The Boston Marathon Bombings: A Case Study in Visual Framing Ethics

IF 0.9 3区 哲学 Q3 COMMUNICATION Journal of Media Ethics Pub Date : 2021-03-24 DOI:10.1080/23736992.2021.1899825
D. Hunt, Gerard Jalette
{"title":"The Boston Marathon Bombings: A Case Study in Visual Framing Ethics","authors":"D. Hunt, Gerard Jalette","doi":"10.1080/23736992.2021.1899825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT On April 15, 2013, two bombs were ignited near the finish line of the Boston Marathon, killing three people and injuring hundreds. The news “frames” used to depict the Boston Marathon bombings have contributed to our collective interpretation of this event. This study adopts a mixed-method approach to understand the ethical nature of the news frames used to represent the bombings. First, content analytic methods were used to codify the visual framing devices employed by newspapers during the aftermath of the marathon bombings. Our content analysis indicated the most frequent image framing devices were crowd reactions and suspects, with headlines focused on the cause of the bombings. A qualitative thematic analysis was then conducted based on in-depth interviews with photojournalism experts. Our thematic analysis resulted in three key themes that guide photojournalism when covering tragic events: storytelling importance, editorial decision-making, and professional codes.","PeriodicalId":45979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2021.1899825","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT On April 15, 2013, two bombs were ignited near the finish line of the Boston Marathon, killing three people and injuring hundreds. The news “frames” used to depict the Boston Marathon bombings have contributed to our collective interpretation of this event. This study adopts a mixed-method approach to understand the ethical nature of the news frames used to represent the bombings. First, content analytic methods were used to codify the visual framing devices employed by newspapers during the aftermath of the marathon bombings. Our content analysis indicated the most frequent image framing devices were crowd reactions and suspects, with headlines focused on the cause of the bombings. A qualitative thematic analysis was then conducted based on in-depth interviews with photojournalism experts. Our thematic analysis resulted in three key themes that guide photojournalism when covering tragic events: storytelling importance, editorial decision-making, and professional codes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波士顿马拉松爆炸案:视觉框架伦理的个案研究
2013年4月15日,两枚炸弹在波士顿马拉松赛终点线附近被引爆,造成3人死亡,数百人受伤。用来描述波士顿马拉松爆炸案的新闻“框架”促成了我们对这一事件的集体解读。本研究采用混合方法来理解用于代表爆炸事件的新闻框架的伦理性质。首先,内容分析方法被用来编纂在马拉松爆炸事件后报纸使用的视觉框架装置。我们的内容分析表明,最常见的图像框架设备是人群反应和嫌疑人,标题集中在爆炸的原因上。然后,在深度采访新闻摄影专家的基础上,进行了定性的专题分析。我们的专题分析得出了三个指导新闻摄影报道悲剧事件的关键主题:讲故事的重要性、编辑决策和专业准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Moral Identity Development Among Emerging Adults in Media: A Longitudinal Analysis In Defense of Journalism and Presidential Debates From Classroom to Global Discourse: New Resources for Media Ethics Character Skepticism and the Virtuous Journalist Inside the Ivory Tower: How Student Journalists Reason About Ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1