The degree show may not be your best show

Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Visual Art Practice Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/14702029.2020.1724664
C. Rowe
{"title":"The degree show may not be your best show","authors":"C. Rowe","doi":"10.1080/14702029.2020.1724664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Building upon a presentation given at the 2019 Paradox European Fine Art forum biennial conference in Riga, this paper investigates the efficacy of the ‘degree show’, a fixture that is common to nearly all university and academy courses of fine art. The paper presents a critical analysis of curriculum design and content in the run-up to the degree show, taking the BA (Hons) Fine Art course at Norwich University of the Arts (where the author works) as a case study. The paper questions if the traditional degree show is still fit for purpose and if not, how might it be made so. The paper draws our attention to some of the militating presence that skews the freedom of the degree show, primarily the issues arising out of accommodating performance, process and transience into an event governed by assessment, conventional expectations of the viewing public and institutional marketing. In response to applying the theories of experiential and situational learning, conclusions from this paper propose models of exposition (a critique of the degree show) that support the fine art student as a learner adequately equipped to undertake creative practice, employment or further study within a fast-changing geopolitical landscape.","PeriodicalId":35077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Art Practice","volume":"8 2 1","pages":"53 - 68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Art Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2020.1724664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Building upon a presentation given at the 2019 Paradox European Fine Art forum biennial conference in Riga, this paper investigates the efficacy of the ‘degree show’, a fixture that is common to nearly all university and academy courses of fine art. The paper presents a critical analysis of curriculum design and content in the run-up to the degree show, taking the BA (Hons) Fine Art course at Norwich University of the Arts (where the author works) as a case study. The paper questions if the traditional degree show is still fit for purpose and if not, how might it be made so. The paper draws our attention to some of the militating presence that skews the freedom of the degree show, primarily the issues arising out of accommodating performance, process and transience into an event governed by assessment, conventional expectations of the viewing public and institutional marketing. In response to applying the theories of experiential and situational learning, conclusions from this paper propose models of exposition (a critique of the degree show) that support the fine art student as a learner adequately equipped to undertake creative practice, employment or further study within a fast-changing geopolitical landscape.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学位秀可能不是你最好的秀
基于在里加举行的2019年悖论欧洲美术论坛两年一次会议上的演讲,本文调查了“学位展”的有效性,这是几乎所有大学和学院美术课程中常见的一种固定装置。本文以诺威奇艺术大学(作者工作的地方)的文学士(荣誉)美术课程为例,对学位展准备阶段的课程设计和内容进行了批判性分析。论文质疑传统的学位秀是否仍然适用,如果不适用,如何使其适用。本文将我们的注意力吸引到一些影响学位展示自由的存在,主要是由于适应表演、过程和短暂性而产生的问题,这些问题由评估、观看公众的传统期望和机构营销所控制。为了回应经验和情境学习理论的应用,本文的结论提出了阐述模型(对学位展示的批评),这些模型支持美术学生作为学习者,在快速变化的地缘政治环境中充分准备进行创造性实践,就业或进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Visual Art Practice
Journal of Visual Art Practice Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Journal of Visual Art Practice (JVAP) is a forum of debate and inquiry for research in art. JVAP is concerned with visual art practice including the social, economic, political and cultural frames within which the formal concerns of art and visual art practice are located. The journal is concerned with research engaged in these disciplines, and with the contested ideas of knowledge formed through that research. JVAP welcomes submissions that explore new theories of research and practice and work on the practical and educational impact of visual arts research. JVAP recognises the diversity of research in art and visual arts, and as such, we encourage contributions from scholarly and pure research, as well as developmental, applied and pedagogical research. In addition to established scholars, we welcome and are supportive of submissions from new contributors including doctoral researchers. We seek contributions engaged with, but not limited to, these themes: -Art, visual art and research into practitioners'' methods and methodologies -Art , visual art, big data, technology, and social change -Art, visual art, and urban planning -Art, visual art, ethics and the public sphere -Art, visual art, representations and translation -Art, visual art, and philosophy -Art, visual art, methods, histories and beliefs -Art, visual art, neuroscience and the social brain -Art, visual art, and economics -Art, visual art, politics and power -Art, visual art, vision and visuality -Art, visual art, and social practice -Art, visual art, and the methodology of arts based research
期刊最新文献
Expansion painting: a visual essay For whom do site-specific art structures provide territorial services? The case of European peripheral areas ‘Lay of the land’: a descriptive look at art practice dissertations 2018–2021 ‘Lay of the land’: a descriptive look at art practice dissertations 2018–2021 History, heritage, and the site-specific in contemporary Iranian art
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1