Comparación histopatológica entre biopsia preoperatoria y debulking luego de la cirugía micrográfica de Mohs en carcinomas cutáneos

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revista Medica del Uruguay Pub Date : 2022-06-22 DOI:10.29193/rmu.38.1.7
L. Bermúdez, R. Muguruza, C. Bazzano, J. Magliano
{"title":"Comparación histopatológica entre biopsia preoperatoria y debulking luego de la cirugía micrográfica de Mohs en carcinomas cutáneos","authors":"L. Bermúdez, R. Muguruza, C. Bazzano, J. Magliano","doi":"10.29193/rmu.38.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: histological subtype is a vital element in determining the risk of skin cancer. It may be deter-mined by an incisional biopsy which represents just a percentage of the tumor mass, the main concern lying in its potential failure to detect an agressive subtype. Therefore, comparing the results of biopsies with the surgically obtained piece with Mohs micrographic surgery is significantly relevant. Objective: to compare histopathologic evaluation results of incisional biospy and debulking in skin cancer treated with Mohs micrographic surgery at the Der-matology Service of the Clinicas University Hospital, between November, 2013 and March, 2019. Methodology: retrospective, descriptive study analysing 202 non-melanoma carcinomas which were treated with Mohs micrographic surgery the Derma-tology Service of the “Dr. Manuel Quintela” Clinicas Hospital, between November, 2013 and March, 2019. Results: the study only considered the cases whe-re bulking identified the tumor. Biopsy matched de bulking in 61.39% of cases. Debulking detected an agressive subtype that was not detected in the biopsy in 8.41% of the cases. Conclusions: the hystopathological study of debulking has proved to be relevant, and the incisional biopsy was found to be partially representative in determining the histopathological subtype of non-melanoma carcinomas, since approximately 1 out of 10 carcinomas","PeriodicalId":51931,"journal":{"name":"Revista Medica del Uruguay","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Medica del Uruguay","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29193/rmu.38.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: histological subtype is a vital element in determining the risk of skin cancer. It may be deter-mined by an incisional biopsy which represents just a percentage of the tumor mass, the main concern lying in its potential failure to detect an agressive subtype. Therefore, comparing the results of biopsies with the surgically obtained piece with Mohs micrographic surgery is significantly relevant. Objective: to compare histopathologic evaluation results of incisional biospy and debulking in skin cancer treated with Mohs micrographic surgery at the Der-matology Service of the Clinicas University Hospital, between November, 2013 and March, 2019. Methodology: retrospective, descriptive study analysing 202 non-melanoma carcinomas which were treated with Mohs micrographic surgery the Derma-tology Service of the “Dr. Manuel Quintela” Clinicas Hospital, between November, 2013 and March, 2019. Results: the study only considered the cases whe-re bulking identified the tumor. Biopsy matched de bulking in 61.39% of cases. Debulking detected an agressive subtype that was not detected in the biopsy in 8.41% of the cases. Conclusions: the hystopathological study of debulking has proved to be relevant, and the incisional biopsy was found to be partially representative in determining the histopathological subtype of non-melanoma carcinomas, since approximately 1 out of 10 carcinomas
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮肤癌显微术Mohs术后术前活检与脱粒的组织病理学比较
组织学亚型是决定皮肤癌风险的重要因素。它可以通过切口活检来确定,它只代表肿瘤肿块的一个百分比,主要问题在于它可能无法检测到侵袭性亚型。因此,将活检结果与莫氏显微摄影手术获得的切片进行比较具有重要意义。目的:比较2013年11月至2019年3月临床大学医院Der-matology部Mohs显微摄影术治疗皮肤癌的切口生物活检和减积的组织病理学评价结果。方法:回顾性描述性研究分析了2013年11月至2019年3月期间在“Dr. Manuel Quintela”Clinicas医院皮肤科接受莫氏显微摄影手术治疗的202例非黑色素瘤癌。结果:本研究仅考虑再膨胀识别肿瘤的病例。61.39%的病例活检符合肿大。在8.41%的病例中,Debulking检测到活检中未检测到的侵袭性亚型。结论:肿大的组织病理学研究已被证明是相关的,并且发现切口活检在确定非黑色素瘤癌的组织病理学亚型方面具有部分代表性,因为大约1 / 10的癌
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Medica del Uruguay
Revista Medica del Uruguay MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bioética en donantes en asistolia controlada Sistematización de los resultados de los primeros diez años del Tribunal de Ética Médica del Colegio Médico del Uruguay Síndrome de Burnout en residentes y posgrados de Neonatología en un centro hospitalario de tercer nivel Análisis situacional y seguimiento, período 2021 - 2023 Repercusión de la pandemia COVID-19 en el diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer de mama en pacientes asistidas en la Unidad de Mastología del Hospital de Clínicas Resultados obstétricos y perinatales de la enfermedad materna por COVID-19 Estudio de casos y controles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1