Patterns of Differentiation of Students’ Competencies: A Comparative Study

IF 1.4 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE College & Research Libraries Pub Date : 2020-11-03 DOI:10.5860/CRL.81.7.1061
E. Glowacka, M. Kisilowska, Magdalena Paul
{"title":"Patterns of Differentiation of Students’ Competencies: A Comparative Study","authors":"E. Glowacka, M. Kisilowska, Magdalena Paul","doi":"10.5860/CRL.81.7.1061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study focuses on the issue of how much information competencies are universal in the globalized, internet-connected world, and/or to what extent their perception depends on local conditions and individual needs. The aim of the project is threefold. First, it offers a comparative analysis of the information literacy skills of Polish and Spanish students, regarding both their self-assessment and belief in the importance of information literacy. Second, it focuses on differences and unique IL needs of students of courses rooted in social sciences and/or humanities. And third, due to these differences, it discusses the role of academic librarians in profiled IL training, integrated with the specific courses. Quantitative methodology was applied. The comparative study covered subgroups of humanities and social science students from Poland and Spain. Competencies in information searching, processing, evaluation, and communication/dissemination were taken into account. The results indicate some common ways of perception of valuing information competencies and major differences in assessment of IL self-efficacy. Students’ reluctance to visit libraries is another argument to enhance profiled IL training being realized in close cooperation of academic librarians and the faculty.","PeriodicalId":10686,"journal":{"name":"College & Research Libraries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"College & Research Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/CRL.81.7.1061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study focuses on the issue of how much information competencies are universal in the globalized, internet-connected world, and/or to what extent their perception depends on local conditions and individual needs. The aim of the project is threefold. First, it offers a comparative analysis of the information literacy skills of Polish and Spanish students, regarding both their self-assessment and belief in the importance of information literacy. Second, it focuses on differences and unique IL needs of students of courses rooted in social sciences and/or humanities. And third, due to these differences, it discusses the role of academic librarians in profiled IL training, integrated with the specific courses. Quantitative methodology was applied. The comparative study covered subgroups of humanities and social science students from Poland and Spain. Competencies in information searching, processing, evaluation, and communication/dissemination were taken into account. The results indicate some common ways of perception of valuing information competencies and major differences in assessment of IL self-efficacy. Students’ reluctance to visit libraries is another argument to enhance profiled IL training being realized in close cooperation of academic librarians and the faculty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生能力分化模式的比较研究
该研究关注的问题是,在全球化、互联网连接的世界中,信息能力在多大程度上是普遍存在的,以及/或他们的认知在多大程度上取决于当地条件和个人需求。该项目的目的有三个方面。首先,它对波兰和西班牙学生的信息素养技能进行了比较分析,包括他们的自我评估和对信息素养重要性的信念。其次,它侧重于植根于社会科学和/或人文学科课程的学生的差异和独特的IL需求。第三,针对这些差异,结合具体课程,探讨了高校图书馆员在档案型外语培训中的作用。采用定量方法。这项比较研究涵盖了来自波兰和西班牙的人文和社会科学学生的小组。在信息搜索、处理、评估和沟通/传播方面的能力被考虑在内。结果显示了信息能力评价的一些共同感知方式和信息素养自我效能评价的主要差异。学生不愿去图书馆的现象,是图书馆馆员与教师密切合作,加强形象图书馆培训的另一个理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
College & Research Libraries
College & Research Libraries INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
63
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊介绍: College & Research Libraries (C&RL) is the official scholarly research journal of the Association of College & Research Libraries, a division of the American Library Association, 50 East Huron St., Chicago, IL 60611. C&RL is a bimonthly, online-only publication highlighting a new C&RL study with a free, live, expert panel comprised of the study''s authors and additional subject experts.
期刊最新文献
Welcome from the Editors “Neighborhood Library Modernization”: Public Library Development and Racial Inequality in Milwaukee during the 1960s LHRT’s Two Communities The Library: A Fragile History Record-Making and Record-Keeping in Early Societies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1