Longitudinal rates of hospital adverse events that contributed to death in Norway and Sweden from 2013 to 2018

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of patient safety and risk management Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1177/25160435211026125
E. Deilkås, M. Haugen, Madeleine Borgstedt Risberg, H. Narbuvold, Ø. Flesland, Urban Nylén, H. Rutberg
{"title":"Longitudinal rates of hospital adverse events that contributed to death in Norway and Sweden from 2013 to 2018","authors":"E. Deilkås, M. Haugen, Madeleine Borgstedt Risberg, H. Narbuvold, Ø. Flesland, Urban Nylén, H. Rutberg","doi":"10.1177/25160435211026125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives In this paper, we explore and compare types and longitudinal trends of hospital adverse events in Norway and Sweden in the years 2013–2018 with special reference to AEs that contributed to death. Design Acute care hospitals in both countries performed medical record reviews on randomly selected medical records from all eligible admissions. Analysis: Comparison between Norway and Sweden of linear trends from 2013–2018, and percentage rates of admissions with at least one AE according to types and severities. Setting Norway and Sweden have similar socio-economic and demographic characteristics, which constitutes a relevant context for cooperation, comparison and mutual learning. This setting has promoted the use of GTT to monitor national rates of AEs in hospital care in the two countries. Participants 53 367 medical records in Norway and 88 637 medical records in Sweden were reviewed. Results 13.2% of hospital admissions in Norway and 13.1% in Sweden were associated with an AE of all severities (E-I). 0.23% of hospital admissions in Norway and 0.26% in Sweden were associated with an AE that contributed to death (I). The differences between the two countries were not statistically significant. Conclusions There were no significant differences in overall rates (E-I) of AEs in Norway and Sweden, nor in rates of AEs that contributed to death (I). There was no significant change in AEs or fatal AEs in either country over the six-year time period.","PeriodicalId":73888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","volume":"19 1","pages":"153 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435211026125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives In this paper, we explore and compare types and longitudinal trends of hospital adverse events in Norway and Sweden in the years 2013–2018 with special reference to AEs that contributed to death. Design Acute care hospitals in both countries performed medical record reviews on randomly selected medical records from all eligible admissions. Analysis: Comparison between Norway and Sweden of linear trends from 2013–2018, and percentage rates of admissions with at least one AE according to types and severities. Setting Norway and Sweden have similar socio-economic and demographic characteristics, which constitutes a relevant context for cooperation, comparison and mutual learning. This setting has promoted the use of GTT to monitor national rates of AEs in hospital care in the two countries. Participants 53 367 medical records in Norway and 88 637 medical records in Sweden were reviewed. Results 13.2% of hospital admissions in Norway and 13.1% in Sweden were associated with an AE of all severities (E-I). 0.23% of hospital admissions in Norway and 0.26% in Sweden were associated with an AE that contributed to death (I). The differences between the two countries were not statistically significant. Conclusions There were no significant differences in overall rates (E-I) of AEs in Norway and Sweden, nor in rates of AEs that contributed to death (I). There was no significant change in AEs or fatal AEs in either country over the six-year time period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2013年至2018年挪威和瑞典导致死亡的医院不良事件的纵向比率
在本文中,我们探讨并比较了2013-2018年挪威和瑞典医院不良事件的类型和纵向趋势,并特别参考了导致死亡的ae。设计两国急症护理医院对所有符合条件的入院患者随机选择的病历进行了病历审查。分析:比较挪威和瑞典2013-2018年的线性趋势,以及根据类型和严重程度至少有一次AE的入学率。挪威和瑞典具有相似的社会经济和人口特征,这构成了合作、比较和相互学习的相关背景。这种情况促进了这两个国家使用GTT来监测医院护理中不良事件的全国发生率。审查了挪威的53 367份医疗记录和瑞典的88 637份医疗记录。结果挪威13.2%的住院患者和瑞典13.1%的住院患者与所有严重程度(E-I)的AE相关。挪威0.23%的住院患者和瑞典0.26%的住院患者与导致死亡的AE相关(I)。两国之间的差异无统计学意义。结论:挪威和瑞典的ae总发生率(E-I)和导致死亡的ae发生率(I)均无显著差异。在6年期间,两国的ae和致死性ae均无显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB) and safety management systems: An integrated approach to managing safety in healthcare Challenges of integrating patient safety into nursing curricula: An integrative literature review Patient safety near misses – Still missing opportunities to learn A five-step approach to safer skin surgery Gaps in patient safety: Areas that need our attention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1