Composizione-univerbazione? Le oscillazioni di grafia nei produttivi composti italiani a schema (N) VN sul materiale linguistico tratto da La Gazzetta dello Sport negli anni 2016—2020

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Neo-Victorian Studies Pub Date : 2020-12-23 DOI:10.31261/neo.2020.32.17
Anna Godzich
{"title":"Composizione-univerbazione? Le oscillazioni di grafia nei produttivi composti italiani a schema (N) VN sul materiale linguistico tratto da La Gazzetta dello Sport negli anni 2016—2020","authors":"Anna Godzich","doi":"10.31261/neo.2020.32.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Word-formation and compounding in Italian present many interesting challenges (classification of compounds, its interpretation and types of semantic relationship that may hold between the compound’s elements). This article attempts to examine a different one — the orthography of one productive compounding pattern in present-day Italian, that is Verb + Noun compounds. Various accounts of Verb + Noun ortography are reviewed, with special focus on the status of hyphenated words. In light of this data, the author focuces also on the problem of inclusion of compounds as multi-word units by dictionaries. The aim of this research is to contrast theoretical prescriptions with some data samples of Italian (Noun) Verb + Noun compounds drawn from La Gazzetta dello Sport (2016—2020). With this analysis the author wants to examine more in detail whether the use reflects what Italian grammarians claim about the Verb + Noun compounds ortography rules, because in various researches conducted in this field that aspect has often been neglected.","PeriodicalId":41498,"journal":{"name":"Neo-Victorian Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neo-Victorian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31261/neo.2020.32.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Word-formation and compounding in Italian present many interesting challenges (classification of compounds, its interpretation and types of semantic relationship that may hold between the compound’s elements). This article attempts to examine a different one — the orthography of one productive compounding pattern in present-day Italian, that is Verb + Noun compounds. Various accounts of Verb + Noun ortography are reviewed, with special focus on the status of hyphenated words. In light of this data, the author focuces also on the problem of inclusion of compounds as multi-word units by dictionaries. The aim of this research is to contrast theoretical prescriptions with some data samples of Italian (Noun) Verb + Noun compounds drawn from La Gazzetta dello Sport (2016—2020). With this analysis the author wants to examine more in detail whether the use reflects what Italian grammarians claim about the Verb + Noun compounds ortography rules, because in various researches conducted in this field that aspect has often been neglected.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Composizione-univerbazione ?2016年至2020年,《体育公报》(Sport journal)的意大利模式(N) VN复合材料的写作波动
意大利语中的构词法和复合法提出了许多有趣的挑战(复合词的分类、解释和复合词元素之间可能存在的语义关系类型)。这篇文章试图检查一个不同的-一种生产复合模式的正字法在现代意大利语,即动词+名词复合词。回顾了动词+名词词法的各种说法,特别关注了连字符词的地位。根据这些数据,作者还重点研究了词典将复合词作为多词单位的收录问题。本研究的目的是将理论处方与来自《米兰体育报》(2016-2020)的意大利语(名词)动词+名词复合词的一些数据样本进行对比。通过这一分析,作者想更详细地研究这种用法是否反映了意大利语法学家对动词+名词复合词法规则的主张,因为在这一领域进行的各种研究中,这方面经常被忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neo-Victorian Studies
Neo-Victorian Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clichés and pragmatemes Ça roule ! — un pragmatème à décortiquer. Une étude contrastive franco-italienne Classement de métonymies et traduction automatique Le choix des structures syntaxiques peut-il avoir un effet manipulatoire sur l’auditoire ? Est-il possible de se mettre d’accord sur le sens à donner au terme de pragmatème ?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1