Health literacy and empowerment in the COVID-19 era

Q3 Social Sciences Information Services and Use Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI:10.3233/isu-230186
Sandra A. Smith, Elena T. Carbone
{"title":"Health literacy and empowerment in the COVID-19 era","authors":"Sandra A. Smith, Elena T. Carbone","doi":"10.3233/isu-230186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic presented a teachable moment to empower citizens to assess and apply information to protect their health by promoting critical health literacy. Most Americans took preventive measures, suggesting some overall increase in critical health literacy around infectious disease. Simultaneously, however, a torrent of misinformation, disinformation and malinformation intentionally buried facts, sewed doubt and confusion, promoted lies and conspiracies, and undermined health authorities and institutions. The authors discuss how this ‘infodemic’ rose from previously localized, unconnected anti-vaccination, anti-government, and anti-science groups galvanized by the pandemic. Prominent politicians seeking political gain lent the power of their offices to the movement, layering a ‘polidemic’ onto the infodemic and overwhelming inconsistent public health messaging. Even those with strong health literacy skills were challenged. Millions were misled to over-confidently self-manage their risk, revealing the possibility and perils of empowerment in the absence of critical health literacy skills – negative empowerment. The roots of resistance to the government response to COVID-19, and conditions that fostered its influence are examined, followed by recommendations to position health literacy scholars and practitioners to better meet communication challenges and opportunities in future crises.","PeriodicalId":39698,"journal":{"name":"Information Services and Use","volume":"122 1","pages":"89-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Services and Use","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/isu-230186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic presented a teachable moment to empower citizens to assess and apply information to protect their health by promoting critical health literacy. Most Americans took preventive measures, suggesting some overall increase in critical health literacy around infectious disease. Simultaneously, however, a torrent of misinformation, disinformation and malinformation intentionally buried facts, sewed doubt and confusion, promoted lies and conspiracies, and undermined health authorities and institutions. The authors discuss how this ‘infodemic’ rose from previously localized, unconnected anti-vaccination, anti-government, and anti-science groups galvanized by the pandemic. Prominent politicians seeking political gain lent the power of their offices to the movement, layering a ‘polidemic’ onto the infodemic and overwhelming inconsistent public health messaging. Even those with strong health literacy skills were challenged. Millions were misled to over-confidently self-manage their risk, revealing the possibility and perils of empowerment in the absence of critical health literacy skills – negative empowerment. The roots of resistance to the government response to COVID-19, and conditions that fostered its influence are examined, followed by recommendations to position health literacy scholars and practitioners to better meet communication challenges and opportunities in future crises.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19时代的卫生素养和赋权
2019冠状病毒病大流行提供了一个教育时机,使公民能够通过促进关键的卫生素养来评估和应用信息,以保护自己的健康。大多数美国人都采取了预防措施,这表明围绕传染病的关键健康素养总体上有所提高。然而,与此同时,大量的错误信息、虚假信息和恶意信息故意掩盖事实,制造怀疑和混乱,助长谎言和阴谋,并破坏卫生当局和机构。这组作者讨论了这种“信息大流行”是如何从以前局部的、互不关联的反疫苗、反政府和反科学团体中兴起的。寻求政治利益的著名政治家将其办公室的权力赋予了这场运动,将“流行病”叠加在信息流行病上,并压倒了不一致的公共卫生信息。即使是那些拥有强大卫生知识技能的人也面临挑战。数百万人被误导,过度自信地自我管理风险,暴露了在缺乏关键的卫生知识素养技能——消极赋权——的情况下赋权的可能性和危险。研究了抵制政府应对COVID-19的根源,以及培养其影响力的条件,然后提出了卫生素养学者和从业者的建议,以更好地应对未来危机中的传播挑战和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Services and Use
Information Services and Use Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Information Services & Use is an information and information technology oriented publication with a wide scope of subject matters. International in terms of both audience and authorship, the journal aims at leaders in information management and applications in an attempt to keep them fully informed of fast-moving developments in fields such as: online systems, offline systems, electronic publishing, library automation, education and training, word processing and telecommunications. These areas are treated not only in general, but also in specific contexts; applications to business and scientific fields are sought so that a balanced view is offered to the reader.
期刊最新文献
Unlocking potential: Harnessing the power of metadata for discoverability and accessibility Implementing and assessing Seamlessaccess: A publisher’s experience NISO’s content profile/linked document standard: A research communication format for today’s scholarly ecosystem Unanticipating metadata: Metadata in the ages of the internet and AI (Re?)Building trust in research integrity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1