Patterns in the development of collective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic

A. Popova, V. S. Smirnov, S. Egorova, I. Drozd, A. M. Milichkina, A. M. Dashkevich, Z. Nurmatov, G. Melik-Andreasyan, M. Ruziev, A. Totolian
{"title":"Patterns in the development of collective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"A. Popova, V. S. Smirnov, S. Egorova, I. Drozd, A. M. Milichkina, A. M. Dashkevich, Z. Nurmatov, G. Melik-Andreasyan, M. Ruziev, A. Totolian","doi":"10.15789/1563-0625-pit-2867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ongoing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic over the past three years has caused close attention to the problem of herd immunity, which is understood as: \"resistance to the spread of a contagious disease within a population or herd\". Collective immunity is formed both as a result of infection (natural spread of the pathogen in a population of susceptible individuals) and as a result of the use of specific vaccines. During the COVID-19 pandemic, both mechanisms for the formation of collective immunity were realized. In the first wave, there was a natural formation of collective immunity to the virus following recoveries from COVID-19 caused by pandemic spread of SARS-CoV-2. Starting from December 2020, the widespread use of specific vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 began in the USA, Great Britain, China, Russia, and a number of other countries. This launched the process of post-vaccination collective immunity formation; its features have depended on the vaccine types implemented. Currently, in those countries where vaccination and revaccination of recovered patients is widely carried out, immunity is \"hybrid\" in nature. Several commonalities should be noted in the pandemic experience: a somewhat regular, periodic (wavelike) nature of the COVID-19 epidemic process; changes in pathogen genetics in variants in all countries; and expansive mass vaccination programs in many populations. From these, we can draw some conclusions about the general trend for all countries in the formation of collective immunity during the pandemic: At the beginning of the pandemic in 2020, overall population seroprevalence did not exceed 20%. Other findings were: the highest seroprevalence rates were noted in the children's age group; pronounced regional differences were revealed; and the highest indicators were noted among medical workers. Collective immunity developed as a result of infection or illness, and in the majority of seropositive volunteers, it was represented by antibodies to both antigens. At the height of the pandemic in the summer of 2021, population seroprevalence reached 50%. This was due to both a significant number of convalescents and the start of mass vaccination campaigns. In all countries, specific differences in seroprevalence (by age, region, profession) leveled out, leading to more uniformity. During this period, the formation of \"hybrid\" immunity is clearly prominent, and the proportion of individuals with antibodies to RBD alone increased (due to vaccination with vector vaccines).  Later, mass vaccination, as well as involvement of most of the population in the epidemic process due to the emergence of the highly contagious Omicron strain, raised the level of collective immunity to 80-90%. This led to a sharp decrease in COVID-19 incidence in the second half of 2022 in all countries participating in the study. In the later stages of the pandemic (2022-2023), almost 90% of seropositive volunteers had hybrid immunity, reflected as antibodies to both antigens (Nc, RBD).","PeriodicalId":37835,"journal":{"name":"Medical Immunology (Russia)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Immunology (Russia)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-pit-2867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ongoing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic over the past three years has caused close attention to the problem of herd immunity, which is understood as: "resistance to the spread of a contagious disease within a population or herd". Collective immunity is formed both as a result of infection (natural spread of the pathogen in a population of susceptible individuals) and as a result of the use of specific vaccines. During the COVID-19 pandemic, both mechanisms for the formation of collective immunity were realized. In the first wave, there was a natural formation of collective immunity to the virus following recoveries from COVID-19 caused by pandemic spread of SARS-CoV-2. Starting