Interval training during concurrent training optimizes cardiorespiratory adaptations in women

Rodrigo Ferrari, C. Alberton, S. Pinto, E. Cadore, R. Pinto, L. F. Kruel
{"title":"Interval training during concurrent training optimizes cardiorespiratory adaptations in women","authors":"Rodrigo Ferrari, C. Alberton, S. Pinto, E. Cadore, R. Pinto, L. F. Kruel","doi":"10.1590/1980-0037.2021V23E73867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study compared the effects of using continuous and interval aerobic exercise during concurrent training on cardiorespiratory adaptations in women. Thirty-two participants were randomly assigned into one of the following groups: continuous running and resistance training (C-RUN, n = 10), interval running and resistance training (I-RUN, n = 11), or control group that performed resistance training only (RT, n = 11). Each group trained twice a week during 11 weeks. Oxygen uptake corresponding to the first ventilatory threshold (VO2VT1), second ventilatory threshold (VO2VT2) and maximal effort (VO2max) was measured in a maximal incremental test performed before and after training. Significant increases in VO2VT1, VO2VT2 and VO2max were observed in all training groups. VO2VT2 and VO2max presented time-group interactions, indicating that the magnitude of the increase in these variables was dependent on the training group (VO2VT2: C-Run = 6.6%, I-Run = 15.7%, RT = 1.7%; VO2max: C-Run = 7.2%, I-Run = 14.3%, RT = 2.7%). The effect size observed for post-training values comparing C-RUN and RT groups was d = 0.566 for VO2VT2 and d = 0.442 for VO2max. On the other hand, values of d = 0.949 for VO2VT2 and d = 1.189 for VO2max were verified between I-RUN and RT groups. In conclusion, the use of continuous and interval aerobic exercise during concurrent training improved different cardiorespiratory parameters in women, but in a greater magnitude when interval aerobic exercise was performed simultaneously to resistance training.","PeriodicalId":38989,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano","volume":"148 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2021V23E73867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This study compared the effects of using continuous and interval aerobic exercise during concurrent training on cardiorespiratory adaptations in women. Thirty-two participants were randomly assigned into one of the following groups: continuous running and resistance training (C-RUN, n = 10), interval running and resistance training (I-RUN, n = 11), or control group that performed resistance training only (RT, n = 11). Each group trained twice a week during 11 weeks. Oxygen uptake corresponding to the first ventilatory threshold (VO2VT1), second ventilatory threshold (VO2VT2) and maximal effort (VO2max) was measured in a maximal incremental test performed before and after training. Significant increases in VO2VT1, VO2VT2 and VO2max were observed in all training groups. VO2VT2 and VO2max presented time-group interactions, indicating that the magnitude of the increase in these variables was dependent on the training group (VO2VT2: C-Run = 6.6%, I-Run = 15.7%, RT = 1.7%; VO2max: C-Run = 7.2%, I-Run = 14.3%, RT = 2.7%). The effect size observed for post-training values comparing C-RUN and RT groups was d = 0.566 for VO2VT2 and d = 0.442 for VO2max. On the other hand, values of d = 0.949 for VO2VT2 and d = 1.189 for VO2max were verified between I-RUN and RT groups. In conclusion, the use of continuous and interval aerobic exercise during concurrent training improved different cardiorespiratory parameters in women, but in a greater magnitude when interval aerobic exercise was performed simultaneously to resistance training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同时训练期间的间歇训练可优化女性的心肺适应性
摘要本研究比较了在同步训练中进行连续和间歇有氧运动对女性心肺适应性的影响。32名参与者被随机分配到以下一组:连续跑步和阻力训练(C-RUN, n = 10),间歇跑步和阻力训练(I-RUN, n = 11),或只进行阻力训练的对照组(RT, n = 11)。在11周的时间里,每组每周训练两次。在训练前后进行最大增量测试,测量与第一通气阈值(VO2VT1)、第二通气阈值(VO2VT2)和最大努力(VO2max)相对应的摄氧量。在所有训练组中,VO2VT1、VO2VT2和VO2max均显著增加。VO2VT2和VO2max呈现时间组交互作用,表明这些变量的增加幅度依赖于训练组(VO2VT2: C-Run = 6.6%, I-Run = 15.7%, RT = 1.7%;VO2max: C-Run = 7.2%, I-Run = 14.3%, RT = 2.7%)。对比C-RUN组和RT组,训练后VO2VT2值的效应量d = 0.566, VO2max值的效应量d = 0.442。另一方面,I-RUN组和RT组VO2VT2的d = 0.949, VO2max的d = 1.189。综上所述,在同步训练中使用连续和间歇有氧运动可改善女性的不同心肺参数,但间歇有氧运动与阻力训练同时进行时,改善幅度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance is a journal of Physical Education, Kinesiology, Sport and related areas, whose focus is human movement, being reviewed by an international panel of peers, with emphasis on the measurement of the man in its morphological and functional aspects, as well as conditioning factors of physical performance. Given the multidisciplinary nature of the journal, these areas of study are approached in several contexts, with interactions with social, behavioral, health and environmental aspects. The journal publishes original articles as well as relevant Review/Update articles and Points of View.
期刊最新文献
Talent identification and development in Olympic triathlon: a perspective from Brazilian coaches Factors associated with the practice of physical activity among university students in social isolation during the covid-19 pandemic Association of sex and training phase with physical activity and sedentary behavior in nursing students Influence of walking and running on patellofemoral pain The applicability of the Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) for predicting visceral fat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1