CONSUMPTION DETAILS OF SYSTEMICALLY ACTING ANTIVIRAL AND ANTIMICROBIAL PREPARATIONS IN PERIOD OF NOVEL CORONAVIRUS INFECTION SPREAD IN RETAIL SECTOR OF SAMARA REGION PHARMACEUTICAL MARKET

I. Petrukhina, P. A. Lebedev, I. Sirotko, T. K. Ryazanova, E. Gladunova, A. Garanin
{"title":"CONSUMPTION DETAILS OF SYSTEMICALLY ACTING ANTIVIRAL AND ANTIMICROBIAL PREPARATIONS IN PERIOD OF NOVEL CORONAVIRUS INFECTION SPREAD IN RETAIL SECTOR OF SAMARA REGION PHARMACEUTICAL MARKET","authors":"I. Petrukhina, P. A. Lebedev, I. Sirotko, T. K. Ryazanova, E. Gladunova, A. Garanin","doi":"10.19163/2307-9266-2022-10-5-446-459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An analysis of the medicinal preparation consumption structure in the period of the COVID-19 pandemic in the pharmacy network reflects the existing outpatient practice and makes it possible to draw generalized conclusions about its compliance with the pharmacotherapy standards.The aim. Comparative analysis of population consumption of antimicrobial and antiviral medicines sold in the retail pharmacies of the Samara region in 2015–2021.Materials and methods. The study was conducted in the retail sector of the Samara region pharmaceutical market. The material of the study was the information on the list of items and dispensing volumes of antibacterial and individual antiviral drugs during the novel coronavirus infection spread (in 2020) in the network of the Samara region pharmacies. The data are compared with the indicators of the drug sales in 2015–2019. Methods of retrospective, comparative, graphical, methodological, content analyzes and statistical methods of analyses were used.Results. The authors have established a significant distortion in the consumption of systemic antimicrobial preparations in the Samara region pharmacy segment in the period of 2015–2019 with the predominance of the ATC (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System) J01D group, primarily cephalosporins (38%), mainly by the parenteral administration route. The share of macrolides (J01F) consumption in volume terms was 14.9%, of fluoroquinolones (J01M) – 11.3%, beta-lactam antibiotics with beta-lactamase inhibitors – 10.7%, beta-lactam antibiotics penicillins (J01C) – 8.1%. Compared to 2019, in 2020, under the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic, the total consumption of AMPs increased by 2.1 times. In the “Other beta-lactam antibiotics” group with a predominant proportion of cephalosporins, there was an increase by 3.2 times, in the “Macrolides and lincosamides” group – by 3.5 times, in “Quinolone derivatives” – by 2.6 times. The noted facts should be assessed as the phenomenon that can have a direct impact on the growth of an antibiotic resistance on a population scale. Among antivirals, the largest consumption increase was noted for oseltamivir and rimantadine. In absolute terms, the volume of antiviral preparations consumption in 2020 increased by 2.4 times, which was accompanied by an increase in the cost of one package by 55.8%.Conclusion. In the period of spreading a novel coronavirus infection, a significant increase in the consumption of antimicrobial and antiviral preparations (up to 20 times for certain pharmacotherapeutic groups and names) was notified, which may negatively affect the growth of the antibiotic resistance in the population.","PeriodicalId":20031,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology & Pharmacy","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology & Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19163/2307-9266-2022-10-5-446-459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An analysis of the medicinal preparation consumption structure in the period of the COVID-19 pandemic in the pharmacy network reflects the existing outpatient practice and makes it possible to draw generalized conclusions about its compliance with the pharmacotherapy standards.The aim. Comparative analysis of