Are Micro-Analyses of Employment Effects of Innovation Too Optimistic? A Sector-Level Analysis of the Austrian Economy between 2008 and 2012

A. Kaufmann
{"title":"Are Micro-Analyses of Employment Effects of Innovation Too Optimistic? A Sector-Level Analysis of the Austrian Economy between 2008 and 2012","authors":"A. Kaufmann","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2693630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovation – the development of new products and services as well as the application of new technologies – is widely assumed to be an important strategy for securing or improving competitiveness, growth and welfare. Usually, it is expected that rising competitiveness leads to positive effects on employment, particularly through product innovation. Comparing the innovation activity in the sectors of the Austrian economy which is covered by the European innovation survey CIS in the period 2008-2010 with the employment trends in the years of recovery from the crisis in 2009 until 2012 shows that the situation at sector level is more diverse. Regarding product innovation, the sector-level correlation analysis tends to confirm the often stated positive relation between product innovation and employment growth, but there is also a considerable number of opposite cases. Interestingly, there is almost no difference between general product innovations and products which are new to the market. Regarding the employment effects of process innovation, the group of sectors where there is a relation between process innovation and a reduction of employment and the group where such a relation cannot be found are of similar size. However, the results look very different when focusing on explicitly labour saving process innovations. Here the group of sectors with a negative relation between innovation intensity and employment growth is considerably bigger than in the case of process innovation in general.","PeriodicalId":11062,"journal":{"name":"Development of Innovation eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development of Innovation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2693630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Innovation – the development of new products and services as well as the application of new technologies – is widely assumed to be an important strategy for securing or improving competitiveness, growth and welfare. Usually, it is expected that rising competitiveness leads to positive effects on employment, particularly through product innovation. Comparing the innovation activity in the sectors of the Austrian economy which is covered by the European innovation survey CIS in the period 2008-2010 with the employment trends in the years of recovery from the crisis in 2009 until 2012 shows that the situation at sector level is more diverse. Regarding product innovation, the sector-level correlation analysis tends to confirm the often stated positive relation between product innovation and employment growth, but there is also a considerable number of opposite cases. Interestingly, there is almost no difference between general product innovations and products which are new to the market. Regarding the employment effects of process innovation, the group of sectors where there is a relation between process innovation and a reduction of employment and the group where such a relation cannot be found are of similar size. However, the results look very different when focusing on explicitly labour saving process innovations. Here the group of sectors with a negative relation between innovation intensity and employment growth is considerably bigger than in the case of process innovation in general.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新就业效应的微观分析是否过于乐观?2008 - 2012年奥地利经济的部门层面分析
创新- -开发新产品和服务以及应用新技术- -被广泛认为是确保或改善竞争力、增长和福利的重要战略。通常,人们预期竞争力的提高会对就业产生积极影响,特别是通过产品创新。将2008-2010年欧洲创新调查CIS所涵盖的奥地利经济部门的创新活动与2009年至2012年经济危机复苏期间的就业趋势进行比较,可以发现部门层面的情况更加多样化。对于产品创新,行业层面的相关分析倾向于证实产品创新与就业增长之间经常被陈述的正相关关系,但也有相当数量的相反情况。有趣的是,一般的产品创新和市场上的新产品之间几乎没有区别。在工艺创新的就业效应方面,存在工艺创新与就业减少之间关系的部门组与不存在这种关系的部门组的规模相似。然而,当专注于明确节省劳动力的过程创新时,结果看起来非常不同。在这里,创新强度与就业增长负相关的部门组比一般的流程创新情况下要大得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Development Contests Financial Innovation in the 21st Century: Evidence from U.S. Patents Local Technology Adoption and Innovation: The Establishment of U.S. Airmail and the Organization of Aviation Innovation Paying off the Competition: Market Power and Innovation Incentives Conceptualizing Strategic Innovation in a Firm Context: A Theoretical Review and Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1