The Gods of Politics in Early Greek Cities

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 N/A CLASSICS ARION-A JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND THE CLASSICS Pub Date : 2004-01-01 DOI:10.5422/fso/9780823226443.003.0002
M. Détienne
{"title":"The Gods of Politics in Early Greek Cities","authors":"M. Détienne","doi":"10.5422/fso/9780823226443.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A have decided to speak of \"the gods\" rather than \"religion,\" and the \"political domain\" (le politique) to identify the specific domain that has been recognized as such (to politikon) ever since Aristotle. As for the earliest Greek cities, they constitute the area of my present fieldwork. No doubt you thought, \"Presumably, he's a Hellenist\" . . . and there is, for heaven's sake, surely nothing shameful about being a Hellenist. All the sanie, I should like to make it clear that, very early on, I was lucky enough to embark upon comparative studies. What kind of comparative stud ies? The kind that involves historians working with anthro pologists, and vice versa. But to work as an anthropologist particularly concerned with the comparativist approaches of ethnologists and historians is more complex than it may ap pear.1 When Hellenists hear of someone \"doing anthropology with the ancient Greeks,\" they manifest irritation, and as for historians?I am thinking of mainstream historians, those of our \"major\" nations of both today and yesterday?they too are usually less than enthusiastic, particularly if it is a matter of embarking upon comparativism of a widely ranging na ture.","PeriodicalId":39571,"journal":{"name":"ARION-A JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND THE CLASSICS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARION-A JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND THE CLASSICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fso/9780823226443.003.0002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

A have decided to speak of "the gods" rather than "religion," and the "political domain" (le politique) to identify the specific domain that has been recognized as such (to politikon) ever since Aristotle. As for the earliest Greek cities, they constitute the area of my present fieldwork. No doubt you thought, "Presumably, he's a Hellenist" . . . and there is, for heaven's sake, surely nothing shameful about being a Hellenist. All the sanie, I should like to make it clear that, very early on, I was lucky enough to embark upon comparative studies. What kind of comparative stud ies? The kind that involves historians working with anthro pologists, and vice versa. But to work as an anthropologist particularly concerned with the comparativist approaches of ethnologists and historians is more complex than it may ap pear.1 When Hellenists hear of someone "doing anthropology with the ancient Greeks," they manifest irritation, and as for historians?I am thinking of mainstream historians, those of our "major" nations of both today and yesterday?they too are usually less than enthusiastic, particularly if it is a matter of embarking upon comparativism of a widely ranging na ture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期希腊城市中的政治之神
A决定用“众神”而不是“宗教”,用“政治领域”(le politique)来识别自亚里士多德以来就被认为是这样的特定领域(对政治而言)。至于最早的希腊城市,它们构成了我目前田野研究的领域。毫无疑问,你会想,“他大概是个希腊人”…而且,看在上帝的份上,作为一个希腊人肯定没有什么可耻的。尽管如此,我还是想说清楚,很早的时候,我就很幸运地开始了比较研究。什么样的比较研究?包括历史学家和人类学家的合作,反之亦然。但是,作为一名人类学家,尤其关注民族学家和历史学家的比较主义方法,要比看起来复杂得多当希腊人听说有人“用古希腊人研究人类学”时,他们会表现出愤怒,至于历史学家呢?我想的是主流历史学家,我们今天和昨天的“主要”国家的历史学家?他们通常也不那么热情,尤其是在涉及范围广泛的比较主义的问题上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: MORE THAN humane philology is essential for keeping the classics as a living force. Arion therefore exists to publish work that needs to be done and that otherwise might not get done. We want to stimulate, provoke, even "plant" work that now finds no encouragement or congenial home elsewhere. This means swimming against the mainstream, resisting the extremes of conventional philology and critical fashion into which the profession is now polarized. But occupying this vital center should in no way preclude the crucial centrifugal movement that may lead us across disciplinary lines and beyond the academy. Our commitment is to a genuine and generous pluralism that opens up rather than polarizes classical studies.
期刊最新文献
Image Credits Writing in This Issue Writing in This Issue Writing in This Issue From the Front
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1