Identifying Barriers to Self-advocacy in Women With Multiple Sclerosis in Iran: A Qualitative Study

Q3 Medicine JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.32598/rj.22.3.3277.1
Sara Bachari, Ghazaleh Mandani, Roya Ghasemzadeh, S. Shahali
{"title":"Identifying Barriers to Self-advocacy in Women With Multiple Sclerosis in Iran: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Sara Bachari, Ghazaleh Mandani, Roya Ghasemzadeh, S. Shahali","doi":"10.32598/rj.22.3.3277.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Chronic Multiple Sclerosis (MS) often occurs in middle-aged people, who are supposed to take their most important roles in the family and community and thus affect their self-advocacy. This study aimed to identify the barriers to self-advocacy in women with MS. Materials & Methods: This study was conducted using a qualitative content analysis method. The participants were 10 female members of the MS Association of Khuzestan Province of Iran aged 30-40 years with different educational levels, marital status, and occupations. They were selected using a purposive sampling method. The study data were collected through semi-structured interviews and continued until data saturation from June to November 2019. The content analysis was performed using Lundman and Graneheim’s qualitative content analysis method with an inductive approach conducted continuously and simultaneously with data collection. To evaluate the validity and reliability of qualitative data, we used Lincoln and Guba criteria (credibility, dependability, conformability, and transferability). Results: The data analysis revealed 900 codes, 21 subcategories, and 6 themes of family barriers, medical barriers, job-related barriers, environmental barriers, sociocultural barriers, and psychological barriers. Conclusion: Women with MS face a variety of barriers to self-advocacy; most of them are related to family, environment, and society, in addition to personal barriers. Social support and the availability of sufficient and appropriate information about MS can play an important role in confronting these women with mentioned barriers and realizing their self-advocacy.","PeriodicalId":46374,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/rj.22.3.3277.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Chronic Multiple Sclerosis (MS) often occurs in middle-aged people, who are supposed to take their most important roles in the family and community and thus affect their self-advocacy. This study aimed to identify the barriers to self-advocacy in women with MS. Materials & Methods: This study was conducted using a qualitative content analysis method. The participants were 10 female members of the MS Association of Khuzestan Province of Iran aged 30-40 years with different educational levels, marital status, and occupations. They were selected using a purposive sampling method. The study data were collected through semi-structured interviews and continued until data saturation from June to November 2019. The content analysis was performed using Lundman and Graneheim’s qualitative content analysis method with an inductive approach conducted continuously and simultaneously with data collection. To evaluate the validity and reliability of qualitative data, we used Lincoln and Guba criteria (credibility, dependability, conformability, and transferability). Results: The data analysis revealed 900 codes, 21 subcategories, and 6 themes of family barriers, medical barriers, job-related barriers, environmental barriers, sociocultural barriers, and psychological barriers. Conclusion: Women with MS face a variety of barriers to self-advocacy; most of them are related to family, environment, and society, in addition to personal barriers. Social support and the availability of sufficient and appropriate information about MS can play an important role in confronting these women with mentioned barriers and realizing their self-advocacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定伊朗多发性硬化症妇女自我倡导的障碍:一项定性研究
目的:慢性多发性硬化症(Chronic Multiple Sclerosis, MS)常见于中年人,中年人在家庭和社区中扮演着最重要的角色,从而影响了他们的自我倡导。本研究旨在确定多发性硬化症女性自我倡导的障碍。材料与方法:本研究采用定性内容分析法进行。研究对象为伊朗胡齐斯坦省MS协会的10名女性会员,年龄在30-40岁之间,受教育程度、婚姻状况和职业不同。他们是用有目的的抽样方法选择的。研究数据通过半结构化访谈收集,并持续到2019年6月至11月的数据饱和。内容分析采用Lundman和Graneheim的定性内容分析方法,采用归纳法,与数据收集同时连续进行。为了评估定性数据的有效性和可靠性,我们使用了Lincoln和Guba标准(可信度、可靠性、一致性和可转移性)。结果:数据分析揭示了家庭障碍、医疗障碍、工作障碍、环境障碍、社会文化障碍和心理障碍6个主题,共900个代码,21个小类。结论:MS女性自我倡导面临多种障碍;除个人障碍外,大部分与家庭、环境、社会等因素有关。社会支持和获得足够和适当的MS信息可以在这些女性面对上述障碍和实现自我倡导方面发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises on Urinary Incontinence and Leisure Time activities of Women with Multiple Sclerosis The best time of weight bearing after ACL reconstruction, immediately or delayed? A randomized clinical trial Translation and Psychometric Analysis of The Farsi Version of The Watlx Outpatient Rehabilitation of Service Patients' Experience Questionnaire Effect of Pitch Discrimination-Based Rehabilitation on Diagnostic Indices of Dichotic Digit Test, monaural Selective Auditory Attention Test, and Pitch Pattern Test in Children Suspected of Auditory Processing Disorder with Pitch Discrimination Deficits The Effectiveness of Cogniplus Cognitive Training Program on Social Cognition (Theory of Mind) in 6-8-Year-Old Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1