Effect of differently managed legumes on the early development of oil palms (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.)

P. Agamuthu , Y.K. Chan , R. Jesinger , K.M. Khoo , W.J. Broughton
{"title":"Effect of differently managed legumes on the early development of oil palms (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.)","authors":"P. Agamuthu ,&nbsp;Y.K. Chan ,&nbsp;R. Jesinger ,&nbsp;K.M. Khoo ,&nbsp;W.J. Broughton","doi":"10.1016/0304-3746(81)90036-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We studied the effects of different covers (none, legume and natural) established in different ways (with legumes only: hand-weeded, hand-weeded plus extra fertilizer, and with pre-emergent application of the herbicide Oxyfluorfen at 0.25 kg active ingredient ha<sup>−1</sup>), on the first 3.5 years' growth and yield of oil palms (<em>Elaeis guineensis</em> Jacq). Legumes were a mixture of <em>Centrosema pubescens</em> and <em>Pueraria phaseoloides</em>. Natural generation consisted mostly of <em>Nephrolepis biserrata</em> and <em>Paspalum conjugatum</em>. Early rates of growth of the palms (as measured by frond area, girth, height, etc.) were greatest in the bare plots and the first yields of fresh fruit bunches were significantly higher than with any other treatment. On the other hand, relative growth rates and net assimilation rates were higher in legume plots (particularly those established with Oxyfluorfen) throughout most of the experimental period. This means that the rate of growth of palms in legume treated plots steadily overtook the rate of growth of those in bare plots. Presumably, these differences resulted from rapid exploitation of soil nutrients by palms in bare plots, and the “banking” of these same nutrients in legume plots.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100066,"journal":{"name":"Agro-Ecosystems","volume":"6 4","pages":"Pages 315-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3746(81)90036-6","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agro-Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304374681900366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We studied the effects of different covers (none, legume and natural) established in different ways (with legumes only: hand-weeded, hand-weeded plus extra fertilizer, and with pre-emergent application of the herbicide Oxyfluorfen at 0.25 kg active ingredient ha−1), on the first 3.5 years' growth and yield of oil palms (Elaeis guineensis Jacq). Legumes were a mixture of Centrosema pubescens and Pueraria phaseoloides. Natural generation consisted mostly of Nephrolepis biserrata and Paspalum conjugatum. Early rates of growth of the palms (as measured by frond area, girth, height, etc.) were greatest in the bare plots and the first yields of fresh fruit bunches were significantly higher than with any other treatment. On the other hand, relative growth rates and net assimilation rates were higher in legume plots (particularly those established with Oxyfluorfen) throughout most of the experimental period. This means that the rate of growth of palms in legume treated plots steadily overtook the rate of growth of those in bare plots. Presumably, these differences resulted from rapid exploitation of soil nutrients by palms in bare plots, and the “banking” of these same nutrients in legume plots.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同管理豆科植物对油棕早期发育的影响
我们研究了以不同方式建立的不同覆盖(无覆盖、豆科覆盖和天然覆盖)(仅豆科覆盖:手工除草、手工除草加额外施肥,以及苗期前施用0.25 kg有效成分/公顷的除草剂氟氧芬)对油棕(Elaeis guineensis Jacq)前3.5年生长和产量的影响。豆科植物为毛蕊花和相葛根的混合物。自然代主要由双鼠肾和雀稗组成。棕榈的早期生长速度(以叶面积、周长、高度等测量)在光秃秃的地块上是最大的,新鲜果串的第一次产量显著高于任何其他处理。另一方面,在大部分试验期间,豆科植物的相对生长率和净同化率都较高(特别是用氟氧芬建立的豆科植物)。这意味着豆科作物处理地块的棕榈树生长速度稳定地超过了光秃秃地块的棕榈树生长速度。据推测,这些差异是由于棕榈树在光秃秃的土地上快速利用土壤养分,而在豆科植物的土地上“储存”这些养分造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Publisher's Note Subject index Author index Elsevier's dictionary of weeds of western Europe Energy and economics of intensive animal production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1