How to Handle Health-Related Small Imbalanced Data in Machine Learning?

Q1 Social Sciences i-com Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1515/icom-2020-0018
M. Rauschenberger, R. Baeza-Yates
{"title":"How to Handle Health-Related Small Imbalanced Data in Machine Learning?","authors":"M. Rauschenberger, R. Baeza-Yates","doi":"10.1515/icom-2020-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract When discussing interpretable machine learning results, researchers need to compare them and check for reliability, especially for health-related data. The reason is the negative impact of wrong results on a person, such as in wrong prediction of cancer, incorrect assessment of the COVID-19 pandemic situation, or missing early screening of dyslexia. Often only small data exists for these complex interdisciplinary research projects. Hence, it is essential that this type of research understands different methodologies and mindsets such as the Design Science Methodology, Human-Centered Design or Data Science approaches to ensure interpretable and reliable results. Therefore, we present various recommendations and design considerations for experiments that help to avoid over-fitting and biased interpretation of results when having small imbalanced data related to health. We also present two very different use cases: early screening of dyslexia and event prediction in multiple sclerosis.","PeriodicalId":37105,"journal":{"name":"i-com","volume":"539 1","pages":"215 - 226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"i-com","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2020-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract When discussing interpretable machine learning results, researchers need to compare them and check for reliability, especially for health-related data. The reason is the negative impact of wrong results on a person, such as in wrong prediction of cancer, incorrect assessment of the COVID-19 pandemic situation, or missing early screening of dyslexia. Often only small data exists for these complex interdisciplinary research projects. Hence, it is essential that this type of research understands different methodologies and mindsets such as the Design Science Methodology, Human-Centered Design or Data Science approaches to ensure interpretable and reliable results. Therefore, we present various recommendations and design considerations for experiments that help to avoid over-fitting and biased interpretation of results when having small imbalanced data related to health. We also present two very different use cases: early screening of dyslexia and event prediction in multiple sclerosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习中如何处理与健康相关的小不平衡数据?
当讨论可解释的机器学习结果时,研究人员需要比较它们并检查可靠性,特别是对于与健康相关的数据。原因是错误的结果对人的负面影响,例如错误的癌症预测,错误的COVID-19大流行情况评估,或错过早期筛查阅读障碍。对于这些复杂的跨学科研究项目,通常只有少量的数据存在。因此,这类研究必须理解不同的方法和思维方式,如设计科学方法、以人为本的设计或数据科学方法,以确保可解释和可靠的结果。因此,我们对实验提出了各种建议和设计考虑,以帮助避免在与健康相关的小数据不平衡时对结果进行过度拟合和有偏见的解释。我们还提出了两个非常不同的用例:阅读障碍的早期筛查和多发性硬化症的事件预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
i-com
i-com Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Social anthropology 4.0 The future of interactive information radiators for knowledge workers The future of HCI – editorial Towards new realities: implications of personalized online layers in our daily lives Broadening the mind: how emerging neurotechnology is reshaping HCI and interactive system design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1