Evaluating the Effectiveness of Education Aid in Promoting Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education with a Specific Emphasis on the Gender Perspective

Bindeswar Prasad Lekhak
{"title":"Evaluating the Effectiveness of Education Aid in Promoting Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education with a Specific Emphasis on the Gender Perspective","authors":"Bindeswar Prasad Lekhak","doi":"10.5539/jel.v12n5p127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary objective of this study is to examine the relationship between education aid and different levels of schooling, specifically primary, secondary, and tertiary education, from a gender perspective, with a particular focus on Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) four. The study is structured into three main parts: the analysis of female outcomes, the analysis of male outcomes, and conducting a comparative analysis of results between females and males. Firstly, the study analyzes the impact of education aid on completion rates for females and males at the primary level, net enrolment rates for females and males at the secondary level, and gross enrolment rates for females and males at the tertiary level. Subsequently, a comparative analysis of the female and male outcomes is conducted. The study drew data from a 19-year panel (2002-2020) of fifty low and lower-middle-income countries. The system GMM (One-step GMM and Two-step GMM) was utilized for the analysis. Both methods demonstrated a favorable correlation between education aid and primary and secondary education. However, the results suggest that males benefit more from education aid than females at primary and secondary levels. Additionally, the findings for the tertiary level demonstrate that the relationship between tertiary education aid and tertiary education is not optimal. The primary contribution of this study lies in its focused examination of the impact of a specific level of educational aid on particular educational outcomes, with a special emphasis on gender considerations within a comprehensive framework aligned with SDG four.","PeriodicalId":31543,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Education Teaching and Learning","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Education Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v12n5p127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to examine the relationship between education aid and different levels of schooling, specifically primary, secondary, and tertiary education, from a gender perspective, with a particular focus on Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) four. The study is structured into three main parts: the analysis of female outcomes, the analysis of male outcomes, and conducting a comparative analysis of results between females and males. Firstly, the study analyzes the impact of education aid on completion rates for females and males at the primary level, net enrolment rates for females and males at the secondary level, and gross enrolment rates for females and males at the tertiary level. Subsequently, a comparative analysis of the female and male outcomes is conducted. The study drew data from a 19-year panel (2002-2020) of fifty low and lower-middle-income countries. The system GMM (One-step GMM and Two-step GMM) was utilized for the analysis. Both methods demonstrated a favorable correlation between education aid and primary and secondary education. However, the results suggest that males benefit more from education aid than females at primary and secondary levels. Additionally, the findings for the tertiary level demonstrate that the relationship between tertiary education aid and tertiary education is not optimal. The primary contribution of this study lies in its focused examination of the impact of a specific level of educational aid on particular educational outcomes, with a special emphasis on gender considerations within a comprehensive framework aligned with SDG four.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估教育援助在促进包容和公平的优质教育方面的有效性,特别强调性别视角
本研究的主要目的是从性别角度研究教育援助与不同教育水平(特别是小学、中学和高等教育)之间的关系,并特别关注可持续发展目标(SDG) 4。本研究分为三个主要部分:女性结果分析,男性结果分析,以及对女性和男性结果进行比较分析。首先,研究分析了教育援助对小学阶段男女完成率、中学阶段男女净入学率以及大学阶段男女毛入学率的影响。随后,对女性和男性的结果进行了比较分析。该研究收集了50个低收入和中低收入国家19年(2002-2020年)的数据。采用系统GMM(一步GMM和两步GMM)进行分析。两种方法都表明,教育援助与中小学教育之间存在良好的相关性。然而,结果表明,在小学和中学阶段,男性比女性从教育援助中受益更多。此外,高等教育资助与高等教育之间的关系并非最优。本研究的主要贡献在于重点考察了特定水平的教育援助对特定教育成果的影响,并特别强调了在符合可持续发展目标4的综合框架内的性别考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Misapprehension of mathematics among teachers, parents, and elementary school students Assessing ideal teacher’s personality: Students’ perspective and expectations Implementation of a community of inquiry in teaching English as a foreign language in secondary schools: A literature review Status of pedagogical practices in Somaliland higher education institutions The DeLone and McLean model for measuring success in online learning systems: Indonesian evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1