Comparison of accuracy of single-crown generated from digital and conventional impressions: an in vivo controlled trial.

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Osseointegration Pub Date : 2019-06-14 DOI:10.23805/JO.2019.11.02.05
A. D. Fiore, M. D. Francesco, C. Monaco, E. Stocco, P. Vigolo, E. Stellini
{"title":"Comparison of accuracy of single-crown generated from digital and conventional impressions: an in vivo controlled trial.","authors":"A. D. Fiore, M. D. Francesco, C. Monaco, E. Stocco, P. Vigolo, E. Stellini","doi":"10.23805/JO.2019.11.02.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim : With the advance of digital technology, intraoral digital impression (DI) technique has become a major trend in prosthodontics with respect to traditional impression (TI) techniques; despite that, very few data are available concerning its accuracy. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of DI versus TI considering both marginal and internal gap (MG, IG, respectively) in cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) single crowns manufactured by mean of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology. \nMaterial and Methods: Thirty posterior teeth were considered for this study. For each abutment tooth, sixty and thirty copings were produced with the aid of TI and DI, respectively. Thirty of the sixty copings of the TI-group were then randomly selected to be veneered and cemented onto existing abutments. The space existing between the internal surface of the coping and the abutment tooth was evaluated onto an in vitro replica; the MG and IG were measured by Scanning Electron Microscope. The data were analysed by the Wilcoxon test (1-tailed). \nResults: The mean MG was 75.04 μm (SD = 13.12) and 55.01 μm (SD = 7.01) for the TI-group and DI-group, respectively. As regards the mean IGs, the values recorded were of 78.36 μm (SD = 19.66) for the TI-group and 59.20 μm (SD=3.33) for the DI-group. A statistically significant difference was found between two groups (p-value = 0.001). \nConclusions: Copings manufactured from DI showed better MGs and IGs with respect to copings produced from TI. However, both approaches produced clinically acceptable results.","PeriodicalId":42724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osseointegration","volume":"478 1","pages":"107-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osseointegration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2019.11.02.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Aim : With the advance of digital technology, intraoral digital impression (DI) technique has become a major trend in prosthodontics with respect to traditional impression (TI) techniques; despite that, very few data are available concerning its accuracy. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of DI versus TI considering both marginal and internal gap (MG, IG, respectively) in cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) single crowns manufactured by mean of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology. Material and Methods: Thirty posterior teeth were considered for this study. For each abutment tooth, sixty and thirty copings were produced with the aid of TI and DI, respectively. Thirty of the sixty copings of the TI-group were then randomly selected to be veneered and cemented onto existing abutments. The space existing between the internal surface of the coping and the abutment tooth was evaluated onto an in vitro replica; the MG and IG were measured by Scanning Electron Microscope. The data were analysed by the Wilcoxon test (1-tailed). Results: The mean MG was 75.04 μm (SD = 13.12) and 55.01 μm (SD = 7.01) for the TI-group and DI-group, respectively. As regards the mean IGs, the values recorded were of 78.36 μm (SD = 19.66) for the TI-group and 59.20 μm (SD=3.33) for the DI-group. A statistically significant difference was found between two groups (p-value = 0.001). Conclusions: Copings manufactured from DI showed better MGs and IGs with respect to copings produced from TI. However, both approaches produced clinically acceptable results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字印模和传统印模产生的单冠精度的比较:一项体内对照试验。
目的:随着数字技术的发展,口腔内数字印模(DI)技术相对于传统印模(TI)技术已成为修复学发展的主要趋势;尽管如此,关于其准确性的数据却很少。因此,本研究的目的是通过计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)技术制造钴铬(Co-Cr)单冠,比较DI和TI在考虑边缘和内部间隙(分别为MG和IG)的有效性。材料和方法:本研究选择30颗后牙。每个基牙分别使用TI和DI制作了60个和30个覆盖。然后随机选择ti组的60个拷贝中的30个贴面并粘合到现有的基台上。在体外模型上评估牙顶内表面与基牙之间的空间;扫描电镜观察MG和IG的变化。数据采用Wilcoxon检验(单尾)进行分析。结果:ti组和di组的平均MG值分别为75.04 μm (SD = 13.12)和55.01 μm (SD = 7.01)。ti组和di组的平均ig值分别为78.36 μm (SD= 19.66)和59.20 μm (SD=3.33)。两组间差异有统计学意义(p值= 0.001)。结论:从DI中提取的冲剂相对于从TI中提取的冲剂具有更好的mg和IGs。然而,这两种方法都产生了临床可接受的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Osseointegration
Journal of Osseointegration DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sealing ability of a bioceramic sealer used in combination with cold and warm obturation techniques Screw-retained restoration of a facially shifted postextraction implant in the esthetic zone with immediate provisionalization Evaluation of marginal bone loss around SLActive implants by CBCT using different implant dimensions and surgical approaches: A clinical and radiological prospective study A minimally invasive approach to osseo-disintegrate implants via thermal energy. An in-vivo pilot study Biomechanical behavior of the dental implant macrodesign in mandibular implant-supported overdentures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1