population consumption of antimicrobial and antiviral medicines sold in the retail pharmacies of the Samara region in 2015–2021.Materials and methods. The study was conducted in the retail sector of the Samara region pharmaceutical market. The material of the study was the information on the list of items and dispensing volumes of antibacterial and individual antiviral drugs during the novel coronavirus infection spread (in 2020) in the network of the Samara region pharmacies. The data are compared with the indicators of the drug sales in 2015–2019. Methods of retrospective, comparative, graphical, methodological, content analyzes and statistical methods of analyses were used.Results. The authors have established a significant distortion in the consumption of systemic antimicrobial preparations in the Samara region pharmacy segment in the period of 2015–2019 with the predominance of the ATC (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System) J01D group, primarily cephalosporins (38%), mainly by the parenteral administration route. The share of macrolides (J01F) consumption in volume terms was 14.9%, of fluoroquinolones (J01M) – 11.3%, beta-lactam antibiotics with beta-lactamase inhibitors – 10.7%, beta-lactam antibiotics penicillins (J01C) – 8.1%. Compared to 2019, in 2020, under the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic, the total consumption of AMPs increased by 2.1 times. In the “Other beta-lactam antibiotics” group with a predominant proportion of cephalosporins, there was an increase by 3.2 times, in the “Macrolides and lincosamides” group – by 3.5 times, in “Quinolone derivatives” – by 2.6 times. The noted facts should be assessed as the phenomenon that can have a direct impact on the growth of an antibiotic resistance on a population scale. Among antivirals, the largest consumption increase was noted for oseltamivir and rimantadine. In absolute terms, the volume of antiviral preparations consumption in 2020 increased by 2.4 times, which was accompanied by an increase in the cost of one package by 55.8%.Conclusion. In the period of spreading a novel coronavirus infection, a significant increase in the consumption of antimicrobial and antiviral preparations (up to 20 times for certain pharmacotherapeutic groups and names) was notified, which may negatively affect the growth of the antibiotic resistance in the population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
萨马拉地区医药市场零售部门新型冠状病毒感染传播期间全身抗病毒和抗菌制剂的消费情况
通过对2019冠状病毒病大流行期间药房网络制剂消费结构的分析,反映了现有门诊实践,可以得出其是否符合药物治疗标准的概括性结论。的目标。2015-2021年萨马拉地区零售药店销售的抗微生物药物和抗病毒药物的人口消费量比较分析材料和方法。这项研究是在萨马拉地区医药市场的零售部门进行的。该研究的材料是萨马拉地区药房网络中新型冠状病毒感染传播期间(2020年)抗菌和个人抗病毒药物的项目清单和配药量的信息。数据与2015-2019年药品销售指标进行对比。采用回顾性、比较法、图解法、方法学、内容分析法和统计学等分析方法。研究发现,2015-2019年,萨马拉地区药学部门系统性抗菌制剂的消费存在明显扭曲,以ATC(解剖治疗化学分类系统)J01D类群为主,以头孢菌素类药物为主(38%),以肠外给药途径为主。大环内酯类(J01F)的消费量占14.9%,氟喹诺酮类(J01M)占11.3%,含有β -内酰胺酶抑制剂的β -内酰胺类抗生素占10.7%,β -内酰胺类抗生素青霉素类(J01C)占8.1%。与2019年相比,在2019冠状病毒病大流行的情况下,2020年抗菌药物总消费量增长了2.1倍。在头孢菌素占主要比例的“其他β -内酰胺类抗生素”组中,增加了3.2倍,在“大环内酯类和lincoamide”组中增加了3.5倍,在“喹诺酮类衍生物”组中增加了2.6倍。应将所注意到的事实作为可能对种群规模上抗生素耐药性的增长产生直接影响的现象进行评估。在抗病毒药物中,消费量增幅最大的是奥司他韦和金刚乙胺。从绝对值来看,2020年抗病毒制剂的消费量增长了2.4倍,同时每包成本上涨了55.8%。在新型冠状病毒感染传播期间,通报抗菌素和抗病毒制剂的消费量显著增加(某些药物治疗组和名称高达20倍),这可能对人群中抗生素耐药性的增长产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantitative determination of total flavonoids in Glycyrrhiza Glabra L. herbs New role of extemporaneous manufacturing in regulating drug products access onto the market “Off-label” drugs: legal problems and socio-economic aspects of application practice Analysis of cytokine response characteristics and immunopathogenetic effects of double-stranded sodium salt RNA-based drug for postexposure prophylaxis against novel coronavirus infection: double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Development of composition and technology for obtaining antimicrobial composition based on mono- and sesquiterpenoids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1