Alper Kaptan, Özden Özel Bektaş, D. Eren, D. Doğan, Şükrü Mehrican
{"title":"Influence of Different Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement to CAD-CAM Materials","authors":"Alper Kaptan, Özden Özel Bektaş, D. Eren, D. Doğan, Şükrü Mehrican","doi":"10.15517/ijds.2022.50982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of self-adhesive resin cement when used with two different computer-aided design (CAD)-computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) materials after various surface treatments. Nanoceramic resin Lava Ultimate (LU) and feldspathic ceramic Vita Mark II (VM) CAD-CAM block samples were prepared with 1.5-mm thickness, and a total of 90 samples were obtained (N=90), with five samples of each block. The samples were divided into the following five groups according to the surface treatments (n=9): group 1, untreated (control); group 2,5% hydrofluoric acid etching; group 3, Er: YAG laser irradiation; group 4, tribochemical silica coating (Cojet); and group 5, air-abrasion with Al2O3. After silane application, resin cement was applied on a transparent matrix (diameter, 3mm; height, 2mm) on the blocks. SBS was determined using a universal testing device at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc tests were used to analyze the SBS values. LU showed the highest SBS value in group 4. The average SBS values in groups 3 and were found to be lower than that in the control group (p<0.05). When VM was examined, while all surface treatments increased the SBS values significantly, the highest SBS value was observed in group 4 (p<0.05). This study revealed that all surface treatments used negatively affected the bond strength values of self-adhesive resin cement to LU, except for Cojet application. The SBS values of resin cement with VM increased in all surface treatment application groups.","PeriodicalId":19450,"journal":{"name":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"156 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2022.50982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of self-adhesive resin cement when used with two different computer-aided design (CAD)-computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) materials after various surface treatments. Nanoceramic resin Lava Ultimate (LU) and feldspathic ceramic Vita Mark II (VM) CAD-CAM block samples were prepared with 1.5-mm thickness, and a total of 90 samples were obtained (N=90), with five samples of each block. The samples were divided into the following five groups according to the surface treatments (n=9): group 1, untreated (control); group 2,5% hydrofluoric acid etching; group 3, Er: YAG laser irradiation; group 4, tribochemical silica coating (Cojet); and group 5, air-abrasion with Al2O3. After silane application, resin cement was applied on a transparent matrix (diameter, 3mm; height, 2mm) on the blocks. SBS was determined using a universal testing device at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc tests were used to analyze the SBS values. LU showed the highest SBS value in group 4. The average SBS values in groups 3 and were found to be lower than that in the control group (p<0.05). When VM was examined, while all surface treatments increased the SBS values significantly, the highest SBS value was observed in group 4 (p<0.05). This study revealed that all surface treatments used negatively affected the bond strength values of self-adhesive resin cement to LU, except for Cojet application. The SBS values of resin cement with VM increased in all surface treatment application groups.
评价自粘树脂水泥与两种不同的计算机辅助设计(CAD)-计算机辅助制造(CAM)材料在不同表面处理后的抗剪强度(SBS)。制备了厚度为1.5 mm的纳米陶瓷树脂Lava Ultimate (LU)和长石陶瓷Vita Mark II (VM) CAD-CAM块体样品,共获得90个样品(N=90),每个块体5个样品。按表面处理情况分为5组(n=9): 1组,未处理(对照组);组2、5%氢氟酸蚀刻;第3组,Er: YAG激光照射;第4组,摩擦化学二氧化硅涂层(Cojet);第5组为Al2O3气磨。硅烷涂抹后,将树脂水泥涂在透明基质上(直径3mm;高度,2毫米)在块。SBS采用通用测试装置,十字头速度为1mm/min。采用双向方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后检验对SBS值进行分析。4组的SBS值最高。3组和3组的平均SBS值均低于对照组(p<0.05)。VM检测时,各表面处理均能显著提高SBS值,但以第4组SBS值最高(p<0.05)。该研究表明,除Cojet应用外,所有表面处理都会对自粘树脂水泥与LU的结合强度值产生负面影响。VM树脂水泥的SBS值在各表面处理应用组中均有所增加。