Firecracker blast injury to the hand in children: Classification of the thumb injury and the functional outcome assessment

J. Terrence Jose Jerome
{"title":"Firecracker blast injury to the hand in children: Classification of the thumb injury and the functional outcome assessment","authors":"J. Terrence Jose Jerome","doi":"10.1016/j.orthop.2022.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The study aimed to analyze the firecracker blast injury to the hand in children and assess the functional outcome. In addition, the article classified the firecracker blast injury pattern to the thumb in children.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2012 and 2020, analyzing 31 children sustaining firecracker blast injuries. The functional outcome was assessed. The author also proposed a classification based on the injury involving the webspace, flexor pollicis longus, thenar, adductor, and flexor muscles, neurovascular injury, and fractures/dislocations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 30 males and one female with a mean age of 6 years (range 2–13 years). The mean follow-up was 25 months (Range, 12–36 months). The author classified the injury into grades 1 (n = 9 children), 2 (n = 12), 3A (n = 8) and 3B (n = 2) based on the involved structures. All children had better functional outcomes following the reconstructive procedures based on the classification. The grades of injury did not significantly impact the functional outcome (p = 0.96).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite the complexity and multitude of firecracker blast injuries, children performed better. The classification based on firecracker blast injury involving vital structures is simple, straightforward, and meaningful. It is helpful for decision-making at the first surgery and subsequent secondary reconstructive procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>IV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100994,"journal":{"name":"Orthoplastic Surgery","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 93-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X2200032X/pdfft?md5=c5996a08e5ad5c7b2c75ed72c51cb914&pid=1-s2.0-S2666769X2200032X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthoplastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X2200032X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The study aimed to analyze the firecracker blast injury to the hand in children and assess the functional outcome. In addition, the article classified the firecracker blast injury pattern to the thumb in children.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2012 and 2020, analyzing 31 children sustaining firecracker blast injuries. The functional outcome was assessed. The author also proposed a classification based on the injury involving the webspace, flexor pollicis longus, thenar, adductor, and flexor muscles, neurovascular injury, and fractures/dislocations.

Results

There were 30 males and one female with a mean age of 6 years (range 2–13 years). The mean follow-up was 25 months (Range, 12–36 months). The author classified the injury into grades 1 (n = 9 children), 2 (n = 12), 3A (n = 8) and 3B (n = 2) based on the involved structures. All children had better functional outcomes following the reconstructive procedures based on the classification. The grades of injury did not significantly impact the functional outcome (p = 0.96).

Conclusions

Despite the complexity and multitude of firecracker blast injuries, children performed better. The classification based on firecracker blast injury involving vital structures is simple, straightforward, and meaningful. It is helpful for decision-making at the first surgery and subsequent secondary reconstructive procedures.

Level of evidence

IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童手炸伤:拇指损伤的分类及功能预后评价
目的分析儿童炮竹炸伤后的手部损伤,评价其功能预后。此外,本文还对儿童拇指的爆竹爆炸损伤类型进行了分类。方法采用回顾性队列研究方法,对2012 ~ 2020年31例爆竹爆炸伤儿童进行分析。评估功能结果。作者还提出了一种基于网络空间、拇长屈肌、大足底、内收肌和屈肌、神经血管损伤和骨折/脱位损伤的分类。结果男性30例,女性1例,平均年龄6岁,年龄范围2 ~ 13岁。平均随访25个月(范围12-36个月)。根据受累结构将损伤分为1级(n = 9)、2级(n = 12)、3A级(n = 8)和3B级(n = 2)。所有儿童在分类基础上进行重建手术后功能预后均较好。损伤程度对功能结局无显著影响(p = 0.96)。结论尽管爆竹爆炸伤害复杂多样,但儿童的表现较好。基于涉及重要结构的爆竹爆炸损伤分类方法简单、直观、有意义。这对首次手术和后续的二次重建手术的决策有帮助。证据水平:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spino-plastic surgery Erratum regarding previously published articles Editorial Board Composite osteo-tendino-cutaneous reverse radial forearm flap for complex thumb reconstruction: A case report The keystone island perforator flap: An “ideal” local soft tissue flap for the lower extremity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1