Species composition and community structure of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) compared among savanna and forest formations in the southwestern Brazilian Cerrado

IF 0.7 4区 生物学 Q4 ZOOLOGY Zoologia Pub Date : 2020-12-17 DOI:10.3897/zoologia.37.e58960
J. L. D. Silva, R. Silva, I. Fernandes, W. O. Sousa, F. Vaz-de-Mello
{"title":"Species composition and community structure of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) compared among savanna and forest formations in the southwestern Brazilian Cerrado","authors":"J. L. D. Silva, R. Silva, I. Fernandes, W. O. Sousa, F. Vaz-de-Mello","doi":"10.3897/zoologia.37.e58960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although dung beetles are important members of ecological communities and indicators of ecosystem quality, species diversity, and how it varies over space and habitat types, remains poorly understood in the Brazilian Cerrado. We compared dung beetle communities among plant formations in the Serra Azul State Park (SASP) in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Sampling (by baited pitfall and flight-interception traps) was carried out in 2012 in the Park in four habitat types: two different savanna formations (typical and open) and two forest formations (seasonally deciduous and gallery). A total of 5,400 individuals collected comprised 57 species in 22 genera. Typical savanna had the greatest species richness and abundance, followed by open savanna and deciduous forest, while the gallery forest had the fewest species but high abundance. Tunnelers (one of three main nesting behavior guilds) showed the greatest richness and abundance (except in the gallery forest, where one dweller species was extremely abundant) in all plant formations. We found that species richness and abundance of the dung beetle community are influenced by differences among plant formations. Habitat heterogeneity in the different plant formations along with anthropic influences (fire, habitat fragmentation) are cited as important factors that explain guild and species richness and distribution patterns. These results emphasize the importance of protected areas, such as SASP, for the maintenance and conservation of species diversity in the Brazilian Cerrado.","PeriodicalId":49335,"journal":{"name":"Zoologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoologia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.37.e58960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Although dung beetles are important members of ecological communities and indicators of ecosystem quality, species diversity, and how it varies over space and habitat types, remains poorly understood in the Brazilian Cerrado. We compared dung beetle communities among plant formations in the Serra Azul State Park (SASP) in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Sampling (by baited pitfall and flight-interception traps) was carried out in 2012 in the Park in four habitat types: two different savanna formations (typical and open) and two forest formations (seasonally deciduous and gallery). A total of 5,400 individuals collected comprised 57 species in 22 genera. Typical savanna had the greatest species richness and abundance, followed by open savanna and deciduous forest, while the gallery forest had the fewest species but high abundance. Tunnelers (one of three main nesting behavior guilds) showed the greatest richness and abundance (except in the gallery forest, where one dweller species was extremely abundant) in all plant formations. We found that species richness and abundance of the dung beetle community are influenced by differences among plant formations. Habitat heterogeneity in the different plant formations along with anthropic influences (fire, habitat fragmentation) are cited as important factors that explain guild and species richness and distribution patterns. These results emphasize the importance of protected areas, such as SASP, for the maintenance and conservation of species diversity in the Brazilian Cerrado.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西塞拉多西南部稀树草原与森林地层中屎壳郎(鞘翅目:金龟甲科:金龟甲科)的种类组成与群落结构比较
尽管屎壳郎是生态群落的重要成员和生态系统质量的指标,但在巴西塞拉多地区,人们对屎壳郎的物种多样性及其在空间和栖息地类型上的变化知之甚少。我们比较了巴西马托格罗索州Serra Azul州立公园(SASP)植物地层中的蜣螂群落。2012年在该公园进行了四种生境类型的采样(采用诱捕陷阱和飞行拦截陷阱):两种不同的稀树草原类型(典型和开放)和两种森林类型(季节性落叶和廊道)。共采集到22属57种5400个个体。典型热带稀树草原的物种丰富度和丰度最高,其次是开阔热带稀树草原和落叶森林,廊道林的物种最少,但丰度较高。隧道蚁(三种主要筑巢行为行会之一)在所有植物形态中表现出最大的丰富度和丰度(除了走廊林,其中一种栖息物种非常丰富)。研究发现,不同植物形态对屎壳虫群落的物种丰富度和丰度有一定的影响。不同植物形态的生境异质性以及人为影响(火灾、生境破碎化)被认为是解释物种丰富度和分布格局的重要因素。这些结果强调了保护区(如SASP)对维持和保护巴西塞拉多地区物种多样性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zoologia
Zoologia 生物-动物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Zoologia, the scientific journal of the Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia (SBZ), is an international peer-reviewed, open-access Zoological journal that publishes original research on systematics, evolution, taxonomy, nomenclature, biogeography, morphology, physiology, biology, ecology, symbiosis, conservation, behavior, genetics and allied fields. The journal, formerly known as Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, publishes original articles authored by both members and non-members of the Society. The manuscripts should be written exclusively in English.
期刊最新文献
Optimal foraging of Neotropical otters (Carnivora: Mustelidae) in an urban river and predominance of generalist and sedentary fish in their diet Migratory fishes from rivers to reservoirs: seasonal and longitudinal perspectives Morphological and molecular evidence of the occurrence of Artibeus amplus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) in Brazil Taxonomic re-evaluation of New World Eptesicus and Histiotus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae), with the description of a new genus Cave-dwelling gastropods (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of Brazil, state of the art and conservation: a critical review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1