Reliability and Feasibility of the Self-Administered ISTH-Bleeding Assessment Tool

M. Punt, M. Blaauwgeers, M. Timmer, P. Welsing, R. Schutgens, K. V. van Galen
{"title":"Reliability and Feasibility of the Self-Administered ISTH-Bleeding Assessment Tool","authors":"M. Punt, M. Blaauwgeers, M. Timmer, P. Welsing, R. Schutgens, K. V. van Galen","doi":"10.1055/s-0039-3400483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Standardized bleeding assessment tools (BATs), such as the International Society for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH)-BAT, are screening instruments used during the diagnostic workup of suspected bleeding disorders. A self-administered ISTH-BAT (self-BAT) would enhance screening and save time during an outpatient clinic visit. Aim This study was aimed to investigate the reliability and feasibility of the self-BAT. Methods The electronic self-BAT was created from the ISTH-BAT and paper-version of self-BAT and optimized by patients and physicians. Patients with a (suspected) congenital platelet defect (CPD), who had previously undergone physician-administered ISTH-BAT assessment, were invited to complete the self-BAT. Optimal self-BAT cut-off values to detect a bleeding tendency, as defined by the ISTH-BAT, were evaluated by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to reach a sensitivity ≥95%. Reliability was tested by assessing sensitivity, specificity, and intraclass correlation (ICC). Feasibility was evaluated on comprehension and length of self-BAT. Results Both versions of the BAT were completed by 156 patients. Optimal cut-off values for self-BAT to define a bleeding tendency were found to be identical to those of the ISTH-BAT. Normal/abnormal scores of the ISTH-BAT and self-BAT were agreed in 88.5% (138/156, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83–0.93) of patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the self-BAT to detect a bleeding tendency were 96.9 and 48.1%, respectively. The ICC was 0.73. Self-BAT questions were graded by 96.8% (151/156) as “very easy,” “easy,” and “satisfactory” and questionnaire length as “exactly right” by 91% (142/156) of patients. Conclusion In patients with a (suspected) CPD, the self-BAT is sufficiently reliable and feasible to detect a bleeding tendency, which supports its use as a screening tool.","PeriodicalId":94220,"journal":{"name":"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis","volume":"40 1","pages":"e350 - e355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3400483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Standardized bleeding assessment tools (BATs), such as the International Society for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH)-BAT, are screening instruments used during the diagnostic workup of suspected bleeding disorders. A self-administered ISTH-BAT (self-BAT) would enhance screening and save time during an outpatient clinic visit. Aim This study was aimed to investigate the reliability and feasibility of the self-BAT. Methods The electronic self-BAT was created from the ISTH-BAT and paper-version of self-BAT and optimized by patients and physicians. Patients with a (suspected) congenital platelet defect (CPD), who had previously undergone physician-administered ISTH-BAT assessment, were invited to complete the self-BAT. Optimal self-BAT cut-off values to detect a bleeding tendency, as defined by the ISTH-BAT, were evaluated by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to reach a sensitivity ≥95%. Reliability was tested by assessing sensitivity, specificity, and intraclass correlation (ICC). Feasibility was evaluated on comprehension and length of self-BAT. Results Both versions of the BAT were completed by 156 patients. Optimal cut-off values for self-BAT to define a bleeding tendency were found to be identical to those of the ISTH-BAT. Normal/abnormal scores of the ISTH-BAT and self-BAT were agreed in 88.5% (138/156, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83–0.93) of patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the self-BAT to detect a bleeding tendency were 96.9 and 48.1%, respectively. The ICC was 0.73. Self-BAT questions were graded by 96.8% (151/156) as “very easy,” “easy,” and “satisfactory” and questionnaire length as “exactly right” by 91% (142/156) of patients. Conclusion In patients with a (suspected) CPD, the self-BAT is sufficiently reliable and feasible to detect a bleeding tendency, which supports its use as a screening tool.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自行给药isth出血评估工具的可靠性和可行性
标准化出血评估工具(BATs),如国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)-BAT,是用于诊断可疑出血性疾病的筛查工具。自我管理的ISTH-BAT(自我bat)将加强筛查并节省门诊就诊时间。目的探讨自我评估量表的可靠性和可行性。方法以ISTH-BAT和纸质版bat为基础,经患者和医生共同优化制作电子版bat。患有(疑似)先天性血小板缺陷(CPD)的患者,之前接受过医生管理的ISTH-BAT评估,被邀请完成自我bat。根据ISTH-BAT定义的最佳自bat截止值检测出血倾向,通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估其灵敏度≥95%。通过评估敏感性、特异性和类内相关性(ICC)来检验可靠性。对自我评价的理解程度和长度进行可行性评价。结果156例患者完成了两种版本的BAT。发现自我- bat定义出血倾向的最佳临界值与ISTH-BAT相同。88.5%(138/156, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.83-0.93)患者的ISTH-BAT和self-BAT评分符合正常/异常。自体bat检测出血倾向的敏感性和特异性分别为96.9和48.1%。ICC为0.73。96.8%(151/156)的患者认为Self-BAT问题“非常简单”、“简单”和“满意”,91%(142/156)的患者认为问卷长度“完全正确”。结论在(疑似)CPD患者中,self-BAT检测出血倾向是足够可靠和可行的,支持其作为一种筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anticoagulant Therapy in Neonatal Acute Infectious Peritonitis Based on the TAT, PIC, t-PAIC, and sTM: A New Case Series. Edoxaban Overdose in a Child: Unexpected Observation of Clot Lysis. Bleeding Risk of Central Venous Catheterization in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Identification of Prothrombin Belgrade Variant in a Mexican-American Family with Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis. Performance Verification of High Sensitivity Analyzer for TAT, PIC, TM, and t-PAIC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1