A comparison between CNN and combined CNN-LSTM for chest X-ray based COVID-19 detection

IF 1.4 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Decision Science Letters Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5267/j.dsl.2023.2.004
Julio Fachrel, Anindya Apriliyanti Pravitasari, I. Yulita, Mulya Nurmansyah Ardhisasmita, F. Indrayatna
{"title":"A comparison between CNN and combined CNN-LSTM for chest X-ray based COVID-19 detection","authors":"Julio Fachrel, Anindya Apriliyanti Pravitasari, I. Yulita, Mulya Nurmansyah Ardhisasmita, F. Indrayatna","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2023.2.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 detection through radiological examination is favoured since it is fast and produces more accurate results than the laboratory approach. However, when it has infected many people and put a strain on the healthcare system, the need for fast, automatic COVID-19 detection in patients has become critical. This study proposes to detect COVID-19 from chest X-ray (CXR) images with a machine learning approach. The main contributions of this paper are to compare two powerful deep learning models, i.e., convolutional neural networks (CNN) and the combination of CNN and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). In the combination model, CNN is recommended for feature extraction, and COVID-19 is classified using the features of LSTM. The dataset used in this study amounted to 4,095 CXR images, consisting of 1,400 images of normal conditions, 1,350 images of COVID-19, and 1,345 images of pneumonia. Both CNN and CNN-LSTM were executed in a similar experimental setup and evaluated using a confusion matrix. The experiment results provide evidence that the CNN-LTSM is better than the CNN deep learning model, with an overall accuracy of about 98.78%. Furthermore, it has a precision and recall of 99% and 98%, respectively. These findings will be valuable in the fast and accurate detection of COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":38141,"journal":{"name":"Decision Science Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Science Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2023.2.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

COVID-19 detection through radiological examination is favoured since it is fast and produces more accurate results than the laboratory approach. However, when it has infected many people and put a strain on the healthcare system, the need for fast, automatic COVID-19 detection in patients has become critical. This study proposes to detect COVID-19 from chest X-ray (CXR) images with a machine learning approach. The main contributions of this paper are to compare two powerful deep learning models, i.e., convolutional neural networks (CNN) and the combination of CNN and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). In the combination model, CNN is recommended for feature extraction, and COVID-19 is classified using the features of LSTM. The dataset used in this study amounted to 4,095 CXR images, consisting of 1,400 images of normal conditions, 1,350 images of COVID-19, and 1,345 images of pneumonia. Both CNN and CNN-LSTM were executed in a similar experimental setup and evaluated using a confusion matrix. The experiment results provide evidence that the CNN-LTSM is better than the CNN deep learning model, with an overall accuracy of about 98.78%. Furthermore, it has a precision and recall of 99% and 98%, respectively. These findings will be valuable in the fast and accurate detection of COVID-19.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CNN与CNN- lstm联合胸片检测COVID-19的比较
通过放射检查检测COVID-19受到青睐,因为它比实验室方法快速且产生更准确的结果。然而,当它感染了许多人并给医疗系统带来压力时,在患者中快速、自动检测COVID-19的需求变得至关重要。本研究提出用机器学习方法从胸部x线(CXR)图像中检测COVID-19。本文的主要贡献是比较了两种强大的深度学习模型,即卷积神经网络(CNN)和CNN与长短期记忆(LSTM)的结合。在组合模型中,推荐使用CNN进行特征提取,使用LSTM的特征对COVID-19进行分类。本研究使用的数据集为4095张CXR图像,其中包括1400张正常图像,1350张COVID-19图像和1345张肺炎图像。CNN和CNN- lstm都在类似的实验设置中执行,并使用混淆矩阵进行评估。实验结果证明,CNN- ltsm优于CNN深度学习模型,总体准确率约为98.78%。此外,它的准确率和召回率分别为99%和98%。这些发现将有助于快速准确地检测COVID-19。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Decision Science Letters
Decision Science Letters Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Time series prediction of novel coronavirus COVID-19 data in west Java using Gaussian processes and least median squared linear regression Determinants of woodcraft family business success Analytical evaluation of big data applications in E-commerce: A mixed method approach A two-stage SEM-artificial neural network analysis of the organizational effects of Internet of things adoption in auditing firms A novel crossover operator for genetic algorithm: Stas crossover
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1