Individual and Situational Antecedents of Counterproductive Work Behaviors

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting BAR - Brazilian Administration Review Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-7692bar2020190126
L. Oliveira, Valter de Assis Moreno Junior, Rodrigo Gonçalves
{"title":"Individual and Situational Antecedents of Counterproductive Work Behaviors","authors":"L. Oliveira, Valter de Assis Moreno Junior, Rodrigo Gonçalves","doi":"10.1590/1807-7692bar2020190126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Counterproductive work behaviors (CWB) are harmful to organizations and detrimental to individual and collective performance. Although CWB have been considerably explored in the last decades, few studies have tried to assess the relative influence of their predictors. In this paper, we develop and test a structural equations model to evaluate the combined effects of two personality traits (agreeableness and neuroticism) and two situational variables (perceived organizational justice and leader-member exchange quality) on CWB. The analysis of data collected from 527 employees of a large Brazilian organization shows that agreeableness, neuroticism, and leader-member exchange quality (LMX) have direct effects on CWB and that LMX fully mediates the influence of organizational justice on the latter. Our findings extend previous models that looked into the Justice-LMX-CWB relationships and highlight the critical role played by leaders in preventing deleterious behaviors. We discuss their implications for research, as well as for human resource management (HRM) practice.","PeriodicalId":53636,"journal":{"name":"BAR - Brazilian Administration Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BAR - Brazilian Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2020190126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Counterproductive work behaviors (CWB) are harmful to organizations and detrimental to individual and collective performance. Although CWB have been considerably explored in the last decades, few studies have tried to assess the relative influence of their predictors. In this paper, we develop and test a structural equations model to evaluate the combined effects of two personality traits (agreeableness and neuroticism) and two situational variables (perceived organizational justice and leader-member exchange quality) on CWB. The analysis of data collected from 527 employees of a large Brazilian organization shows that agreeableness, neuroticism, and leader-member exchange quality (LMX) have direct effects on CWB and that LMX fully mediates the influence of organizational justice on the latter. Our findings extend previous models that looked into the Justice-LMX-CWB relationships and highlight the critical role played by leaders in preventing deleterious behaviors. We discuss their implications for research, as well as for human resource management (HRM) practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反生产工作行为的个体和情境前因
反生产行为(CWB)对组织有害,对个人和集体绩效有害。虽然在过去的几十年里对绕道进行了大量的探索,但很少有研究试图评估其预测因子的相对影响。本文建立了一个结构方程模型,以评估两种人格特征(随和型和神经质型)和两种情境变量(组织公平感和领导-成员交换质量)对员工绕道行为的综合影响。通过对巴西某大型组织527名员工的数据分析发现,亲和性、神经质和领导-成员交换质量(LMX)对领导-成员交换行为有直接影响,而LMX在组织公正对组织公平的影响中起中介作用。我们的研究结果扩展了先前研究Justice-LMX-CWB关系的模型,并强调了领导者在防止有害行为方面发挥的关键作用。我们将讨论它们对研究以及人力资源管理(HRM)实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Launched in 2004, BAR has an international scope in terms of topics of interest, target audience, and editorial boards. It is an A2-journal according to the Brazilian classification Qualis/Capes, which is thus a strong signal about the quality of published works and about the transparency of the editorial process. BAR follows the editorial principles available in document Best Practices of Scientific Publication, an initiative championed by the Brazilian Academy of Management (ANPAD) that seeks to assist journals to achieve high scholarly standards and enhance their impact as sources for theoretical and applied research. Furthermore, since 2013, BAR is a member of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics), what is another signal of efforts made towards adhering to the most rigorous ethical principles in academic publication.
期刊最新文献
The Future of the Professoriate Strategic Issues: A Systematic Review of the Literature Social Innovation, Experimentalism, and Public Governance: An Ethnographical Approach to Study Public Arenas in the City Competitiveness and R&D Subsidies: The Case of the Industry 4.0 Program in Portugal Inclusion and Diversity in Companies: Premises to Maximize Quality of Life and Profitability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1