Models of care for pregnant women with opioid use disorder: A multisite pilot study

Sherry Weitzen, Kristin Ashford, Kara McKinney, Jessica Coker, Marcela Smid
{"title":"Models of care for pregnant women with opioid use disorder: A multisite pilot study","authors":"Sherry Weitzen, Kristin Ashford, Kara McKinney, Jessica Coker, Marcela Smid","doi":"10.1370/afm.20.s1.2885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Pregnancy is an opportunity to engage women with opioid use disorder (OUD) in treatment. Models of care (MOC) for pregnant women with OUD vary widely, resulting in challenges for research. Objective: To enhance research capacity, we formed a multi-site collaborative and conducted a pilot study between 4 treatment clinics (UAMS, UK, UNM, UU) with dissimilar MOCs. Presented here are preliminary findings and comparisons of retention in treatment across MOCs. Study Design and Analysis: We conducted a multisite prospective study among pregnant with OUD who were in treatment for OUD during pregnancy. Data were collected during pregnancy at 2 time points. Descriptive statistics were computed. Setting: All 4 sites provided outpatient treatment for OUD among pregnant women; 2 sites provided integrated OUD treatment and prenatal care (Integrated; UU, UNM); 2 sites provided treatment of OUD in coordination with patients’ obstetric providers (Coordinated; UAMS, UK). Population: Eligibility included: > 18 years; gestational age > 22 weeks, receiving medication for OUD, English speaking, consented. Intervention/Instrument: We developed and tested an intake questionnaire administered to participants while waiting for clinic appointments, including social determinants of health (SDH). We collected mental health, comorbidities and demographic data. Outcome Measures: We compared retention in treatment operationalized as completion of questionnaire at second time point between Integrated vs. Coordinated treatment for OUD with prenatal care. We considered SDH as a possible confounder. Results: We reached our recruitment goal of 80 women with OUD who completed the initial questionnaire (UAMS=16, UK=20, UNM=20, UU=24). Mean age was 29; 66% were White, non-Hispanic; 79% graduated from high school; 24% were married; and 78%","PeriodicalId":20389,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy and Women’s Health Care International Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pregnancy and Women’s Health Care International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.20.s1.2885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Pregnancy is an opportunity to engage women with opioid use disorder (OUD) in treatment. Models of care (MOC) for pregnant women with OUD vary widely, resulting in challenges for research. Objective: To enhance research capacity, we formed a multi-site collaborative and conducted a pilot study between 4 treatment clinics (UAMS, UK, UNM, UU) with dissimilar MOCs. Presented here are preliminary findings and comparisons of retention in treatment across MOCs. Study Design and Analysis: We conducted a multisite prospective study among pregnant with OUD who were in treatment for OUD during pregnancy. Data were collected during pregnancy at 2 time points. Descriptive statistics were computed. Setting: All 4 sites provided outpatient treatment for OUD among pregnant women; 2 sites provided integrated OUD treatment and prenatal care (Integrated; UU, UNM); 2 sites provided treatment of OUD in coordination with patients’ obstetric providers (Coordinated; UAMS, UK). Population: Eligibility included: > 18 years; gestational age > 22 weeks, receiving medication for OUD, English speaking, consented. Intervention/Instrument: We developed and tested an intake questionnaire administered to participants while waiting for clinic appointments, including social determinants of health (SDH). We collected mental health, comorbidities and demographic data. Outcome Measures: We compared retention in treatment operationalized as completion of questionnaire at second time point between Integrated vs. Coordinated treatment for OUD with prenatal care. We considered SDH as a possible confounder. Results: We reached our recruitment goal of 80 women with OUD who completed the initial questionnaire (UAMS=16, UK=20, UNM=20, UU=24). Mean age was 29; 66% were White, non-Hispanic; 79% graduated from high school; 24% were married; and 78%
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿片类药物使用障碍孕妇的护理模式:一项多地点试点研究
背景:怀孕是一个让阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)妇女参与治疗的机会。孕妇OUD的护理模式(MOC)差异很大,这给研究带来了挑战。目的:为了提高研究能力,我们形成了一个多站点合作,并在4个不同moc的治疗诊所(UAMS, UK, UNM, UU)之间进行了试点研究。本文介绍了moc间治疗中潴留的初步发现和比较。研究设计和分析:我们在妊娠期接受OUD治疗的OUD孕妇中进行了一项多地点前瞻性研究。数据收集于妊娠期间的2个时间点。进行描述性统计。环境:4个站点均提供孕妇OUD门诊治疗;2个站点提供OUD综合治疗和产前护理(integrated;UU,在野势力);2个站点与患者产科提供者协调提供OUD治疗(协调;UAMS、英国)。人群:年龄> 18岁;胎龄> 22周,接受OUD药物治疗,会英语,同意。干预/工具:我们开发并测试了一份摄入问卷,在等待诊所预约时对参与者进行管理,包括健康的社会决定因素(SDH)。我们收集了心理健康、合并症和人口统计数据。结果测量:我们比较了在产前护理的OUD综合治疗和协调治疗中,在第二个时间点完成问卷的治疗保留率。我们认为SDH是一个可能的混杂因素。结果:我们达到了80名女性OUD患者的招募目标,他们完成了最初的问卷调查(UAMS=16, UK=20, UNM=20, UU=24)。平均年龄29岁;66%是白人,非西班牙裔;高中毕业率79%;24%已婚;和78%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reproductive Care in Community Health Centers: A Multi-Method Evaluation of Illinois Contraceptive Access Now demonstration Assessment of Obstetric Outcomes for New Mainers Recreating the Village: The Patient Experience with Group Perinatal Care Making Decisions about Cannabis Use during Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study Results from the Breastfeeding/Lactation Support for Medical Trainees Policy Implementation Learning Collaborative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1