Teachers’ appraisal of various aspects of the efficiency of homogeneous and heterogeneous learning groups

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education Pub Date : 2023-01-06 DOI:10.29333/iejme/12810
Marina Cotic, Daniel Doz, Milena Valenčič Zuljan, Amalija Žakelj, D. Felda
{"title":"Teachers’ appraisal of various aspects of the efficiency of homogeneous and heterogeneous learning groups","authors":"Marina Cotic, Daniel Doz, Milena Valenčič Zuljan, Amalija Žakelj, D. Felda","doi":"10.29333/iejme/12810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present study, we were interested in the appraisal by teachers who have had experience with an individual form of differentiation of the efficiency of grouping learners into homogenous or heterogeneous groups. In the study, seven aspects were thus considered: (1) the learning performance and motivation of learners, (2) the learners’ activity, (3) didactic ways of adapting teaching to diverse learners, (4) the impact on the formation of learners’ personality, (5) cooperation among learners, (6) opportunities for professional development, and (7) cooperation with parents. The research has shown that there is a statistically significant difference between the teachers who teach in homogeneous groups and the teachers who teach in heterogeneous groups in all the seven aspects of the appraisal of the efficiency of grouping learners into homogenous or heterogeneous groups. Regarding most of the assertions, teachers belonging to both groups perceive the way of teaching they perform as having the most advantages.","PeriodicalId":29770,"journal":{"name":"International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the present study, we were interested in the appraisal by teachers who have had experience with an individual form of differentiation of the efficiency of grouping learners into homogenous or heterogeneous groups. In the study, seven aspects were thus considered: (1) the learning performance and motivation of learners, (2) the learners’ activity, (3) didactic ways of adapting teaching to diverse learners, (4) the impact on the formation of learners’ personality, (5) cooperation among learners, (6) opportunities for professional development, and (7) cooperation with parents. The research has shown that there is a statistically significant difference between the teachers who teach in homogeneous groups and the teachers who teach in heterogeneous groups in all the seven aspects of the appraisal of the efficiency of grouping learners into homogenous or heterogeneous groups. Regarding most of the assertions, teachers belonging to both groups perceive the way of teaching they perform as having the most advantages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师对同质和异质学习小组效率各方面的评价
在本研究中,我们感兴趣的是那些有过将学习者分组为同质或异质组的效率的个别形式的区分经验的教师的评价。因此,本研究考虑了七个方面:(1)学习者的学习表现和动机;(2)学习者的活动;(3)适应不同学习者的教学方式;(4)对学习者个性形成的影响;(5)学习者之间的合作;(6)专业发展的机会;(7)与家长的合作。研究表明,同质组教师与异质组教师在对学习者同质组或异质组分组效率评价的七个方面均存在统计学上的显著差异。对于大多数断言,属于这两个群体的教师都认为他们的教学方式最有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic study of mathematical reasoning in novice university students Prior knowledge of a calculus course: The impact of prior knowledge on students’ errors Insights on usability testing: The effectiveness of an adaptive e-learning system for secondary school mathematics The potential of photography for mathematics education and research–A literature review Development and effectiveness of digital classroom assessment document for form one mathematics in secondary school
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1