Accuracy analysis of photogrammetric UAV image blocks: influence of onboard RTK-GNSS and cross flight patterns

M. Gerke, H.-J. Przybilla
{"title":"Accuracy analysis of photogrammetric UAV image blocks: influence of onboard RTK-GNSS and cross flight patterns","authors":"M. Gerke, H.-J. Przybilla","doi":"10.1127/PFG/2016/0284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are increasingly used for topographic mapping. Despite the flexibility gained when using those devices, one has to invest more effort for ground control measurements compared to conventional photogrammetric airborne data acquisition, because positioning devices on UAVs are generally less accurate. Additionally, the limited quality of employed end-user cameras asks for self-calibration, which might cause some problems as well. A good distribution of ground control points (GCPs) is not only needed to solve for the absolute orientation of the image block in the desired coordinate frame, but also to mitigate block deformation effects which are resulting mainly from remaining systematic errors in the camera calibration. In this paper recent developments in the UAV-hardware market are picked up: some providers equip fixed-wing UAVs with RTK-GNSS-enabled 2-frequency receivers and set up a processing pipeline which allows them to promise an absolute block orientation in a similar accuracy range as through traditional indirect sensor orientation. Besides the analysis of the actually obtainable accuracy, when one of those systems is used, we examine the effect different flight directions and altitudes (cross flight) have onto the bundle adjustment. For this purpose two test areas have been prepared and flown with a fixed-wing UAV. Results are promising: not only the absolute image orientation gets significantly enhanced when the RTK-option is used, also block deformation is reduced. However, remaining offsets originating from time synchronization or camera event triggering should be considered during flight planning. In flat terrains a cross flight pattern helps to enhance results because of better and more reliable self-calibration.","PeriodicalId":56096,"journal":{"name":"Photogrammetrie Fernerkundung Geoinformation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"149","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photogrammetrie Fernerkundung Geoinformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1127/PFG/2016/0284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 149

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are increasingly used for topographic mapping. Despite the flexibility gained when using those devices, one has to invest more effort for ground control measurements compared to conventional photogrammetric airborne data acquisition, because positioning devices on UAVs are generally less accurate. Additionally, the limited quality of employed end-user cameras asks for self-calibration, which might cause some problems as well. A good distribution of ground control points (GCPs) is not only needed to solve for the absolute orientation of the image block in the desired coordinate frame, but also to mitigate block deformation effects which are resulting mainly from remaining systematic errors in the camera calibration. In this paper recent developments in the UAV-hardware market are picked up: some providers equip fixed-wing UAVs with RTK-GNSS-enabled 2-frequency receivers and set up a processing pipeline which allows them to promise an absolute block orientation in a similar accuracy range as through traditional indirect sensor orientation. Besides the analysis of the actually obtainable accuracy, when one of those systems is used, we examine the effect different flight directions and altitudes (cross flight) have onto the bundle adjustment. For this purpose two test areas have been prepared and flown with a fixed-wing UAV. Results are promising: not only the absolute image orientation gets significantly enhanced when the RTK-option is used, also block deformation is reduced. However, remaining offsets originating from time synchronization or camera event triggering should be considered during flight planning. In flat terrains a cross flight pattern helps to enhance results because of better and more reliable self-calibration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摄影测量无人机图像块精度分析:机载RTK-GNSS和交叉飞行模式的影响
无人驾驶飞行器(UAV)越来越多地用于地形测绘。尽管在使用这些设备时获得了灵活性,但与传统的摄影测量机载数据采集相比,人们必须投入更多的精力用于地面控制测量,因为无人机上的定位设备通常不太准确。此外,所使用的终端用户相机的质量有限,需要进行自校准,这也可能导致一些问题。良好的地面控制点(gcp)分布不仅需要求解图像块在期望坐标系中的绝对方向,而且还需要减轻主要由相机标定中遗留的系统误差引起的块变形影响。本文介绍了无人机硬件市场的最新发展:一些供应商为固定翼无人机配备了支持rtk - gnss的2频接收器,并建立了一个处理管道,使它们能够在与传统间接传感器定向相似的精度范围内保证绝对块定向。除了分析实际可获得的精度外,当使用其中一个系统时,我们研究了不同的飞行方向和高度(交叉飞行)对束平差的影响。为此目的准备了两个试验区,并使用固定翼无人机飞行。结果表明:使用rtk选项不仅可以显著增强图像的绝对方向,还可以减少块变形。然而,由于时间同步或相机事件触发而产生的剩余偏移量应在飞行计划中加以考虑。在平坦地形中,交叉飞行模式有助于提高结果,因为它可以更好、更可靠地进行自校准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Photogrammetrie Fernerkundung Geoinformation
Photogrammetrie Fernerkundung Geoinformation REMOTE SENSING-IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
1.36
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigations of the Geometrical Accuracy of Handheld 3D Scanning Systems Supporting Management of Refugee Streams by Earth Observation and Geoinformation Important Variables of a RapidEye Time Series for Modelling Biophysical Parameters of Winter Wheat Erfassung der früheren und aktuellen Siedlungsdynamik von Hanoi auf Basis von heterogenen Satellitenbildern A Study of the Human Comprehension of Building Categories Based on Different 3D Building Representations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1