Selecting and balancing market portfolio using artificial intelligence and fuzzy multiobjective decision-making model

Wen-Lung Shih, Chiu-Chi Wei, Hsien-Hong Lin, Pin-Hsiang Chang
{"title":"Selecting and balancing market portfolio using artificial intelligence and fuzzy multiobjective decision-making model","authors":"Wen-Lung Shih, Chiu-Chi Wei, Hsien-Hong Lin, Pin-Hsiang Chang","doi":"10.1177/1063293X221115768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most enterprises focus on product portfolio management (PPM) and exclude market portfolio management, and individual markets are selected solely based on financial performance which may not be appropriate because other factors may dictate the outcome of the market selection. This study proposes a market portfolio model that considers market share, market growth, market competition, market risk, and market cost to maximize overall profit. A three-stage approach is proposed to identify potential product markets using an AI algorithm. A set of the most promising market is then determined based on the results of Stage 1 using a fuzzy multi-objective mathematical programming model by concurrently maximizing the total market share and market growth, and minimizing the market competition and market risk. A single-objective mathematical programming model is then used to determine a market portfolio to maximize the total profit using the results for Stage 2. The single-objective model is tested using two sets of threshold constraints. The balance of the market portfolio is discussed and the results are compared. The novelty of the article: (1) the first study involves a product market portfolio, (2) the decision of market selection is scientific (using AI instead of personal judgment), holistic (factors include market share, growth, competition, risk, cost, and profit) and optimized (using mathematical optimization), and (3) the market portfolio maximizes total profit. (4) the proposed method produces a portfolio with a higher profit than the TOPSIS method.","PeriodicalId":10680,"journal":{"name":"Concurrent Engineering","volume":"72 1","pages":"382 - 398"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concurrent Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X221115768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most enterprises focus on product portfolio management (PPM) and exclude market portfolio management, and individual markets are selected solely based on financial performance which may not be appropriate because other factors may dictate the outcome of the market selection. This study proposes a market portfolio model that considers market share, market growth, market competition, market risk, and market cost to maximize overall profit. A three-stage approach is proposed to identify potential product markets using an AI algorithm. A set of the most promising market is then determined based on the results of Stage 1 using a fuzzy multi-objective mathematical programming model by concurrently maximizing the total market share and market growth, and minimizing the market competition and market risk. A single-objective mathematical programming model is then used to determine a market portfolio to maximize the total profit using the results for Stage 2. The single-objective model is tested using two sets of threshold constraints. The balance of the market portfolio is discussed and the results are compared. The novelty of the article: (1) the first study involves a product market portfolio, (2) the decision of market selection is scientific (using AI instead of personal judgment), holistic (factors include market share, growth, competition, risk, cost, and profit) and optimized (using mathematical optimization), and (3) the market portfolio maximizes total profit. (4) the proposed method produces a portfolio with a higher profit than the TOPSIS method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人工智能和模糊多目标决策模型的市场组合选择与平衡
大多数企业关注的是产品组合管理(PPM),而忽略了市场组合管理,单个市场的选择仅仅基于财务绩效,这可能是不合适的,因为其他因素可能决定市场选择的结果。本文提出了一个考虑市场份额、市场增长、市场竞争、市场风险和市场成本的市场投资组合模型,以实现整体利润最大化。提出了一种使用人工智能算法识别潜在产品市场的三阶段方法。然后,根据第一阶段的结果,利用模糊多目标数学规划模型,通过同时最大化市场总份额和市场增长,最小化市场竞争和市场风险,确定一组最有前景的市场。然后使用单目标数学规划模型来确定市场投资组合,以利用阶段2的结果最大化总利润。使用两组阈值约束对单目标模型进行了测试。讨论了市场投资组合的均衡问题,并对结果进行了比较。本文的新颖性:(1)第一个研究涉及产品市场组合,(2)市场选择决策是科学的(使用人工智能代替个人判断),整体的(因素包括市场份额,增长,竞争,风险,成本和利润)和优化的(使用数学优化),(3)市场组合使总利润最大化。(4)所得的投资组合收益高于TOPSIS方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity study of process parameters of wire arc additive manufacturing using probabilistic deep learning and uncertainty quantification Retraction Notice Decision-making solutions based artificial intelligence and hybrid software for optimal sizing and energy management in a smart grid system Harness collaboration between manufacturing Small and medium-sized enterprises through a collaborative platform based on the business model canvas Research on the evolution law of cloud manufacturing service ecosystem based on multi-agent behavior simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1