{"title":"Aplikasi Metode Chaid dalam Menganalisis Kecendrungan Penelitian Skripsi Mahasiswa pada Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika","authors":"E. Hasibuan, Adek Nilasari Harahap","doi":"10.32939/EJRPM.V1I2.247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to identify, analyze and map the results of students’ research on mathematics education in 2015-2018. This research used the CHAID algorithm that consists of 3 steps ie merging, splitting and stopping steps. The results of this research were (1) In 2015-2018, 51,9% of the students’ research used the classroom action research and 48,1% else used the descriptive, the analysis and the experiment. (2) 14,1% of the students used media for teaching and learning and 3,7% of them did not. (3) 8,1% were individual research and 5,9% were a collaboration or team research. (4) While the level of school and subject taught in schools did not effect the trend of student research. \n ","PeriodicalId":34056,"journal":{"name":"Edumatika","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edumatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32939/EJRPM.V1I2.247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
This study aims to identify, analyze and map the results of students’ research on mathematics education in 2015-2018. This research used the CHAID algorithm that consists of 3 steps ie merging, splitting and stopping steps. The results of this research were (1) In 2015-2018, 51,9% of the students’ research used the classroom action research and 48,1% else used the descriptive, the analysis and the experiment. (2) 14,1% of the students used media for teaching and learning and 3,7% of them did not. (3) 8,1% were individual research and 5,9% were a collaboration or team research. (4) While the level of school and subject taught in schools did not effect the trend of student research.