{"title":"MPPT Full Bridge Converter using Fuzzy Type-2","authors":"Annas Budi Prastyawan, M. Z. Efendi, F. Murdianto","doi":"10.12962/jaree.v5i2.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Renewable energy application using Photovoltaic (PV) is developed as a conversion from solar energy into electrical energy. PV produces output power according to irradiation and temperature conditions. PV has a Maximum Power Point or MPP based on P-V characteristic curve. In certain conditions, PV has an unstable output power then the accuracy of the power generated is not maximum. MPPT method with conventional control is not optimal to resolves power inaccuracies in the system. When the system has a circuit problem, the conventional power converter will be damage. To achieve accuracy and maximize PV output, the Maximum Power Point method will find MPP. Using MPPT Fuzzy Type-2 method on the converter can reliably overcome the inaccuracies and tracking speed of PV power. Full Bridge Converter topology is used as a safety circuit with a high-frequency isolation transformer. Implemented on MATLAB/Simulink software, Simulation results in Model 1 show that the average power accuracy with Fuzzy Type-2 is 91.40% compared to Fuzzy Type-1 with an average power accuracy of 80.64%. In Model 2, Fuzzy Type-2 is 87.63% compared to Fuzzy Type-1 of 77.93%. MPPT method using fuzzy type-2 is better than using fuzzy type-1 in terms of power accuracy.Keywords: full bridge converter, fuzzy type-2, MATLAB/Simulink, maximum power point tracking, photovoltaic.","PeriodicalId":32708,"journal":{"name":"JAREE Journal on Advanced Research in Electrical Engineering","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAREE Journal on Advanced Research in Electrical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12962/jaree.v5i2.197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Renewable energy application using Photovoltaic (PV) is developed as a conversion from solar energy into electrical energy. PV produces output power according to irradiation and temperature conditions. PV has a Maximum Power Point or MPP based on P-V characteristic curve. In certain conditions, PV has an unstable output power then the accuracy of the power generated is not maximum. MPPT method with conventional control is not optimal to resolves power inaccuracies in the system. When the system has a circuit problem, the conventional power converter will be damage. To achieve accuracy and maximize PV output, the Maximum Power Point method will find MPP. Using MPPT Fuzzy Type-2 method on the converter can reliably overcome the inaccuracies and tracking speed of PV power. Full Bridge Converter topology is used as a safety circuit with a high-frequency isolation transformer. Implemented on MATLAB/Simulink software, Simulation results in Model 1 show that the average power accuracy with Fuzzy Type-2 is 91.40% compared to Fuzzy Type-1 with an average power accuracy of 80.64%. In Model 2, Fuzzy Type-2 is 87.63% compared to Fuzzy Type-1 of 77.93%. MPPT method using fuzzy type-2 is better than using fuzzy type-1 in terms of power accuracy.Keywords: full bridge converter, fuzzy type-2, MATLAB/Simulink, maximum power point tracking, photovoltaic.
利用光伏(PV)将太阳能转化为电能,发展可再生能源应用。PV根据辐照和温度条件产生输出功率。PV根据P-V特性曲线有一个最大功率点(Maximum Power Point, MPP)。在某些情况下,光伏发电的输出功率不稳定,因此发电的精度不是最大的。采用常规控制的MPPT方法不能很好地解决系统中的功率误差。当系统出现电路问题时,常规的功率变换器会受到损坏。为了达到准确性和最大化PV输出,最大功率点方法将找到MPP。在变流器上采用模糊2型MPPT方法可以可靠地克服光伏发电的不准确性和跟踪速度。全桥变换器拓扑结构采用高频隔离变压器作为安全电路。在MATLAB/Simulink软件上实现,模型1的仿真结果表明,模糊类型2的平均功率精度为91.40%,而模糊类型1的平均功率精度为80.64%。在模型2中,模糊2型占87.63%,而模糊1型占77.93%。在功率精度方面,使用模糊2型的MPPT方法优于使用模糊1型的MPPT方法。关键词:全桥变换器,模糊2型,MATLAB/Simulink,最大功率点跟踪,光伏