Definition of Indicators in the Execution of Educational Projects with Design Thinking Using the Systematic Literature Review

Frederico Viana Almeida, E. Canedo, Ruyther Parente da Costa
{"title":"Definition of Indicators in the Execution of Educational Projects with Design Thinking Using the Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Frederico Viana Almeida, E. Canedo, Ruyther Parente da Costa","doi":"10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this Research to Practice Full Paper we investigate whether the application of metrics and indicators can contribute to monitor and verify if a project is performing better when developed using the Design Thinking methodology. Furthermore, we investigate the most appropriate indicators to establish this measurement. To this end, we applied a questionnaire with ten questions, in order to verify the interviewees conceptual level about what is Design Thinking and what are the indicators. From the results, we sought to identify the perception of the interviewees about the use of indicators in Design Thinking, in a more profound way. The questionnaires were carried out in the e-survey format and the analyzes were carried out taking into account the interviewee level of education and the level of knowledge that he/she had in relation to Design Thinking and indicators. The results demonstrated the difficulty of defining specific indicators for projects that use Design Thinking since most of the interviewees did not demonstrate minimal conceptual knowledge regarding the methodology and the Design Thinking process, as well as the definition and application of indicators. However, it was possible to analyze a list of indicators as possible candidates for the application in projects that use Design Thinking, considering that few people have demonstrated to have the minimum conceptual knowledge on the subject and, therefore, this small group of people can not reflect the general context about what are the best indicators for measuring steps in the Design Thinking process.","PeriodicalId":6700,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this Research to Practice Full Paper we investigate whether the application of metrics and indicators can contribute to monitor and verify if a project is performing better when developed using the Design Thinking methodology. Furthermore, we investigate the most appropriate indicators to establish this measurement. To this end, we applied a questionnaire with ten questions, in order to verify the interviewees conceptual level about what is Design Thinking and what are the indicators. From the results, we sought to identify the perception of the interviewees about the use of indicators in Design Thinking, in a more profound way. The questionnaires were carried out in the e-survey format and the analyzes were carried out taking into account the interviewee level of education and the level of knowledge that he/she had in relation to Design Thinking and indicators. The results demonstrated the difficulty of defining specific indicators for projects that use Design Thinking since most of the interviewees did not demonstrate minimal conceptual knowledge regarding the methodology and the Design Thinking process, as well as the definition and application of indicators. However, it was possible to analyze a list of indicators as possible candidates for the application in projects that use Design Thinking, considering that few people have demonstrated to have the minimum conceptual knowledge on the subject and, therefore, this small group of people can not reflect the general context about what are the best indicators for measuring steps in the Design Thinking process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用系统文献法研究设计思维教育项目执行指标的定义
在这篇研究实践全文中,我们调查了度量标准和指标的应用是否有助于监控和验证使用设计思维方法开发的项目是否表现更好。此外,我们研究了最合适的指标来建立这一测量。为此,我们采用了一份包含十个问题的问卷,以验证受访者对什么是设计思维以及什么是指标的概念水平。从结果中,我们试图以更深刻的方式确定受访者对设计思维中指标使用的看法。问卷以电子调查的形式进行,并考虑到受访者的教育水平和他/她在设计思维和指标方面的知识水平进行分析。结果表明,为使用设计思维的项目定义具体指标是困难的,因为大多数受访者没有表现出关于方法论和设计思维过程的最起码的概念知识,以及指标的定义和应用。然而,考虑到很少有人证明对该主题具有最低的概念知识,因此,这一小群人无法反映关于在设计思维过程中测量步骤的最佳指标的一般背景,因此,有可能分析一组指标作为使用设计思维的项目中应用的可能候选指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning professional software development skills by contributing to Open Source projects Development of a teaching plan to support learning activities of exploratory test design and execution Practical Strategies to Mentor around Hidden Curriculum Pathways in Engineering Impact on Second Language Writing via an Intelligent Writing Assistant and Metacognitive Training CURUMIM: A Proposal of an Intelligent Tutor System to Teach Trigonometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1