心主题。他们将文明进步视为人类和国家历史的总体叙述,并将当代加拿大视为这一历史的高潮。这种叙事以相辅相成的方式将土著人民边缘化:它将土著人民从景观中抹去,同时将定居者社会构建为新的“土著化”居民。通过这种方式,加拿大政府利用NHM使盗窃土地合法化,同时也压制了土著对土地的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Doodem and Council Fire: Anishinaabe Governance through Alliance by Heidi Bohaker (review) The Enduring Flame: Stress, Epigenetics, and the California Indian 1769–2000 Strawtown Koteewi: Indiana, NAGPRA, and the Culture of Noncompliance Choctaw Confederates: The American Civil War in Indian Country by Fay A. Yarbrough (review) Native American Rhetoric ed. by Lawrence W. Gross (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1