Extent of mobile phone use by pedestrians on controlled crossings in central Hobart, Tasmania

E. Pharo
{"title":"Extent of mobile phone use by pedestrians on controlled crossings in central Hobart, Tasmania","authors":"E. Pharo","doi":"10.33492/JACRS-D-18-00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distracted walking is one way that pedestrians increase their risk of injury, but little is known about the extent of the problem. I quantified the extent of phone use by pedestrians over seven hours at each of the 10 signalised crossings in central Hobart. Of the 16,032 people counted, 12.4% of pedestrians were using phones: 4.6% were reading or typing on their phone, 2.3% were talking and another 5.5% were listening to headphones. The latter figure will be an underestimate because of the difficulty of seeing headphones obscured by hats and long hair. At the busiest sites at two ends of a pedestrian mall, there were as many as 155 and 158 people in a one hour period looking down at their phones to read or type. Fortunately these two roads had slow moving vehicle traffic, meaning consequences of crashes would likely be minor. However, four of the sites crossed wide, 50kph, arterial roads, so a combination of responses will be needed to lower crash risk, including education, enforcement and consideration of safe road speeds.","PeriodicalId":43503,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33492/JACRS-D-18-00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Distracted walking is one way that pedestrians increase their risk of injury, but little is known about the extent of the problem. I quantified the extent of phone use by pedestrians over seven hours at each of the 10 signalised crossings in central Hobart. Of the 16,032 people counted, 12.4% of pedestrians were using phones: 4.6% were reading or typing on their phone, 2.3% were talking and another 5.5% were listening to headphones. The latter figure will be an underestimate because of the difficulty of seeing headphones obscured by hats and long hair. At the busiest sites at two ends of a pedestrian mall, there were as many as 155 and 158 people in a one hour period looking down at their phones to read or type. Fortunately these two roads had slow moving vehicle traffic, meaning consequences of crashes would likely be minor. However, four of the sites crossed wide, 50kph, arterial roads, so a combination of responses will be needed to lower crash risk, including education, enforcement and consideration of safe road speeds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塔斯马尼亚州霍巴特中部管制路口行人使用手机的程度
走路分心是增加行人受伤风险的一种方式,但人们对这个问题的严重程度知之甚少。我量化了霍巴特市中心10个有信号的十字路口的行人在7小时内使用手机的程度。在被统计的16032人中,12.4%的行人使用手机:4.6%的人在手机上阅读或打字,2.3%的人在打电话,还有5.5%的人在听耳机。后一个数字将被低估,因为很难看到被帽子和长发遮挡的耳机。在步行街两端最繁忙的地点,一小时内低头看手机阅读或打字的人数分别高达155人和158人。幸运的是,这两条路的车辆行驶缓慢,这意味着撞车的后果可能很小。然而,其中四个站点穿过50公里/小时的主干道,因此需要采取多种应对措施来降低事故风险,包括教育、执法和考虑安全的道路速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
Selected Bibliography Frontmatter Acknowledgments The relative efficacy of positively and negatively valenced road safety campaign messages in improving dangerous driving attitudes Community participation in road safety policy development and strategy planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1