Abstract P4-14-12: Outcomes in hormone receptor positive, invasive lobular cancer in the era of endocrine monotherapy

N. Williams, Joseph Liu, J. Stephens, M. Palettas, H. Boutrid, S. Sardesai, R. Reinbolt, D. Stover, J. Vandeusen, A. Noonan, R. Wesolowski, M. Lustberg, B. Ramaswamy
{"title":"Abstract P4-14-12: Outcomes in hormone receptor positive, invasive lobular cancer in the era of endocrine monotherapy","authors":"N. Williams, Joseph Liu, J. Stephens, M. Palettas, H. Boutrid, S. Sardesai, R. Reinbolt, D. Stover, J. Vandeusen, A. Noonan, R. Wesolowski, M. Lustberg, B. Ramaswamy","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-P4-14-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for up to 15% of all breast cancers and is clinically and biologically distinct from invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Despite that, women with early stage ILC are often treated similarly to IDC. However, several retrospective studies suggest that patients (pts) with ILC may not derive survival benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy relative to pts with IDC. The purpose of our study was to compare outcomes of pts with ILC treated with chemotherapy with those who received endocrine monotherapy. Methods: A retrospective review of pts with ILC or pleomorphic lobular carcinoma treated at the Ohio State University James Cancer Center from 2004-2014 was performed. Clinico-pathologic characteristics, treatment summary and clinical outcomes were collected. Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was defined as time from diagnosis to the first distant metastases or death and overall survival (OS) was the time from diagnosis to death or last known follow up. DDFS and OS curves were created using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate univariate and multi variable hazard ratios (HR) for OS and DDFS. Results: We identified 379 pts with early stage ILC (stage I: 43% (162/379), stage II: 34% (127/379), stage III: 22% (84/379), unknown: 1% (6/379)). The majority of pts were post-menopausal (79%), Caucasian (92%) and ER+/PR+ (87%) and HER2 negative (96%). One hundred seventy six pts (46%) received chemotherapy and 189 (50%) pts received endocrine therapy alone. Pts who received chemotherapy had stage II or III disease, positive lymph nodes and grade 2 or 3 tumors; while pts who received endocrine monotherapy had stage I disease, negative lymph nodes and grade 1 or 2 tumors. We found a 51% decrease in chemotherapy (from 63% to 31%) and an increase in endocrine monotherapy use (from 34% to 65%) between 2004-2010 and 2011-2014. One hundred thirty two pts were evaluated with Oncotype DX, of which 76% (100/132) were node negative with the majority having a low recurrence score (low: 64%; intermediate: 33%; high: 3%). The use of Oncotype DX increased from 21.1% in 2004-2010 to 47.9% in 2011-2014. We found that 112 of 149 pts with at least 5 years follow up (75.2%) successfully completed five or more years of endocrine therapy. Univariate cox models showed worse DDFS HRs for type of therapy and node status (HR: 2.36, p=0.005, HR: 4.16, p Conclusion: We found no difference in DDFS between endocrine monotherapy and chemotherapy after adjusting for age, grade, and nodal involvement in pts with early stage ILC. This supports the hypothesis that ILC may not derive a significant benefit from the addition of chemotherapy. We need more prospective clinical trials considering histology to better understand how best to treat ILC. Citation Format: Williams N, Liu J, Stephens J, Palettas M, Boutrid H, Sardesai S, Reinbolt R, Stover D, VanDeusen J, Noonan A, Wesolowski R, Lustberg M, Ramaswamy B. Outcomes in hormone receptor positive, invasive lobular cancer in the era of endocrine monotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-14-12.","PeriodicalId":20307,"journal":{"name":"Poster Session Abstracts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poster Session Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-P4-14-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background:Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for up to 15% of all breast cancers and is clinically and biologically distinct from invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Despite that, women with early stage ILC are often treated similarly to IDC. However, several retrospective studies suggest that patients (pts) with ILC may not derive survival benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy relative to pts with IDC. The purpose of our study was to compare outcomes of pts with ILC treated with chemotherapy with those who received endocrine monotherapy. Methods: A retrospective review of pts with ILC or pleomorphic lobular carcinoma treated at the Ohio State University James Cancer Center from 2004-2014 was performed. Clinico-pathologic characteristics, treatment summary and clinical outcomes were collected. Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was defined as time from diagnosis to the first distant metastases or death and overall survival (OS) was the time from diagnosis to death or last known follow up. DDFS and OS curves were created using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate univariate and multi variable hazard ratios (HR) for OS and DDFS. Results: We identified 379 pts with early stage ILC (stage I: 43% (162/379), stage II: 34% (127/379), stage III: 22% (84/379), unknown: 1% (6/379)). The majority of pts were post-menopausal (79%), Caucasian (92%) and ER+/PR+ (87%) and HER2 negative (96%). One hundred seventy six pts (46%) received chemotherapy and 189 (50%) pts received endocrine therapy alone. Pts who received chemotherapy had stage II or III disease, positive lymph nodes and grade 2 or 3 tumors; while pts who received endocrine monotherapy had stage I disease, negative lymph nodes and grade 1 or 2 tumors. We found a 51% decrease in chemotherapy (from 63% to 31%) and an increase in endocrine monotherapy use (from 34% to 65%) between 2004-2010 and 2011-2014. One hundred thirty two pts were evaluated with Oncotype DX, of which 76% (100/132) were node negative with the majority having a low recurrence score (low: 64%; intermediate: 33%; high: 3%). The use of Oncotype DX increased from 21.1% in 2004-2010 to 47.9% in 2011-2014. We found that 112 of 149 pts with at least 5 years follow up (75.2%) successfully completed five or more years of endocrine therapy. Univariate cox models showed worse DDFS HRs for type of therapy and node status (HR: 2.36, p=0.005, HR: 4.16, p Conclusion: We found no difference in DDFS between endocrine monotherapy and chemotherapy after adjusting for age, grade, and nodal involvement in pts with early stage ILC. This supports the hypothesis that ILC may not derive a significant benefit from the addition of chemotherapy. We need more prospective clinical trials considering histology to better understand how best to treat ILC. Citation Format: Williams N, Liu J, Stephens J, Palettas M, Boutrid H, Sardesai S, Reinbolt R, Stover D, VanDeusen J, Noonan A, Wesolowski R, Lustberg M, Ramaswamy B. Outcomes in hormone receptor positive, invasive lobular cancer in the era of endocrine monotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-14-12.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摘要P4-14-12:激素受体阳性侵袭性小叶癌在内分泌单一治疗时代的预后
背景:浸润性小叶癌(ILC)占所有乳腺癌的15%,在临床和生物学上不同于浸润性导管癌(IDC)。尽管如此,早期ILC的女性通常与IDC的治疗方法相似。然而,一些回顾性研究表明,相对于IDC患者,ILC患者可能无法从在内分泌治疗中增加化疗中获得生存益处。本研究的目的是比较接受化疗的ILC患者与接受内分泌单一疗法的患者的预后。方法:回顾性分析2004-2014年在俄亥俄州立大学詹姆斯癌症中心治疗的ILC或多形性小叶癌患者。收集临床病理特征、治疗总结及临床结果。远端无病生存期(DDFS)定义为从诊断到首次远处转移或死亡的时间,总生存期(OS)定义为从诊断到死亡或最后一次已知随访的时间。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制DDFS和OS曲线,并用log-rank检验进行比较。采用Cox比例风险模型计算OS和DDFS的单因素和多因素风险比(HR)。结果:我们确定了379例早期ILC患者(I期:43% (162/379),II期:34% (127/379),III期:22%(84/379),未知:1%(6/379))。大多数患者为绝经后(79%)、白种人(92%)、ER+/PR+(87%)和HER2阴性(96%)。176例(46%)接受化疗,189例(50%)单独接受内分泌治疗。接受化疗的患者为II期或III期疾病、淋巴结阳性和2级或3级肿瘤;而接受内分泌单一疗法的患者为I期疾病、淋巴结阴性和1级或2级肿瘤。我们发现,2004-2010年至2011-2014年间,化疗减少了51%(从63%降至31%),而内分泌单一疗法的使用增加了(从34%降至65%)。132名患者接受Oncotype DX评估,其中76%(100/132)为淋巴结阴性,大多数复发评分较低(低:64%;中级:33%;高:3%)。Oncotype DX的使用率从2004-2010年的21.1%上升到2011-2014年的47.9%。我们发现,随访至少5年的149名患者中,有112名(75.2%)成功完成了5年或更长时间的内分泌治疗。单因素cox模型显示,治疗类型和淋巴结状态的DDFS HRs更差(HR: 2.36, p=0.005, HR: 4.16, p)。结论:在调整年龄、分级和早期ILC患者的淋巴结累及后,我们发现内分泌单药治疗和化疗的DDFS无差异。这支持了ILC可能不会从增加化疗中获得显着益处的假设。我们需要更多考虑组织学的前瞻性临床试验,以更好地了解如何最好地治疗ILC。引用格式:Williams N, Liu J, Stephens J, Palettas M, Boutrid H, Sardesai S, Reinbolt R, Stover D, VanDeusen J, Noonan A, Wesolowski R, Lustberg M, Ramaswamy B.激素受体阳性侵袭性小叶癌的预后[摘要]。2018年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2018年12月4-8日;费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(4增刊):P4-14-12。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract PS6-01: How low is low risk: MINDACT updated outcome and treatment benefit in patients considered clinical low risk and stratified by genomic signature, age and nodal status Abstract PS14-01: Radium-223 in women with HR-positive bone-metastatic breast cancer receiving endocrine therapy: International phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Abstract PS6-25: Cts5 tested in a Brazilian population: A tool that can predict global survival in early breast cancer ER+/HER2-, as well as the response to extended endocrine therapy Abstract PS1-32: A multicentre prospective feasibility study of carbon dye tattooing of biopsied axillary node and surgical localisation in breast cancer patients Abstract PS12-09: Pre-operative pembrolizumab (Pembro) with radiation therapy (RT) in patients with operable triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1