The Eye of the Other in Edmund Burke's Enquiry: Language, Confrontation, and the (Subjective) Body of the Sublime

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION FILM CRITICISM Pub Date : 2021-08-07 DOI:10.13110/criticism.63.3.0223
Ellen Scheible
{"title":"The Eye of the Other in Edmund Burke's Enquiry: Language, Confrontation, and the (Subjective) Body of the Sublime","authors":"Ellen Scheible","doi":"10.13110/criticism.63.3.0223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In the Enquiry, Burke gives voice to a traumatic cultural symptom—an inaccessible yet necessary sublimity—that is bound to his dual role as English and Irish and his understanding of the many versions of subjectivity in eighteenth-century aesthetics. Burke gives further articulation to conventional notions of sympathy by positing the sympathetic sublime as a possible mediator of inflicted and symptomatic traumas—traumas that cannot be reduced or generalized as a unified, theoretical \"trauma\" but instead remain individual regardless of Burke's desire to make them part of a transcendental aesthetic. The necessary distance presupposed by a sublime experience is counteracted by the intimacy of the imagination—we must make a painful experience a personal one in order to sympathize with it—and this intimacy occurs when the subject is confronted by both the gender and language of an other. Such confrontation reconfigures notions of the self and its position within the economy of modern imperialism.","PeriodicalId":42834,"journal":{"name":"FILM CRITICISM","volume":"17 1","pages":"223 - 253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILM CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13110/criticism.63.3.0223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In the Enquiry, Burke gives voice to a traumatic cultural symptom—an inaccessible yet necessary sublimity—that is bound to his dual role as English and Irish and his understanding of the many versions of subjectivity in eighteenth-century aesthetics. Burke gives further articulation to conventional notions of sympathy by positing the sympathetic sublime as a possible mediator of inflicted and symptomatic traumas—traumas that cannot be reduced or generalized as a unified, theoretical "trauma" but instead remain individual regardless of Burke's desire to make them part of a transcendental aesthetic. The necessary distance presupposed by a sublime experience is counteracted by the intimacy of the imagination—we must make a painful experience a personal one in order to sympathize with it—and this intimacy occurs when the subject is confronted by both the gender and language of an other. Such confrontation reconfigures notions of the self and its position within the economy of modern imperialism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃德蒙·伯克《探究》中的他者之眼:语言、对抗与崇高的(主观)身体
摘要:在《质询》中,伯克表达了一种创伤性的文化症状——一种难以接近但又必要的崇高——这与他作为英国人和爱尔兰人的双重角色以及他对18世纪美学中主体性的许多版本的理解有关。伯克进一步阐明了传统的同情概念,他将交感崇高假定为一种可能的被施加的和有症状的创伤的中介——这种创伤不能被简化或概括为统一的、理论上的“创伤”,而是保持个体,而不管伯克希望它们成为先验美学的一部分。崇高体验所预设的必要距离被想象的亲切感抵消了——我们必须把痛苦的体验当成个人经历,才能对它产生共鸣——当主体同时面对另一个人的性别和语言时,这种亲切感就会出现。这种对抗重新配置了自我的概念及其在现代帝国主义经济中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
FILM CRITICISM
FILM CRITICISM FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Film Criticism is a peer-reviewed, online publication whose aim is to bring together scholarship in the field of cinema and media studies in order to present the finest work in this area, foregrounding textual criticism as a primary value. Our readership is academic, although we strive to publish material that is both accessible to undergraduates and engaging to established scholars. With over 40 years of continuous publication, Film Criticism is the third oldest academic film journal in the United States. We have published work by such international scholars as Dudley Andrew, David Bordwell, David Cook, Andrew Horton, Ann Kaplan, Marcia Landy, Peter Lehman, Janet Staiger, and Robin Wood. Equally important, FC continues to present work from emerging generations of film and media scholars representing multiple critical, cultural and theoretical perspectives. Film Criticism is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.
期刊最新文献
Nostalgia, Remembrance and Crises in an Evolving Streaming Media Industry A United Korea (Or, the Great Divide): Crash Landing on You Introduction: Camera Movement and the Necessity of Criticism Festival Aesthetics Amidst Festival Politics The 2023 Busan International Film Festival Sex and Technics: Sexual and Spatial Orientations in <i>Ma vraie vie à Rouen</i>
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1