‘An equal seat at the table’: Service users’ experiences of ward rounds in secure care, through the lens of trauma-informed care principles

Q4 Psychology Clinical Psychology Forum Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.53841/bpscpf.2023.1.364.38
Sophie Rapsey, Ross Watson, Hugh Dafforn
{"title":"‘An equal seat at the table’: Service users’ experiences of ward rounds in secure care, through the lens of trauma-informed care principles","authors":"Sophie Rapsey, Ross Watson, Hugh Dafforn","doi":"10.53841/bpscpf.2023.1.364.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This evaluation aimed to explore the views of service users attending a fortnightly, multidisciplinary ward round meeting on a forensic mental health low secure unit (LSU). The focus was on identifying the ways in which the ward round experience embodied trauma informed care principles. The need for implementing models of trauma informed care has been widely recognised within mental health services. Previous research has demonstrated the negative impact of ward rounds on service user experiences, suggesting a need for change. This evaluation used a focus group followed by semi-structured interviews constructed through the lens of five principles associated with a trauma-informed care approach. Six service users participated in the service evaluation. Interviews were interpreted qualitatively using thematic analysis. Six core themes were identified and are discussed in relation to their application to clinical practice. The themes suggest improvements are required for ward rounds to have a positive impact on service users and promotes the necessity for services to hold collaboration, choice, empowerment, trust and safety in high regard as key principles in embedded ward processes that aim to support recovery.","PeriodicalId":39686,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Forum","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2023.1.364.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This evaluation aimed to explore the views of service users attending a fortnightly, multidisciplinary ward round meeting on a forensic mental health low secure unit (LSU). The focus was on identifying the ways in which the ward round experience embodied trauma informed care principles. The need for implementing models of trauma informed care has been widely recognised within mental health services. Previous research has demonstrated the negative impact of ward rounds on service user experiences, suggesting a need for change. This evaluation used a focus group followed by semi-structured interviews constructed through the lens of five principles associated with a trauma-informed care approach. Six service users participated in the service evaluation. Interviews were interpreted qualitatively using thematic analysis. Six core themes were identified and are discussed in relation to their application to clinical practice. The themes suggest improvements are required for ward rounds to have a positive impact on service users and promotes the necessity for services to hold collaboration, choice, empowerment, trust and safety in high regard as key principles in embedded ward processes that aim to support recovery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“平等坐席”:从创伤知情护理原则的角度看,服务使用者在安全护理中的查房体验
这项评价的目的是探讨每两周参加一次法医心理健康低安全单位多学科查房会议的服务使用者的意见。重点是确定查房经验体现创伤知情护理原则的方式。实施创伤知情护理模式的必要性已在精神卫生服务领域得到广泛认可。以前的研究已经证明了查房对服务用户体验的负面影响,这表明需要改变。该评估采用了焦点小组,然后通过与创伤知情护理方法相关的五项原则构建了半结构化访谈。6个业务用户参与了业务评价。访谈采用专题分析进行定性解释。确定了六个核心主题,并讨论了它们在临床实践中的应用。这些主题表明,需要改进查房工作,以便对服务使用者产生积极影响,并促进服务部门必须高度重视协作、选择、赋权、信任和安全,将其作为旨在支持康复的嵌入式病房流程的关键原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Forum
Clinical Psychology Forum Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Service evaluation of reflective parenting groups: What are parents’ perspectives on the usefulness of RP groups in improving parental mentalisation and reflective functioning? A service evaluation exploring ethnic monitoring in a Specialist Perinatal Mental Health service: Barriers and improvement opportunities Building families through MAR (medically assisted reproduction), donor conception and surrogacy: Where does this fit into clinical psychology? Learning from reflection – good practice in handover with neurodiverse clients Racialised minority women’s experiences of psychological intervention across perinatal and maternal mental health services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1