María Cuadra, Nagore Ceberio, María Rodríguez, José Luis Mendizabal, Javier Gorostiaga, Iñaki Lete
{"title":"Tratamiento quirúrgico del cáncer de endometrio: ¿qué pasaría si no realizamos biopsia intraoperatoria?","authors":"María Cuadra, Nagore Ceberio, María Rodríguez, José Luis Mendizabal, Javier Gorostiaga, Iñaki Lete","doi":"10.1016/j.pog.2015.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To analyse differences between preoperative and postoperative staging in a series of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery in our department.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective study of malignant endometrial tumours treated by laparoscopic surgery between January 1<sup>st</sup> 2005 and August 31<sup>st</sup> 2014. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy performed before the intervention. We estimated the percentage of women at risk of over- and under-treatment if intraoperative biopsy had not been performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 174 malignant endometrial tumours. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging was 95.09, 63.33, 93.37 and 70.37%, respectively. For preoperative biopsy, the results were sensitivity (90.91%), specificity (65.38%), positive predictive value (74.77%) and negative predictive value. (86.44%). If intraoperative biopsy had not been performed, 12 of 166 (12.65%) women in stage 1 would have been undertreated and 3.61% would have been overtreated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Intraoperative biopsy should be mandatory in the early the stages of endometrial cancer to avoid under- and over-treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35677,"journal":{"name":"Progresos en Obstetricia y Ginecologia","volume":"58 10","pages":"Pages 446-451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pog.2015.05.007","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progresos en Obstetricia y Ginecologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304501315001557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Objectives
To analyse differences between preoperative and postoperative staging in a series of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery in our department.
Material and methods
We conducted a retrospective study of malignant endometrial tumours treated by laparoscopic surgery between January 1st 2005 and August 31st 2014. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy performed before the intervention. We estimated the percentage of women at risk of over- and under-treatment if intraoperative biopsy had not been performed.
Results
We included 174 malignant endometrial tumours. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging was 95.09, 63.33, 93.37 and 70.37%, respectively. For preoperative biopsy, the results were sensitivity (90.91%), specificity (65.38%), positive predictive value (74.77%) and negative predictive value. (86.44%). If intraoperative biopsy had not been performed, 12 of 166 (12.65%) women in stage 1 would have been undertreated and 3.61% would have been overtreated.
Conclusion
Intraoperative biopsy should be mandatory in the early the stages of endometrial cancer to avoid under- and over-treatment.
期刊介绍:
Es la Revista Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia, y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina. Sus contenidos, clasificados en función de 4 grandes áreas (reproducción y endocrinología, perinatología, oncología y ginecología general) resultan de máxima utilidad para el especialista.