Feature extraction from three-dimensional images in quantitative microscopy

Steven S.S. Poon , Rabab K. Ward , Branko Palcic
{"title":"Feature extraction from three-dimensional images in quantitative microscopy","authors":"Steven S.S. Poon ,&nbsp;Rabab K. Ward ,&nbsp;Branko Palcic","doi":"10.1016/0739-6260(92)90022-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Different methods are investigated in selecting and generating the appropriate microscope images for analysis of three-dimensional objects in quantitative microscopy. Traditionally, the ‘best’ focused image from a set is used for quantitative analysis. Such an objectively determined image is optimal for the extraction of some features, but may not be the best image for the extraction of all features. Various methods using multiple images are here developed to obtain a tighter distribution for all features.</p><p>Three different approaches for analysis of images of stained cervical cells were analyzed. In the first approach, features are extracted from each image in the set. The feature values are then averaged to give the final result. In the second approach, a set of varying focused images are reconstructed to obtain a set of in-focus images. Features are then extracted from this set and averaged. In the third approach, a set of images in the three-dimensional scene is compressed into a single two-dimensional image. Four different compression methods are used. Features are then extracted from the resulting two-dimensional image. The third approach is employed on both the raw and transformed images.</p><p>Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages. The first approach is fast and produces reasonable results. The second approach is more computationally expensive but produces the best results. The last approach overcomes the memory storage problem of the first two approaches since the set of images is compressed into one. The method of compression using the highest gradient pixel produces better results overall than other data reduction techniques and produces results comparable to the first approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100925,"journal":{"name":"Micron and Microscopica Acta","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0739-6260(92)90022-6","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Micron and Microscopica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0739626092900226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Different methods are investigated in selecting and generating the appropriate microscope images for analysis of three-dimensional objects in quantitative microscopy. Traditionally, the ‘best’ focused image from a set is used for quantitative analysis. Such an objectively determined image is optimal for the extraction of some features, but may not be the best image for the extraction of all features. Various methods using multiple images are here developed to obtain a tighter distribution for all features.

Three different approaches for analysis of images of stained cervical cells were analyzed. In the first approach, features are extracted from each image in the set. The feature values are then averaged to give the final result. In the second approach, a set of varying focused images are reconstructed to obtain a set of in-focus images. Features are then extracted from this set and averaged. In the third approach, a set of images in the three-dimensional scene is compressed into a single two-dimensional image. Four different compression methods are used. Features are then extracted from the resulting two-dimensional image. The third approach is employed on both the raw and transformed images.

Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages. The first approach is fast and produces reasonable results. The second approach is more computationally expensive but produces the best results. The last approach overcomes the memory storage problem of the first two approaches since the set of images is compressed into one. The method of compression using the highest gradient pixel produces better results overall than other data reduction techniques and produces results comparable to the first approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定量显微镜中三维图像的特征提取
不同的方法被研究在选择和产生适当的显微镜图像分析三维物体在定量显微镜。传统上,从一组“最佳”聚焦图像用于定量分析。这样一个客观确定的图像对于某些特征的提取是最优的,但可能不是提取所有特征的最佳图像。这里开发了使用多个图像的各种方法,以获得所有特征的更紧密分布。分析了三种不同的方法来分析宫颈细胞染色图像。在第一种方法中,从集合中的每个图像中提取特征。然后对特征值求平均值,得到最终结果。在第二种方法中,重构一组不同聚焦的图像以获得一组聚焦内的图像。然后从这个集合中提取特征并取平均值。在第三种方法中,将三维场景中的一组图像压缩成单个二维图像。使用了四种不同的压缩方法。然后从生成的二维图像中提取特征。第三种方法用于原始图像和转换后的图像。每种方法都有其优点和缺点。第一种方法快速且产生合理的结果。第二种方法的计算成本更高,但产生的结果最好。最后一种方法克服了前两种方法的内存问题,因为图像集被压缩成一个图像集。使用最高梯度像素的压缩方法总体上比其他数据缩减技术产生更好的结果,并且产生与第一种方法相当的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Instructions to authors Editorial Board Introduction Confocal microscopy via reciprocal optical fibre image detection Analysis of CVD diamond using TEM and parallel EELS in a STEM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1