Snow and ice thicknesses derived from Fast Ice Prediction System Version 2.0 (FIPS V2.0) in Prydz Bay, East Antarctica: comparison with in-situ observations

IF 4.2 3区 地球科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Big Earth Data Pub Date : 2021-12-07 DOI:10.1080/20964471.2021.1981196
Jiechen Zhao, Jin-Ming Cheng, Zhongxiang Tian, Xiaopeng Han, Hui Shen, Guanghua Hao, Honglin Guo, Qi Shu
{"title":"Snow and ice thicknesses derived from Fast Ice Prediction System Version 2.0 (FIPS V2.0) in Prydz Bay, East Antarctica: comparison with in-situ observations","authors":"Jiechen Zhao, Jin-Ming Cheng, Zhongxiang Tian, Xiaopeng Han, Hui Shen, Guanghua Hao, Honglin Guo, Qi Shu","doi":"10.1080/20964471.2021.1981196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, snow and ice thickness products derived from an updated Fast Ice Prediction System Version 2.0 (FIPS V2.0) in Prydz Bay, East Antarctica, are introduced and compared with in-situ observations. FIPS V2.0 is comprised of a newly-developed snowdrift parameterization compared to the original FIPS V1.0. The simulation domain covers the entire fast ice region in Prydz Bay and is configured to 720 grid cells, with a spatial resolution of 0.125°. The ERA-Interim reanalysis from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) were used as the atmospheric forcing. The in-situ observations were obtained near Zhongshan Station by the wintering team, and the measurement frequency of the snow and ice thicknesses was around one week. Both the FIPS V2.0 products and in-situ observations introduced in this paper cover the time periods from 2012 to 2016. The primary assessments based on the in-situ observations show that FIPS V2.0 has mean biases of 0.01 ± 0.07 m and 0.23 ± 0.09 m for snow and ice thickness simulations, respectively. The results indicate that the updated FIPS V2.0 produces a reasonable snow thickness due to the newly-developed snowdrift parameterization, but it overestimates the ice thickness due to the cold bias in the air temperature forcing. These 2-D snow and ice thickness distributions provide important references for sea ice thermodynamic studies, remote sensing validations, and icebreaker navigation assessments in this region. The dataset is available at http://www.doi.org/10.11922/sciencedb.j00076.00066.","PeriodicalId":8765,"journal":{"name":"Big Earth Data","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Big Earth Data","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2021.1981196","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, snow and ice thickness products derived from an updated Fast Ice Prediction System Version 2.0 (FIPS V2.0) in Prydz Bay, East Antarctica, are introduced and compared with in-situ observations. FIPS V2.0 is comprised of a newly-developed snowdrift parameterization compared to the original FIPS V1.0. The simulation domain covers the entire fast ice region in Prydz Bay and is configured to 720 grid cells, with a spatial resolution of 0.125°. The ERA-Interim reanalysis from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) were used as the atmospheric forcing. The in-situ observations were obtained near Zhongshan Station by the wintering team, and the measurement frequency of the snow and ice thicknesses was around one week. Both the FIPS V2.0 products and in-situ observations introduced in this paper cover the time periods from 2012 to 2016. The primary assessments based on the in-situ observations show that FIPS V2.0 has mean biases of 0.01 ± 0.07 m and 0.23 ± 0.09 m for snow and ice thickness simulations, respectively. The results indicate that the updated FIPS V2.0 produces a reasonable snow thickness due to the newly-developed snowdrift parameterization, but it overestimates the ice thickness due to the cold bias in the air temperature forcing. These 2-D snow and ice thickness distributions provide important references for sea ice thermodynamic studies, remote sensing validations, and icebreaker navigation assessments in this region. The dataset is available at http://www.doi.org/10.11922/sciencedb.j00076.00066.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速冰预报系统2.0版(FIPS V2.0)在东南极洲Prydz湾的冰雪厚度:与现场观测的比较
本文介绍了基于快速冰预报系统2.0版(FIPS V2.0)的东南极洲Prydz湾地区的冰雪厚度产品,并与现场观测结果进行了比较。与最初的FIPS V1.0相比,FIPS V2.0包含了新开发的雪漂移参数化。模拟域覆盖了Prydz Bay的整个快冰区域,配置为720个网格单元,空间分辨率为0.125°。使用欧洲中期天气预报中心(ECMWF)的ERA-Interim再分析作为大气强迫。越冬队在中山站附近进行了现场观测,冰雪厚度的测量频率在一周左右。本文介绍的FIPS V2.0产品和现场观测都涵盖了2012年至2016年的时间段。基于现场观测的初步评价结果表明,FIPS V2.0对雪厚和冰厚模拟的平均偏差分别为0.01±0.07 m和0.23±0.09 m。结果表明,更新后的FIPS V2.0由于新建立的雪道参数化而产生了合理的雪厚,但由于气温强迫中的冷偏,其高估了冰厚。这些二维冰雪厚度分布为该地区海冰热力学研究、遥感验证和破冰船导航评估提供了重要参考。该数据集可在http://www.doi.org/10.11922/sciencedb.j00076.00066上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Big Earth Data
Big Earth Data Earth and Planetary Sciences-Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Historical reconstruction dataset of hourly expected wind generation based on dynamically downscaled atmospheric reanalysis for assessing spatio-temporal impact of on-shore wind in Japan Long-term (2013–2022) mapping of winter wheat in the North China Plain using Landsat data: classification with optimal zoning strategy Marginal land in China suitable for bioenergy crops under diverse socioeconomic and climate scenarios from 2020–2100 Towards seamless environmental prediction – development of Pan-Eurasian EXperiment (PEEX) modelling platform GEOSatDB: global civil earth observation satellite semantic database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1