Communities as inventors: Rethinking positive protection of traditional knowledge through patents

Anik Bhaduri
{"title":"Communities as inventors: Rethinking positive protection of traditional knowledge through patents","authors":"Anik Bhaduri","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traditional knowledge of indigenous communities often overlaps with spiritual traditions in which certain biogenetic resources are understood to be “sacred”. Accordingly, one of the key concerns of these communities is to retain control over the manner in which the knowledge is used so as to ensure that its sanctity is preserved. While much of the literature on the protection of traditional knowledge revolves around defensive protection, some commentators have argued for positive protection using patent law by recognizing the entire community as inventors and vesting property rights in perpetuity with the community as a whole. This paper observes that such positive protection through patents is consistent with the TRIPS Agreement and is likely to be successful in combating biopiracy but suffers from one crucial flaw—even if the community owns patent rights over a biogenetic resource, the community has no means to ensure that a potential licensee of the patent would adhere to the religious protocols of the community. Accordingly, it argues for the incorporation of collective moral rights rooted in indigenous law into the legal framework governing the licensing of traditional knowledge patent with a view to ensuring that indigenous communities can preserve their cultural heritage even after such community patents are licensed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"26 3","pages":"414-435"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional knowledge of indigenous communities often overlaps with spiritual traditions in which certain biogenetic resources are understood to be “sacred”. Accordingly, one of the key concerns of these communities is to retain control over the manner in which the knowledge is used so as to ensure that its sanctity is preserved. While much of the literature on the protection of traditional knowledge revolves around defensive protection, some commentators have argued for positive protection using patent law by recognizing the entire community as inventors and vesting property rights in perpetuity with the community as a whole. This paper observes that such positive protection through patents is consistent with the TRIPS Agreement and is likely to be successful in combating biopiracy but suffers from one crucial flaw—even if the community owns patent rights over a biogenetic resource, the community has no means to ensure that a potential licensee of the patent would adhere to the religious protocols of the community. Accordingly, it argues for the incorporation of collective moral rights rooted in indigenous law into the legal framework governing the licensing of traditional knowledge patent with a view to ensuring that indigenous communities can preserve their cultural heritage even after such community patents are licensed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区作为发明者:重新思考通过专利对传统知识的积极保护
土著社区的传统知识往往与某些生物遗传资源被理解为“神圣”的精神传统重叠。因此,这些社区的主要关切之一是保持对知识使用方式的控制,以确保其神圣性得到保护。虽然许多关于保护传统知识的文献都围绕着防御性保护展开,但一些评论员认为,通过承认整个社区都是发明者,并将产权永久授予整个社区,利用专利法进行积极保护。本文指出,这种通过专利进行的积极保护与《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》是一致的,而且很可能在打击生物剽窃方面取得成功,但存在一个关键缺陷——即使社区拥有生物遗传资源的专利权,社区也没有办法确保专利的潜在被许可人遵守社区的宗教协议。因此,它主张将植根于土著法律的集体道德权利纳入管理传统知识专利许可的法律框架,以期确保土著社区即使在这种社区专利获得许可之后也能保护其文化遗产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information The flexibilization of intellectual property rights in cases of health crises: A case study of Brazil in the face of the AIDS and COVID sanitary crises Factors influencing the prioritisation of access to medicines in trade-related intellectual property policymaking in Thailand Law libraries, copyright and digital lending
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1