Aspirations of Relationality: Asian American Studies, American Studies, East Asian Studies, and the Global Anglophone

Daniel Y. Kim
{"title":"Aspirations of Relationality: Asian American Studies, American Studies, East Asian Studies, and the Global Anglophone","authors":"Daniel Y. Kim","doi":"10.1080/1369801X.2022.2161059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If the rubric of the Global Anglophone has come to be largely synonymous with the postcolonial, a development that some commentators have viewed with concern and even alarm, this essay explores a certain politically aspirational potential in the catachrestic elisions this category might engender. For if postcolonial studies has always struggled with a certain exclusionism predicated on how the South Asian context has functioned as its paradigmatic example, then the category of the Global Anglophone might help the field shed its own version of provincialism and develop more expansive geographic and temporal understandings of empire. Drawing in part from the work of Roanne L. Kantor, which bridges South Asian and Latin American studies, this essay explores how this newly ascendant category might help bring the fields of postcolonial, Asian American, and East Asian studies into more explicit alliance. While first acknowledging the potential identitarian tensions that might emerge between Asian scholars hired under the rubric of the Global Anglophone and Asian American and/or Ethnic Studies respectively, this essay ultimately argues for a more coalitional awareness of how seemingly distinct strains and traditions of anticolonial and antiracist scholarship might be relationally articulated to one another.","PeriodicalId":19001,"journal":{"name":"Molecular interventions","volume":"79 1","pages":"619 - 635"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2022.2161059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

If the rubric of the Global Anglophone has come to be largely synonymous with the postcolonial, a development that some commentators have viewed with concern and even alarm, this essay explores a certain politically aspirational potential in the catachrestic elisions this category might engender. For if postcolonial studies has always struggled with a certain exclusionism predicated on how the South Asian context has functioned as its paradigmatic example, then the category of the Global Anglophone might help the field shed its own version of provincialism and develop more expansive geographic and temporal understandings of empire. Drawing in part from the work of Roanne L. Kantor, which bridges South Asian and Latin American studies, this essay explores how this newly ascendant category might help bring the fields of postcolonial, Asian American, and East Asian studies into more explicit alliance. While first acknowledging the potential identitarian tensions that might emerge between Asian scholars hired under the rubric of the Global Anglophone and Asian American and/or Ethnic Studies respectively, this essay ultimately argues for a more coalitional awareness of how seemingly distinct strains and traditions of anticolonial and antiracist scholarship might be relationally articulated to one another.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关系的渴望:亚裔美国人研究、美国研究、东亚研究和全球英语国家
如果说“全球英语国家”这个词在很大程度上已经成为后殖民主义的同义词,一些评论家对这一发展感到担忧甚至担忧,那么本文探讨了这一类别可能产生的重大遗漏中某种政治抱负的潜力。因为,如果后殖民研究一直在与某种排他性主义作斗争,这种排他性主义是基于南亚背景如何作为其范例发挥作用的,那么全球英语国家的范畴可能有助于该领域摆脱自己的地方主义版本,并对帝国进行更广泛的地理和时间理解。本文部分借鉴了罗安妮·l·坎特(Roanne L. Kantor)在南亚和拉丁美洲研究方面的研究成果,探讨了这一新兴的研究类别如何有助于将后殖民、亚裔美国人和东亚研究领域带入更明确的联盟。虽然首先承认在全球英语国家和亚裔美国人和/或种族研究的标题下聘请的亚洲学者之间可能出现潜在的同一性紧张关系,但本文最终提出了一种更联合的意识,即反殖民主义和反种族主义学术的看似不同的菌株和传统如何相互关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular interventions
Molecular interventions 生物-生化与分子生物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Postcolonial Italy, A Public History Project Mapping Colonial Heritage Commemorating the Fascist Empire: The Public Memory of Rodolfo Graziani in Modern Italy Colonial Amnesia and the Material Remains of Italian Colonialism in Mogadishu Dealing with the Material Legacies of Italian Fascist Colonialism in Post-Communist Tirana Constructing and Consuming the Periphery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1