A complex systems view of climate and development issues in South African coal power expansion

IF 0.6 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of Energy in Southern Africa Pub Date : 2021-02-18 DOI:10.17159/2413-3051/2021/V32I1A9052
E. Tyler, B. Cohen
{"title":"A complex systems view of climate and development issues in South African coal power expansion","authors":"E. Tyler, B. Cohen","doi":"10.17159/2413-3051/2021/V32I1A9052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of climate change policy in South Africa inevitably requires decision-makers to navigate issues of development. This paper explores some of the implications of this requirement by examining the case of a proposed new independent coal-fired power producing plant, Khanyisa, in the province of Mpumalanga from the perspective of complexity studies, an emerging transdisciplinary field. Complexity thinking re-casts the Khanyisa project in a whole-system view, encouraging an active consideration of scale, perspectives, different knowledges, and cumulative impacts. In so doing, tensions both between and within dimensions of climate mitigation and development are quickly revealed, a complexity which is theorised in complexity studies as the raw material for systemic transformation. This wholesystem conceptualisation also undermines incremental and relative arguments that Khanyisa mitigates greenhouse gas emissions. Further, the complex systemic property of non-linearity suggests that the Khanyisa decision is more significant than its power generation capacity indicates. Attention to the conceptual simplification inherent in ‘development’ highlights what is lost through such simplification, as well as what is gained, and by whom. Finally, complexity thinking foregrounds the multiple scales at which the systemic climate mitigation and development implications of Khanyisa play out. Currently there is very little policy-making capacity nationally, regionally or in eMalahleni to look at alternatives, or ‘spaces of possibility’ through the complexity lens for both development and climate mitigation. This case argues that new policy processes are needed, which go far beyond policy and regulatory processes steeped in path dependencies and incrementalism.","PeriodicalId":15666,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy in Southern Africa","volume":"20 1","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2021/V32I1A9052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The implementation of climate change policy in South Africa inevitably requires decision-makers to navigate issues of development. This paper explores some of the implications of this requirement by examining the case of a proposed new independent coal-fired power producing plant, Khanyisa, in the province of Mpumalanga from the perspective of complexity studies, an emerging transdisciplinary field. Complexity thinking re-casts the Khanyisa project in a whole-system view, encouraging an active consideration of scale, perspectives, different knowledges, and cumulative impacts. In so doing, tensions both between and within dimensions of climate mitigation and development are quickly revealed, a complexity which is theorised in complexity studies as the raw material for systemic transformation. This wholesystem conceptualisation also undermines incremental and relative arguments that Khanyisa mitigates greenhouse gas emissions. Further, the complex systemic property of non-linearity suggests that the Khanyisa decision is more significant than its power generation capacity indicates. Attention to the conceptual simplification inherent in ‘development’ highlights what is lost through such simplification, as well as what is gained, and by whom. Finally, complexity thinking foregrounds the multiple scales at which the systemic climate mitigation and development implications of Khanyisa play out. Currently there is very little policy-making capacity nationally, regionally or in eMalahleni to look at alternatives, or ‘spaces of possibility’ through the complexity lens for both development and climate mitigation. This case argues that new policy processes are needed, which go far beyond policy and regulatory processes steeped in path dependencies and incrementalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非煤电扩张中气候与发展问题的复杂系统观点
在南非实施气候变化政策不可避免地要求决策者驾驭发展问题。本文从复杂性研究(一个新兴的跨学科领域)的角度,通过研究拟建的位于姆普马兰加省的新独立燃煤发电厂kanyisa的案例,探讨了这一要求的一些含义。复杂性思维从整体系统的角度重新审视了汉尼萨项目,鼓励对规模、视角、不同知识和累积影响的积极考虑。在这样做的过程中,气候减缓和发展的两个维度之间和内部的紧张关系很快就被揭示出来,这种复杂性在复杂性研究中被理论化,作为系统性转型的原材料。这种整体系统概念化也削弱了kanyisa减轻温室气体排放的增量和相对论点。此外,非线性的复杂系统特性表明,kanyisa决策比其发电能力所表明的更为重要。对“发展”固有的概念简化的关注强调了通过这种简化失去了什么,以及获得了什么,以及由谁获得。最后,复杂性思维展望了汉尼萨的系统性气候减缓和发展影响发挥作用的多重尺度。目前,国家、区域或马拉莱尼几乎没有制定政策的能力,无法从发展和减缓气候变化的复杂性角度来看待替代方案或“可能性空间”。本案例认为,需要新的政策流程,这些流程远远超出了沉浸在路径依赖和渐进主义中的政策和监管流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal has a regional focus on southern Africa. Manuscripts that are accepted for consideration to publish in the journal must address energy issues in southern Africa or have a clear component relevant to southern Africa, including research that was set-up or designed in the region. The southern African region is considered to be constituted by the following fifteen (15) countries: Angola, Botswana, Democratic Republic of Congo, Lesotho, Malawi, Madagascar, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Seychelles, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Within this broad field of energy research, topics of particular interest include energy efficiency, modelling, renewable energy, poverty, sustainable development, climate change mitigation, energy security, energy policy, energy governance, markets, technology and innovation.
期刊最新文献
Modelling NO2 emissions from Eskom’s coal fired power stations using Generalised Linear Models Trend analysis and inter-annual variability in wind speed in South Africa Commercialization of green hydrogen production from kraal manure in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: A review Investigation of Wind Data Resolution for Small Wind Turbine Performance Study Socio-economic analysis of solar photovoltaic-based mini-grids in rural communities: A Ugandan case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1