from December 2020, the widespread use of specific vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 began in the USA, Great Britain, China, Russia, and a number of other countries. This launched the process of post-vaccination collective immunity formation; its features have depended on the vaccine types implemented. Currently, in those countries where vaccination and revaccination of recovered patients is widely carried out, immunity is "hybrid" in nature. Several commonalities should be noted in the pandemic experience: a somewhat regular, periodic (wavelike) nature of the COVID-19 epidemic process; changes in pathogen genetics in variants in all countries; and expansive mass vaccination programs in many populations. From these, we can draw some conclusions about the general trend for all countries in the formation of collective immunity during the pandemic: At the beginning of the pandemic in 2020, overall population seroprevalence did not exceed 20%. Other findings were: the highest seroprevalence rates were noted in the children's age group; pronounced regional differences were revealed; and the highest indicators were noted among medical workers. Collective immunity developed as a result of infection or illness, and in the majority of seropositive volunteers, it was represented by antibodies to both antigens. At the height of the pandemic in the summer of 2021, population seroprevalence reached 50%. This was due to both a significant number of convalescents and the start of mass vaccination campaigns. In all countries, specific differences in seroprevalence (by age, region, profession) leveled out, leading to more uniformity. During this period, the formation of "hybrid" immunity is clearly prominent, and the proportion of individuals with antibodies to RBD alone increased (due to vaccination with vector vaccines).  Later, mass vaccination, as well as involvement of most of the population in the epidemic process due to the emergence of the highly contagious Omicron strain, raised the level of collective immunity to 80-90%. This led to a sharp decrease in COVID-19 incidence in the second half of 2022 in all countries participating in the study. In the later stages of the pandemic (2022-2023), almost 90% of seropositive volunteers had hybrid immunity, reflected as antibodies to both antigens (Nc, RBD).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间SARS-CoV-2集体免疫发展模式
过去三年持续的冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行引起了人们对群体免疫问题的密切关注,群体免疫被理解为:“抵抗传染病在人群或群体中传播”。集体免疫是由于感染(病原体在易感人群中自然传播)和使用特定疫苗而形成的。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,这两种形成集体免疫的机制都实现了。在第一波浪潮中,由于SARS-CoV-2的大流行传播,人们从COVID-19中恢复过来,自然形成了对病毒的集体免疫力。从2020年12月开始,美国、英国、中国、俄罗斯和其他一些国家开始广泛使用针对SARS-CoV-2的特异性疫苗。这启动了疫苗接种后集体免疫形成的进程;它的特点取决于所使用的疫苗类型。目前,在那些广泛开展康复患者疫苗接种和再接种的国家,免疫是“混合型”的。在大流行经验中应该注意到几个共同点:COVID-19流行过程具有一定的规律性、周期性(波浪式);所有国家变异病原体遗传学的变化;以及在许多人群中扩大大规模疫苗接种计划。由此,我们可以得出关于大流行期间所有国家形成集体免疫的总体趋势的一些结论:在2020年大流行开始时,总体人群血清阳性率未超过20%。其他发现包括:儿童年龄组的血清患病率最高;明显的地区差异显露出来;医疗工作者的指标最高。集体免疫是由于感染或疾病而产生的,在大多数血清呈阳性的志愿者中,集体免疫表现为对这两种抗原的抗体。在2021年夏季大流行高峰期,人口血清阳性率达到50%。这是由于大量康复者和大规模疫苗接种运动的开始。在所有国家,血清患病率的具体差异(按年龄、地区、职业划分)趋于平稳,从而更加统一。在此期间,“混合”免疫的形成明显突出,单独具有RBD抗体的个体比例增加(由于接种了载体疫苗)。后来,大规模接种疫苗,以及由于高传染性欧米克隆菌株的出现而使大多数人口参与流行过程,将集体免疫水平提高到80-90%。这导致所有参与研究的国家在2022年下半年的COVID-19发病率急剧下降。在大流行的后期阶段(2022-2023年),几乎90%的血清阳性志愿者具有混合免疫,反映为对两种抗原(Nc, RBD)的抗体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Immunology (Russia)
Medical Immunology (Russia) Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal mission is to promote scientific achievements in fundamental and applied immunology to various medical fields, the publication of reviews, lectures, essays by leading domestic and foreign experts in the field of fundamental and experimental immunology, clinical immunology, allergology, immunodiagnostics and immunotherapy of infectious, allergy, autoimmune diseases and cancer.
期刊最新文献
Experience of using immunomodulatory therapy in the complex treatment of mild community-acquired pneumonia and its long-term results Hypersegmentation of neutrophil nuclei in peripheral blood of patients with localized and advanced cancer of the larynx and laryngopharynx Functional and metabolic activity of blood neutrophilic granulocytes in children with erosive and ulcerative lesions of the stomach and duodenum with detected Helicobacter pylori infection Galectin-9 influences the Tim-3 molecule expression in natural killer different subpopulations Chronobiological approach to study the physiological activity of Candida species
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1