Carol B. Aslanian, R. Jonckheere, B. Wauschkuhn, L. Ratschbacher
{"title":"Short communication: Experimental factors affecting fission-track counts in apatite","authors":"Carol B. Aslanian, R. Jonckheere, B. Wauschkuhn, L. Ratschbacher","doi":"10.5194/gchron-4-109-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The tools for interpreting fission-track data are evolving apace, but, even\nso, the outcomes cannot be better than the data. Recent studies showed that\ntrack etching and observation affect confined-track length measurements. We\ninvestigated the effects of grain orientation, polishing, etching and\nobservation on fission-track counts in apatite. Our findings throw light on\nthe phenomena that affect the track counts and hence the sample ages,\nwhilst raising the question: what counts as an etched surface track? This is\npertinent to manual and automatic track counts and to designing training\nstrategies for neural networks. Counting prism faces and using the ζ calibration for age calculation are assumed to deal with most etching- and counting-related factors. However, prism faces are not unproblematic for counting, and other surface orientations are not unusable. Our results suggest that a reinvestigation of the etching properties of different apatite faces could increase the range useful for dating and lift a significant restriction for provenance studies.\n","PeriodicalId":12723,"journal":{"name":"Geochronology","volume":"369 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochronology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-109-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Abstract. The tools for interpreting fission-track data are evolving apace, but, even
so, the outcomes cannot be better than the data. Recent studies showed that
track etching and observation affect confined-track length measurements. We
investigated the effects of grain orientation, polishing, etching and
observation on fission-track counts in apatite. Our findings throw light on
the phenomena that affect the track counts and hence the sample ages,
whilst raising the question: what counts as an etched surface track? This is
pertinent to manual and automatic track counts and to designing training
strategies for neural networks. Counting prism faces and using the ζ calibration for age calculation are assumed to deal with most etching- and counting-related factors. However, prism faces are not unproblematic for counting, and other surface orientations are not unusable. Our results suggest that a reinvestigation of the etching properties of different apatite faces could increase the range useful for dating and lift a significant restriction for provenance studies.